High-Quality Hypergraph Partitioning
This paper considers the balanced hypergraph partitioning problem, which asks for partitioning the vertices into $k$ disjoint blocks of bounded size while minimizing an objective function over the hyperedges. Here, we consider the most commonly used connectivity metric. We describe our open source h...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This paper considers the balanced hypergraph partitioning problem, which asks
for partitioning the vertices into $k$ disjoint blocks of bounded size while
minimizing an objective function over the hyperedges. Here, we consider the
most commonly used connectivity metric. We describe our open source hypergraph
partitioner KaHyPar which is based on the successful multi-level approach --
driving it to the extreme of one level for (almost) every vertex. Using
carefully designed data structures and dynamic update techniques, this approach
offers a very good time-quality tradeoff. We present two preprocessing
techniques -- pin sparsification using locality sensitive hashing and community
detection based on the Louvain algorithm. The community structure is used to
guide the coarsening process that incrementally contracts vertices.
Portfolio-based partitioning of the contracted hypergraph already achieves good
initial solutions. While reversing the contractions, a combination of
highly-localized direct $k$-way local search and flow-based techniques that
take a more global view, refine the partition to achieve high quality.
Optionally, a memetic algorithm evolves a pool of solution candidates to obtain
even higher quality.
We evaluate KaHyPar on a large set of instances from a wide range of
application domains. With respect to quality, KaHyPar outperforms all
previously considered systems that can handle large hypergraphs such as hMETIS,
PaToH, Mondriaan, or Zoltan. KaHyPar is also faster than most of these systems
except for PaToH which represents a different speed-quality tradeoff. The
results even extend to the special case of graph partitioning, where
specialized systems such as KaHIP should have an advantage. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2106.08696 |