Standard Cell Library Evaluation with Multiple lithography-compliant verification and Improved Synopsys Pin Access Checking Utility

While standard cell layouts are drawn with minimum design rules to maximize the benefit of design area shrinkage, the complicated design rules have caused difficulties with signal routes accessing the pins in standard cell layouts. As a result, it has become a great challenge for physical layout des...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Li, Yongfu, Ang, Wan Chia, Lee, Chin Hui, Chua, Kok Peng, Ong, Yoong Seang Jonathan, Hui, Chiu Wing Colin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:While standard cell layouts are drawn with minimum design rules to maximize the benefit of design area shrinkage, the complicated design rules have caused difficulties with signal routes accessing the pins in standard cell layouts. As a result, it has become a great challenge for physical layout designers to design a standard cell layout that is optimized for area, power, timing, signal integrity, and printability. Multiple design iterations are required to consider pin accessibility during standard cells layout to increase the number of feasible solutions available to the router. In this work, we will demonstrate several improvements with the Synopsys PAC methodology, such as reducing the number of cells required for each Synopsys 'testcell' with the same cell abutment condition, increasing the complexity of the pin connection for better pin accessibility evaluation. We also recommend additional constraints to improve the probability of detecting pin accessibility issues. We also integrate other physical verification methods to access the design rule compliance and the printability of standard cells. We hope that the easy to use utility enables layout engineers to perform the verification, simplifying the verification methodology.
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.1805.11426