Localization of Critical Findings in Chest X-Ray without Local Annotations Using Multi-Instance Learning
The automatic detection of critical findings in chest X-rays (CXR), such as pneumothorax, is important for assisting radiologists in their clinical workflow like triaging time-sensitive cases and screening for incidental findings. While deep learning (DL) models has become a promising predictive tec...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The automatic detection of critical findings in chest X-rays (CXR), such as
pneumothorax, is important for assisting radiologists in their clinical
workflow like triaging time-sensitive cases and screening for incidental
findings. While deep learning (DL) models has become a promising predictive
technology with near-human accuracy, they commonly suffer from a lack of
explainability, which is an important aspect for clinical deployment of DL
models in the highly regulated healthcare industry. For example, localizing
critical findings in an image is useful for explaining the predictions of DL
classification algorithms. While there have been a host of joint classification
and localization methods for computer vision, the state-of-the-art DL models
require locally annotated training data in the form of pixel level labels or
bounding box coordinates. In the medical domain, this requires an expensive
amount of manual annotation by medical experts for each critical finding. This
requirement becomes a major barrier for training models that can rapidly scale
to various findings. In this work, we address these shortcomings with an
interpretable DL algorithm based on multi-instance learning that jointly
classifies and localizes critical findings in CXR without the need for local
annotations. We show competitive classification results on three different
critical findings (pneumothorax, pneumonia, and pulmonary edema) from three
different CXR datasets. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.2001.08817 |