Risk-sensitive safety specifications for stochastic systems using Conditional Value-at-Risk
This paper proposes a safety analysis method that facilitates a tunable balance between the worst-case and risk-neutral perspectives. First, we define a risk-sensitive safe set to specify the degree of safety attained by a stochastic system. This set is defined as a sublevel set of the solution to a...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This paper proposes a safety analysis method that facilitates a tunable
balance between the worst-case and risk-neutral perspectives. First, we define
a risk-sensitive safe set to specify the degree of safety attained by a
stochastic system. This set is defined as a sublevel set of the solution to an
optimal control problem that is expressed using the Conditional Value-at-Risk
(CVaR) measure. This problem does not satisfy Bellman's Principle, thus our
next contribution is to show how risk-sensitive safe sets can be
under-approximated by the solution to a CVaR-Markov Decision Process. We adopt
an existing value iteration algorithm to find an approximate solution to the
reduced problem for a class of linear systems. Then, we develop a realistic
numerical example of a stormwater system to show that this approach can be
applied to non-linear systems. Finally, we compare the CVaR criterion to the
exponential disutility criterion. The latter allocates control effort evenly
across the cost distribution to reduce variance, while the CVaR criterion
focuses control effort on a given worst-case quantile--where it matters most
for safety. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.1909.09703 |