TNSA proton maximum energy laws for 2D and 3D PIC simulations

Numerical simulations are a prominent tool in laser-plasma experiments. Their role, as a guide in new regime explorations and as a support for understanding laboratory results, is undisputed. But as the experiments themselves are growing in costs, setup time and complexity, so are the numerical coun...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Sinigardi, S, Babaei, J, Turchetti, G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Sinigardi, S
Babaei, J
Turchetti, G
description Numerical simulations are a prominent tool in laser-plasma experiments. Their role, as a guide in new regime explorations and as a support for understanding laboratory results, is undisputed. But as the experiments themselves are growing in costs, setup time and complexity, so are the numerical counterparts. Nowadays it is often necessary to investigate, with great accuracy, a huge set of parameters, in order to explore interesting features. In literature, it is well known that two-dimensional particle in cell (2D PIC) simulations can only give a qualitative estimation of experimental results, often through a great layer of arbitrariness. On the other hand, three-dimensional (3D) PIC simulations, for the same setup, can typically require two orders of magnitude more of computational resources, to deliver results that, while being similar to laboratory results, are still far from being a real match, due to the many uncertainties, in the parameters and in the model, included in the physical engine. Following our recent published work, we discuss here a couple of empirical laws that we proposed, that can help giving quantitative insight into 2D PIC simulations and determining when 3D simulations should be stopped, if it is not really necessary to do a detailed exploration of the numerical results at long times.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.1801.04737
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_1801_04737</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1801_04737</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-arxiv_primary_1801_047373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzsTA1NdBPLKrILNMztDAw1DMwMTc252SwDfELdlQoKMovyc9TyE2syMwtzVVIzUstSq9UyEksL1ZIyy9SMHJRSMxLUTB2UQjwdFYoBqrJSSzJzM8r5mFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDPJuriHOHrpgi-ILijJzE4sq40EWxoMtNCasAgCYEjQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>TNSA proton maximum energy laws for 2D and 3D PIC simulations</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Sinigardi, S ; Babaei, J ; Turchetti, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Sinigardi, S ; Babaei, J ; Turchetti, G</creatorcontrib><description>Numerical simulations are a prominent tool in laser-plasma experiments. Their role, as a guide in new regime explorations and as a support for understanding laboratory results, is undisputed. But as the experiments themselves are growing in costs, setup time and complexity, so are the numerical counterparts. Nowadays it is often necessary to investigate, with great accuracy, a huge set of parameters, in order to explore interesting features. In literature, it is well known that two-dimensional particle in cell (2D PIC) simulations can only give a qualitative estimation of experimental results, often through a great layer of arbitrariness. On the other hand, three-dimensional (3D) PIC simulations, for the same setup, can typically require two orders of magnitude more of computational resources, to deliver results that, while being similar to laboratory results, are still far from being a real match, due to the many uncertainties, in the parameters and in the model, included in the physical engine. Following our recent published work, we discuss here a couple of empirical laws that we proposed, that can help giving quantitative insight into 2D PIC simulations and determining when 3D simulations should be stopped, if it is not really necessary to do a detailed exploration of the numerical results at long times.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1801.04737</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Physics - Plasma Physics</subject><creationdate>2018-01</creationdate><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1801.04737$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1801.04737$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2018.01.057$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sinigardi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babaei, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turchetti, G</creatorcontrib><title>TNSA proton maximum energy laws for 2D and 3D PIC simulations</title><description>Numerical simulations are a prominent tool in laser-plasma experiments. Their role, as a guide in new regime explorations and as a support for understanding laboratory results, is undisputed. But as the experiments themselves are growing in costs, setup time and complexity, so are the numerical counterparts. Nowadays it is often necessary to investigate, with great accuracy, a huge set of parameters, in order to explore interesting features. In literature, it is well known that two-dimensional particle in cell (2D PIC) simulations can only give a qualitative estimation of experimental results, often through a great layer of arbitrariness. On the other hand, three-dimensional (3D) PIC simulations, for the same setup, can typically require two orders of magnitude more of computational resources, to deliver results that, while being similar to laboratory results, are still far from being a real match, due to the many uncertainties, in the parameters and in the model, included in the physical engine. Following our recent published work, we discuss here a couple of empirical laws that we proposed, that can help giving quantitative insight into 2D PIC simulations and determining when 3D simulations should be stopped, if it is not really necessary to do a detailed exploration of the numerical results at long times.</description><subject>Physics - Plasma Physics</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYJA0NNAzsTA1NdBPLKrILNMztDAw1DMwMTc252SwDfELdlQoKMovyc9TyE2syMwtzVVIzUstSq9UyEksL1ZIyy9SMHJRSMxLUTB2UQjwdFYoBqrJSSzJzM8r5mFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDPJuriHOHrpgi-ILijJzE4sq40EWxoMtNCasAgCYEjQg</recordid><startdate>20180115</startdate><enddate>20180115</enddate><creator>Sinigardi, S</creator><creator>Babaei, J</creator><creator>Turchetti, G</creator><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180115</creationdate><title>TNSA proton maximum energy laws for 2D and 3D PIC simulations</title><author>Sinigardi, S ; Babaei, J ; Turchetti, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-arxiv_primary_1801_047373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Physics - Plasma Physics</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sinigardi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babaei, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turchetti, G</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sinigardi, S</au><au>Babaei, J</au><au>Turchetti, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>TNSA proton maximum energy laws for 2D and 3D PIC simulations</atitle><date>2018-01-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><abstract>Numerical simulations are a prominent tool in laser-plasma experiments. Their role, as a guide in new regime explorations and as a support for understanding laboratory results, is undisputed. But as the experiments themselves are growing in costs, setup time and complexity, so are the numerical counterparts. Nowadays it is often necessary to investigate, with great accuracy, a huge set of parameters, in order to explore interesting features. In literature, it is well known that two-dimensional particle in cell (2D PIC) simulations can only give a qualitative estimation of experimental results, often through a great layer of arbitrariness. On the other hand, three-dimensional (3D) PIC simulations, for the same setup, can typically require two orders of magnitude more of computational resources, to deliver results that, while being similar to laboratory results, are still far from being a real match, due to the many uncertainties, in the parameters and in the model, included in the physical engine. Following our recent published work, we discuss here a couple of empirical laws that we proposed, that can help giving quantitative insight into 2D PIC simulations and determining when 3D simulations should be stopped, if it is not really necessary to do a detailed exploration of the numerical results at long times.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1801.04737</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1801.04737
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_1801_04737
source arXiv.org
subjects Physics - Plasma Physics
title TNSA proton maximum energy laws for 2D and 3D PIC simulations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T06%3A20%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=TNSA%20proton%20maximum%20energy%20laws%20for%202D%20and%203D%20PIC%20simulations&rft.au=Sinigardi,%20S&rft.date=2018-01-15&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1801.04737&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E1801_04737%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true