Redshift-space streaming velocity effects on the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest baryon acoustic oscillation scale
Phys. Rev. D 102, 023515 (2020) The baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) scale acts as a standard ruler for measuring cosmological distances and has therefore emerged as a leading probe of cosmic expansion history. However, any physical effect that alters the length of the ruler can lead to a bias in o...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Phys. Rev. D 102, 023515 (2020) The baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) scale acts as a standard ruler for
measuring cosmological distances and has therefore emerged as a leading probe
of cosmic expansion history. However, any physical effect that alters the
length of the ruler can lead to a bias in our determination of distance and
expansion rate. One of these physical effects is the streaming velocity, the
relative velocity between baryons and dark matter in the early Universe, which
couples to the BAO scale due to their common origin in acoustic waves at
recombination. In this work, we investigate the impact of streaming velocity on
the BAO feature of the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest auto-power spectrum, one of the
main tracers being used by the recently commissioned DESI spectrograph. To do
this, we develop a new perturbative model for Lyman-$\alpha$ flux density
contrast which is complete to second order for a certain set of fields, and
applicable to any redshift-space tracer of structure since it is based only on
symmetry considerations. We find that there are 8 biasing coefficients through
second order. We find streaming velocity-induced shifts in the BAO scale of
0.081--0.149% (transverse direction) and 0.053--0.058% (radial direction),
depending on the model for the biasing coefficients used. These are smaller
than, but not negligible compared to, the DESI Lyman-$\alpha$ BAO error budget,
which is 0.46% on the overall scale. The sensitivity of these results to our
choice of bias parameters underscores the need for future work to measure the
higher-order biasing coefficients from simulations, especially for future
experiments beyond DESI. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2002.12296 |