A Novel Framework to Expedite Systematic Reviews by Automatically Building Information Extraction Training Corpora
A systematic review identifies and collates various clinical studies and compares data elements and results in order to provide an evidence based answer for a particular clinical question. The process is manual and involves lot of time. A tool to automate this process is lacking. The aim of this wor...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A systematic review identifies and collates various clinical studies and
compares data elements and results in order to provide an evidence based answer
for a particular clinical question. The process is manual and involves lot of
time. A tool to automate this process is lacking. The aim of this work is to
develop a framework using natural language processing and machine learning to
build information extraction algorithms to identify data elements in a new
primary publication, without having to go through the expensive task of manual
annotation to build gold standards for each data element type. The system is
developed in two stages. Initially, it uses information contained in existing
systematic reviews to identify the sentences from the PDF files of the included
references that contain specific data elements of interest using a modified
Jaccard similarity measure. These sentences have been treated as labeled data.A
Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier is trained on this labeled data to
extract data elements of interests from a new article. We conducted experiments
on Cochrane Database systematic reviews related to congestive heart failure
using inclusion criteria as an example data element. The empirical results show
that the proposed system automatically identifies sentences containing the data
element of interest with a high recall (93.75%) and reasonable precision
(27.05% - which means the reviewers have to read only 3.7 sentences on
average). The empirical results suggest that the tool is retrieving valuable
information from the reference articles, even when it is time-consuming to
identify them manually. Thus we hope that the tool will be useful for automatic
data extraction from biomedical research publications. The future scope of this
work is to generalize this information framework for all types of systematic
reviews. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.1606.06424 |