TNSA proton maximum energy laws for 2D and 3D PIC simulations
Numerical simulations are a prominent tool in laser-plasma experiments. Their role, as a guide in new regime explorations and as a support for understanding laboratory results, is undisputed. But as the experiments themselves are growing in costs, setup time and complexity, so are the numerical coun...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Numerical simulations are a prominent tool in laser-plasma experiments. Their
role, as a guide in new regime explorations and as a support for understanding
laboratory results, is undisputed. But as the experiments themselves are
growing in costs, setup time and complexity, so are the numerical counterparts.
Nowadays it is often necessary to investigate, with great accuracy, a huge set
of parameters, in order to explore interesting features.
In literature, it is well known that two-dimensional particle in cell (2D
PIC) simulations can only give a qualitative estimation of experimental
results, often through a great layer of arbitrariness. On the other hand,
three-dimensional (3D) PIC simulations, for the same setup, can typically
require two orders of magnitude more of computational resources, to deliver
results that, while being similar to laboratory results, are still far from
being a real match, due to the many uncertainties, in the parameters and in the
model, included in the physical engine.
Following our recent published work, we discuss here a couple of empirical
laws that we proposed, that can help giving quantitative insight into 2D PIC
simulations and determining when 3D simulations should be stopped, if it is not
really necessary to do a detailed exploration of the numerical results at long
times. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.1801.04737 |