On the Complexity of Solution Extension of Optimization Problems
The question if a given partial solution to a problem can be extended reasonably occurs in many algorithmic approaches for optimization problems. For instance, when enumerating minimal dominating sets of a graph $G=(V,E)$, one usually arrives at the problem to decide for a vertex set $U \subseteq V$...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The question if a given partial solution to a problem can be extended
reasonably occurs in many algorithmic approaches for optimization problems. For
instance, when enumerating minimal dominating sets of a graph $G=(V,E)$, one
usually arrives at the problem to decide for a vertex set $U \subseteq V$, if
there exists a \textit{minimal} dominating set $S$ with $U\subseteq S$. We
propose a general, partial-order based formulation of such extension problems
and study a number of specific problems which can be expressed in this
framework. Possibly contradicting intuition, these problems tend to be NP-hard,
even for problems where the underlying optimisation problem can be solved in
polynomial time. This raises the question of how fixing a partial solution
causes this increase in difficulty. In this regard, we study the parameterised
complexity of extension problems with respect to parameters related to the
partial solution, as well as the optimality of simple exact algorithms under
the Exponential-Time Hypothesis. All complexity considerations are also carried
out in very restricted scenarios, be it degree restrictions or topological
restrictions (planarity) for graph problems or the size of the given partition
for the considered extension variant of Bin Packing. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.1810.04553 |