On the size-Ramsey number of cycles
For given graphs $G_1,\ldots,G_k$, the size-Ramsey number $\hat{R}(G_1,\ldots,G_k)$ is the smallest integer $m$ for which there exists a graph $H$ on $m$ edges such that in every $k$-edge coloring of $H$ with colors $1,\ldots,k$, $ H $ contains a monochromatic copy of $G_i$ of color $i$ for some $1\...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | For given graphs $G_1,\ldots,G_k$, the size-Ramsey number
$\hat{R}(G_1,\ldots,G_k)$ is the smallest integer $m$ for which there exists a
graph $H$ on $m$ edges such that in every $k$-edge coloring of $H$ with colors
$1,\ldots,k$, $ H $ contains a monochromatic copy of $G_i$ of color $i$ for
some $1\leq i\leq k$. We denote $\hat{R}(G_1,\ldots,G_k)$ by $\hat{R}_{k}(G)$
when $G_1=\cdots=G_k=G$. Haxell, Kohayakawa and \L{}uczak showed that the size
Ramsey number of a cycle $C_n$ is linear in $n$ i.e. $\hat{R}_{k}(C_{n})\leq
c_k n$ for some constant $c_k$. Their proof, is based on the regularity lemma
of Szemer\'{e}di and so no specific constant $c_k$ is known. In this paper, we
give various upper bounds for the size-Ramsey numbers of cycles. We give an
alternative proof of $\hat{R}_{k}(C_{n})\leq c_k n$, avoiding the use of the
regularity lemma. For two colours, we show that for sufficiently large $n$ we
have $\hat{R}(C_{n},C_{n}) \leq 10^6\times cn,$ where $c=843$ if $n$ is even
and $c=113482$ otherwise. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.1701.07348 |