Sweeping by Sessile Drop Coalescence

During coalescence of liquid drops contacting a solid, the liquid sweeps wetted and solid-projected areas. The extent of sweeping dictates the performance of devices such as self-cleaning surfaces, anti-frost coatings, water harvesters, and dropwise condensers. For these applications, weakly- and no...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2020-05
Hauptverfasser: Ludwicki, Jonathan M, Steen, Paul H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:During coalescence of liquid drops contacting a solid, the liquid sweeps wetted and solid-projected areas. The extent of sweeping dictates the performance of devices such as self-cleaning surfaces, anti-frost coatings, water harvesters, and dropwise condensers. For these applications, weakly- and non-wetting solid substrates are preferred as they enhance drop dynamical behavior. Accordingly, our coalescence studies here are restricted to drops with contact angle 90{\deg} \(\le \theta_{0} \le\) 180{\deg}. Binary sessile drop coalescence is the focus, with volume of fluid simulations employed as the primary tool. The simulations, which incorporate a Kistler dynamic contact angle model, are first validated against three different experimental substrate systems and then used to study the influence of solid wettability on sweeping by modifying \(\theta_{0}\). With increasing \(\theta_{0}\) up to 150{\deg}, wetted and projected swept areas both increase as drop center of mass heightens. For \(\theta_{0} \ge\) 150{\deg}, coalescence-induced drop jumping occurs owing to the decreasing wettability of the substrate and a focusing of liquid momentum due to the symmetry-breaking solid. In this regime, projected swept area continues to increase with \(\theta_0\) while wetted swept area reaches a maximum and then decreases. The sweeping results are interpreted using the mechanical energy balance from hydrodynamic theory and also compared to free drop coalescence.
ISSN:2331-8422
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.2005.06977