In-class vs. online administration of concept inventories and attitudinal assessments

M. Jariwala, J. S. White, B. Van Dusen, and E. W. Close, In-class vs. Online Administration of Concept Inventories and Attitudinal Assessments, 2016 PERC Proceedings [Sacramento, CA, July 20-21, 2016] This study investigates differences in student responses to in-class and online administrations of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Jariwala, Manher, White, Jada-Simone S, Van Dusen, Ben, Close, Eleanor W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:M. Jariwala, J. S. White, B. Van Dusen, and E. W. Close, In-class vs. Online Administration of Concept Inventories and Attitudinal Assessments, 2016 PERC Proceedings [Sacramento, CA, July 20-21, 2016] This study investigates differences in student responses to in-class and online administrations of the Force Concept Inventory (FCI), Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism (CSEM), and the Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS). Close to 700 physics students from 12 sections of three different courses were instructed to complete the concept inventory relevant to their course, either the FCI or CSEM, and the CLASS. Each student was randomly assigned to take one of the surveys in class and the other survey online using the LA Supported Student Outcomes (LASSO) system hosted by the Learning Assistant Alliance (LAA). We examine how testing environments and instructor practices affect participation rates and identify best practices for future use.
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.1701.01739