A connection between tests for absolute convergence of infinite series, or how to be fair

The Ratio Test and the Root Test for absolute convergence/divergence of series of numbers \(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_n\) are frequently discussed and proved independently in Calculus courses. The Root Test is stronger (verifies convergence for more series) than the Ratio Test. This relation inspires int...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2024-08
1. Verfasser: Rayskin, Victoria
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Ratio Test and the Root Test for absolute convergence/divergence of series of numbers \(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_n\) are frequently discussed and proved independently in Calculus courses. The Root Test is stronger (verifies convergence for more series) than the Ratio Test. This relation inspires introduction of some intermediate strength tests (stronger than the Ratio Test and weaker than the Root Test) that we call Power Mean Tests (they, in particular, include the Arithmetic Mean Test). We show the connection between the Root, the Power Mean and the Ratio Tests. We also note that all these tests are related to the test that we formulate and call Generalized \(f\)-mean Test (or Kolmogorov-Nagumo-de Finetti mean Test). We provide an example of an infinite series, where the Arithmetic Mean test is the test that should be used for convergence verification, because the Root and the Ratio Tests are not easy to apply. We conclude this work with the statement emphasizing why it is ``fair'' to include the summarizing Corollary 3.1 in our Calculus course.
ISSN:2331-8422
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.1804.10056