Non-geodesic variations of Hodge structure of maximum dimension

There are a number of examples of variations of Hodge structure of maximum dimension. However, to our knowledge, those that are global on the level of the period domain are totally geodesic subspaces that arise from an orbit of a subgroup of the group of the period domain. That is, they are defined...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Carlson, James A, Toledo, Domingo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:There are a number of examples of variations of Hodge structure of maximum dimension. However, to our knowledge, those that are global on the level of the period domain are totally geodesic subspaces that arise from an orbit of a subgroup of the group of the period domain. That is, they are defined by Lie theory rather than by algebraic geometry. In this note, we give an example of a variation of maximum dimension which is nowhere tangent to a geodesic variation. The period domain in question, which classifies weight two Hodge structures with $h^{2,0} = 2$ and $h^{1,1} = 28$, is of dimension $57$. The horizontal tangent bundle has codimension one, thus it is an example of a holomorphic contact structure, with local integral manifolds of dimension 28. The group of the period domain is $SO(4,28)$, and one can produce global integral manifolds as orbits of the action of subgroups isomorphic to $SU(2,14)$. Our example is given by the variation of Hodge structure on the second cohomology of weighted projective hypersurfaces of degree $10$ in a weighted projective three-space with weights $1, 1, 2, 5$
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.1703.00636