Machine Learning Automatically Detects COVID-19 using Chest CTs in a Large Multicenter Cohort
Objectives: To investigate machine-learning classifiers and interpretable models using chest CT for detection of COVID-19 and differentiation from other pneumonias, ILD and normal CTs. Methods: Our retrospective multi-institutional study obtained 2096 chest CTs from 16 institutions (including 1077 C...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives: To investigate machine-learning classifiers and interpretable
models using chest CT for detection of COVID-19 and differentiation from other
pneumonias, ILD and normal CTs.
Methods: Our retrospective multi-institutional study obtained 2096 chest CTs
from 16 institutions (including 1077 COVID-19 patients). Training/testing
cohorts included 927/100 COVID-19, 388/33 ILD, 189/33 other pneumonias, and
559/34 normal (no pathologies) CTs. A metric-based approach for classification
of COVID-19 used interpretable features, relying on logistic regression and
random forests. A deep learning-based classifier differentiated COVID-19 via 3D
features extracted directly from CT attenuation and probability distribution of
airspace opacities.
Results: Most discriminative features of COVID-19 are percentage of airspace
opacity and peripheral and basal predominant opacities, concordant with the
typical characterization of COVID-19 in the literature. Unsupervised
hierarchical clustering compares feature distribution across COVID-19 and
control cohorts. The metrics-based classifier achieved AUC=0.83,
sensitivity=0.74, and specificity=0.79 of versus respectively 0.93, 0.90, and
0.83 for the DL-based classifier. Most of ambiguity comes from non-COVID-19
pneumonia with manifestations that overlap with COVID-19, as well as mild
COVID-19 cases. Non-COVID-19 classification performance is 91% for ILD, 64% for
other pneumonias and 94% for no pathologies, which demonstrates the robustness
of our method against different compositions of control groups.
Conclusions: Our new method accurately discriminates COVID-19 from other
types of pneumonia, ILD, and no pathologies CTs, using quantitative imaging
features derived from chest CT, while balancing interpretability of results and
classification performance, and therefore may be useful to facilitate diagnosis
of COVID-19. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2006.04998 |