Tinkering with Lattices: A New Take on the Erd\H{o}s Distance Problem
The Erd\H{o}s distance problem concerns the least number of distinct distances that can be determined by $N$ points in the plane. The integer lattice with $N$ points is known as \textit{near-optimal}, as it spans $\Theta(N/\sqrt{\log(N)})$ distinct distances, the lower bound for a set of $N$ points...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The Erd\H{o}s distance problem concerns the least number of distinct
distances that can be determined by $N$ points in the plane. The integer
lattice with $N$ points is known as \textit{near-optimal}, as it spans
$\Theta(N/\sqrt{\log(N)})$ distinct distances, the lower bound for a set of $N$
points (Erd\H{o}s, 1946). The only previous non-asymptotic work related to the
Erd\H{o}s distance problem that has been done was for $N \leq 13$. We take a
new non-asymptotic approach to this problem in a model case, studying the
distance distribution, or in other words, the plot of frequencies of each
distance of the $N\times N$ integer lattice. In order to fully characterize
this distribution, we adapt previous number-theoretic results from Fermat and
Erd\H{o}s in order to relate the frequency of a given distance on the lattice
to the sum-of-squares formula.
We study the distance distributions of all the lattice's possible subsets;
although this is a restricted case, the structure of the integer lattice allows
for the existence of subsets which can be chosen so that their distance
distributions have certain properties, such as emulating the distribution of
randomly distributed sets of points for certain small subsets, or emulating
that of the larger lattice itself. We define an error which compares the
distance distribution of a subset with that of the full lattice. The structure
of the integer lattice allows us to take subsets with certain geometric
properties in order to maximize error; we show these geometric constructions
explicitly. Further, we calculate explicit upper bounds for the error when the
number of points in the subset is $4$, $5$, $9$ or $\left \lceil
N^2/2\right\rceil$ and prove a lower bound in cases with a small number of
points. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2009.12450 |