The Lunar Geophysical Network Landing Sites Science Rationale
The Lunar Geophysical Network (LGN) mission is proposed to land on the Moon in 2030 and deploy packages at four locations to enable geophysical measurements for 6-10 years. Returning to the lunar surface with a long-lived geophysical network is a key next step to advance lunar and planetary science....
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The Lunar Geophysical Network (LGN) mission is proposed to land on the Moon
in 2030 and deploy packages at four locations to enable geophysical
measurements for 6-10 years. Returning to the lunar surface with a long-lived
geophysical network is a key next step to advance lunar and planetary science.
LGN will greatly expand our primarily Apollo-based knowledge of the deep lunar
interior by identifying and characterizing mantle melt layers, as well as core
size and state. To meet the mission objectives, the instrument suite provides
complementary seismic, geodetic, heat flow, and electromagnetic observations.
We discuss the network landing site requirements and provide example sites that
meet these requirements. Landing site selection will continue to be optimized
throughout the formulation of this mission. Possible sites include the P-5
region within the Procellarum KREEP Terrane (PKT; (lat:$15^{\circ}$;
long:$-35^{\circ}$), Schickard Basin (lat:$-44.3^{\circ}$;
long:$-55.1^{\circ}$), Crisium Basin (lat:$18.5^{\circ}$; long:$61.8^{\circ}$),
and the farside Korolev Basin (lat:$-2.4^{\circ}$; long:$-159.3^{\circ}$).
Network optimization considers the best locations to observe seismic core
phases, e.g., ScS and PKP. Ray path density and proximity to young fault scarps
are also analyzed to provide increased opportunities for seismic observations.
Geodetic constraints require the network to have at least three nearside
stations at maximum limb distances. Heat flow and electromagnetic measurements
should be obtained away from terrane boundaries and from magnetic anomalies at
locations representative of global trends. An in-depth case study is provided
for Crisium. In addition, we discuss the consequences for scientific return of
less than optimal locations or number of stations. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2107.06451 |