A simple combinatorial algorithm for restricted 2-matchings in subcubic graphs -- via half-edges

We consider three variants of the problem of finding a maximum weight restricted $2$-matching in a subcubic graph $G$. (A $2$-matching is any subset of the edges such that each vertex is incident to at most two of its edges.) Depending on the variant a restricted $2$-matching means a $2$-matching th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Paluch, Katarzyna, Wasylkiewicz, Mateusz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We consider three variants of the problem of finding a maximum weight restricted $2$-matching in a subcubic graph $G$. (A $2$-matching is any subset of the edges such that each vertex is incident to at most two of its edges.) Depending on the variant a restricted $2$-matching means a $2$-matching that is either triangle-free or square-free or both triangle- and square-free. While there exist polynomial time algorithms for the first two types of $2$-matchings, they are quite complicated or use advanced methodology. For each of the three problems we present a simple reduction to the computation of a maximum weight $b$-matching. The reduction is conducted with the aid of half-edges. A half-edge of edge $e$ is, informally speaking, a half of $e$ containing exactly one of its endpoints. For a subset of triangles of $G$, we replace each edge of such a triangle with two half-edges. Two half-edges of one edge $e$ of weight $w(e)$ may get different weights, not necessarily equal to $\frac{1}{2}w(e)$. In the metric setting when the edge weights satisfy the triangle inequality, this has a geometric interpretation connected to how an incircle partitions the edges of a triangle. Our algorithms are additionally faster than those known before. The running time of each of them is $O(n^2\log{n})$, where $n$ denotes the number of vertices in the graph.
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.2012.15775