Too Many Claims to Fact-Check: Prioritizing Political Claims Based on Check-Worthiness
The massive amount of misinformation spreading on the Internet on a daily basis has enormous negative impacts on societies. Therefore, we need automated systems helping fact-checkers in the combat against misinformation. In this paper, we propose a model prioritizing the claims based on their check-...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The massive amount of misinformation spreading on the Internet on a daily
basis has enormous negative impacts on societies. Therefore, we need automated
systems helping fact-checkers in the combat against misinformation. In this
paper, we propose a model prioritizing the claims based on their
check-worthiness. We use BERT model with additional features including
domain-specific controversial topics, word embeddings, and others. In our
experiments, we show that our proposed model outperforms all state-of-the-art
models in both test collections of CLEF Check That! Lab in 2018 and 2019. We
also conduct a qualitative analysis to shed light-detecting check-worthy
claims. We suggest requesting rationales behind judgments are needed to
understand subjective nature of the task and problematic labels. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2004.08166 |