Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code

We introduce Codex, a GPT language model fine-tuned on publicly available code from GitHub, and study its Python code-writing capabilities. A distinct production version of Codex powers GitHub Copilot. On HumanEval, a new evaluation set we release to measure functional correctness for synthesizing p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Mark, Tworek, Jerry, Jun, Heewoo, Yuan, Qiming, Pinto, Henrique Ponde de Oliveira, Kaplan, Jared, Edwards, Harri, Burda, Yuri, Joseph, Nicholas, Brockman, Greg, Ray, Alex, Puri, Raul, Krueger, Gretchen, Petrov, Michael, Khlaaf, Heidy, Sastry, Girish, Mishkin, Pamela, Chan, Brooke, Gray, Scott, Ryder, Nick, Pavlov, Mikhail, Power, Alethea, Kaiser, Lukasz, Bavarian, Mohammad, Winter, Clemens, Tillet, Philippe, Such, Felipe Petroski, Cummings, Dave, Plappert, Matthias, Chantzis, Fotios, Barnes, Elizabeth, Herbert-Voss, Ariel, Guss, William Hebgen, Nichol, Alex, Paino, Alex, Tezak, Nikolas, Tang, Jie, Babuschkin, Igor, Balaji, Suchir, Jain, Shantanu, Saunders, William, Hesse, Christopher, Carr, Andrew N, Leike, Jan, Achiam, Josh, Misra, Vedant, Morikawa, Evan, Radford, Alec, Knight, Matthew, Brundage, Miles, Murati, Mira, Mayer, Katie, Welinder, Peter, McGrew, Bob, Amodei, Dario, McCandlish, Sam, Sutskever, Ilya, Zaremba, Wojciech
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We introduce Codex, a GPT language model fine-tuned on publicly available code from GitHub, and study its Python code-writing capabilities. A distinct production version of Codex powers GitHub Copilot. On HumanEval, a new evaluation set we release to measure functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings, our model solves 28.8% of the problems, while GPT-3 solves 0% and GPT-J solves 11.4%. Furthermore, we find that repeated sampling from the model is a surprisingly effective strategy for producing working solutions to difficult prompts. Using this method, we solve 70.2% of our problems with 100 samples per problem. Careful investigation of our model reveals its limitations, including difficulty with docstrings describing long chains of operations and with binding operations to variables. Finally, we discuss the potential broader impacts of deploying powerful code generation technologies, covering safety, security, and economics.
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.2107.03374