Experimental Comparison of Visual-Aided Odometry Methods for Rail Vehicles

IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters ( Volume: 4 , Issue: 2 , April 2019 ) Today, rail vehicle localization is based on infrastructure-side Balises (beacons) together with on-board odometry to determine whether a rail segment is occupied. Such a coarse locking leads to a sub-optimal usage of the rai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Tschopp, Florian, Schneider, Thomas, Palmer, Andrew W, Nourani-Vatani, Navid, Cadena, Cesar, Siegwart, Roland, Nieto, Juan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters ( Volume: 4 , Issue: 2 , April 2019 ) Today, rail vehicle localization is based on infrastructure-side Balises (beacons) together with on-board odometry to determine whether a rail segment is occupied. Such a coarse locking leads to a sub-optimal usage of the rail networks. New railway standards propose the use of moving blocks centered around the rail vehicles to increase the capacity of the network. However, this approach requires accurate and robust position and velocity estimation of all vehicles. In this work, we investigate the applicability, challenges and limitations of current visual and visual-inertial motion estimation frameworks for rail applications. An evaluation against RTK-GPS ground truth is performed on multiple datasets recorded in industrial, sub-urban, and forest environments. Our results show that stereo visual-inertial odometry has a great potential to provide a precise motion estimation because of its complementing sensor modalities and shows superior performance in challenging situations compared to other frameworks.
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.1904.00936