Long-term word frequency dynamics derived from Twitter are corrupted: A bespoke approach to detecting and removing pathologies in ensembles of time series
Maintaining the integrity of long-term data collection is an essential scientific practice. As a field evolves, so too will that field's measurement instruments and data storage systems, as they are invented, improved upon, and made obsolete. For data streams generated by opaque sociotechnical...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Maintaining the integrity of long-term data collection is an essential
scientific practice. As a field evolves, so too will that field's measurement
instruments and data storage systems, as they are invented, improved upon, and
made obsolete. For data streams generated by opaque sociotechnical systems
which may have episodic and unknown internal rule changes, detecting and
accounting for shifts in historical datasets requires vigilance and creative
analysis. Here, we show that around 10\% of day-scale word usage frequency time
series for Twitter collected in real time for a set of roughly 10,000
frequently used words for over 10 years come from tweets with, in effect,
corrupted language labels. We describe how we uncovered problematic signals
while comparing word usage over varying time frames. We locate time points
where Twitter switched on or off different kinds of language identification
algorithms, and where data formats may have changed. We then show how we create
a statistic for identifying and removing words with pathological time series.
While our resulting process for removing `bad' time series from ensembles of
time series is particular, the approach leading to its construction may be
generalizeable. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2008.11305 |