Accuracy and Performance Comparison of Video Action Recognition Approaches

Over the past few years, there has been significant interest in video action recognition systems and models. However, direct comparison of accuracy and computational performance results remain clouded by differing training environments, hardware specifications, hyperparameters, pipelines, and infere...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2020-08
Hauptverfasser: Hutchinson, Matthew, Samsi, Siddharth, Arcand, William, Bestor, David, Bergeron, Bill, Byun, Chansup, Houle, Micheal, Hubbell, Matthew, Jones, Micheal, Kepner, Jeremy, Kirby, Andrew, Michaleas, Peter, Milechin, Lauren, Mullen, Julie, Prout, Andrew, Rosa, Antonio, Reuther, Albert, Yee, Charles, Gadepally, Vijay
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Over the past few years, there has been significant interest in video action recognition systems and models. However, direct comparison of accuracy and computational performance results remain clouded by differing training environments, hardware specifications, hyperparameters, pipelines, and inference methods. This article provides a direct comparison between fourteen off-the-shelf and state-of-the-art models by ensuring consistency in these training characteristics in order to provide readers with a meaningful comparison across different types of video action recognition algorithms. Accuracy of the models is evaluated using standard Top-1 and Top-5 accuracy metrics in addition to a proposed new accuracy metric. Additionally, we compare computational performance of distributed training from two to sixty-four GPUs on a state-of-the-art HPC system.
ISSN:2331-8422
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.2008.09037