Hermite equivalence of polynomials
In this paper, we resurrect a long-forgotten notion of equivalence for univariate polynomials with integral coefficients introduced by Hermite in the 1850s. We show that the Hermite equivalence class of a polynomial has a very natural interpretation in terms of the invariant ring and invariant ideal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2022-09 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In this paper, we resurrect a long-forgotten notion of equivalence for univariate polynomials with integral coefficients introduced by Hermite in the 1850s. We show that the Hermite equivalence class of a polynomial has a very natural interpretation in terms of the invariant ring and invariant ideal associated with the polynomial. We apply this interpretation to shed light on the relationship between Hermite equivalence and more familiar notions of polynomial equivalence, such as \({\rm GL}_2(\mathbb{Z})\)- and \(\mathbb{Z}\)-equivalence. Specifically, we prove that \({\rm GL}_2(\mathbb{Z})\)-equivalent polynomials are Hermite equivalent and, for polynomials of degree \(2\) or \(3\), the converse is also true. On the other hand, for every \(n\geq 4\), we give infinite collections of examples of polynomials \(f,g\in \mathbb{Z}[X]\) of degree \(n\) that are Hermite equivalent but not \({\rm GL}_2(\mathbb{Z})\)-equivalent. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2331-8422 |
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2109.02932 |