NBR: Neutralization Based Reclamation
Safe memory reclamation (SMR) algorithms suffer from a trade-off between bounding unreclaimed memory and the speed of reclamation. Hazard pointer (HP) based algorithms bound unreclaimed memory at all times, but tend to be slower than other approaches. Epoch based reclamation (EBR) algorithms are fas...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Safe memory reclamation (SMR) algorithms suffer from a trade-off between
bounding unreclaimed memory and the speed of reclamation. Hazard pointer (HP)
based algorithms bound unreclaimed memory at all times, but tend to be slower
than other approaches. Epoch based reclamation (EBR) algorithms are faster, but
do not bound memory reclamation. Other algorithms follow hybrid approaches,
requiring special compiler or hardware support, changes to record layouts,
and/or extensive code changes. Not all SMR algorithms can be used to reclaim
memory for all data structures.
We propose a new neutralization based reclamation (NBR) algorithm that is
faster than the best known EBR algorithms and achieves bounded unreclaimed
memory. It is non-blocking when used with a non-blocking operating system (OS)
kernel, and only requires atomic read, write and CAS. NBR is straightforward to
use with many different data structures, and in most cases, require similar
reasoning and programmer effort to two-phased locking. NBR is implemented using
OS signals and a lightweight handshaking mechanism between participating
threads to determine when it is safe to reclaim a record. Experiments on a
lock-based binary search tree and a lazy linked list show that NBR
significantly outperforms many state of the art reclamation algorithms. In the
tree NBR is faster than next best algorithm, DEBRA by upto 38% and HP by upto
17%. And, in the list NBR is 15% and 243% faster than DEBRA and HP,
respectively. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2012.14542 |