Which measure for PFE? The Risk Appetite Measure, A

Potential Future Exposure (PFE) is a standard risk metric for managing business unit counterparty credit risk but there is debate on how it should be calculated. The debate has been whether to use one of many historical ("physical") measures (one per calibration setup), or one of many risk...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Kenyon, Chris, Green, Andrew, Berrahoui, Mourad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Kenyon, Chris
Green, Andrew
Berrahoui, Mourad
description Potential Future Exposure (PFE) is a standard risk metric for managing business unit counterparty credit risk but there is debate on how it should be calculated. The debate has been whether to use one of many historical ("physical") measures (one per calibration setup), or one of many risk-neutral measures (one per numeraire). However, we argue that limits should be based on the bank's own risk appetite provided that this is consistent with regulatory backtesting and that whichever measure is used it should behave (in a sense made precise) like a historical measure. Backtesting is only required by regulators for banks with IMM approval but we expect that similar methods are part of limit maintenance generally. We provide three methods for computing the bank price of risk from readily available business unit data, i.e. business unit budgets (rate of return) and limits (e.g. exposure percentiles). Hence we define and propose a Risk Appetite Measure, A, for PFE and suggest that this is uniquely consistent with the bank's Risk Appetite Framework as required by sound governance.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.1512.06247
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_1512_06247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1512_06247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a677-bf55dc8d5e809488b6527f6b70eacfe0817794318c18edae43816bd3c0da158d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzs1qAjEYheFsXBTrBXRlLqAzJpO_z5UMolVQlDLQ5ZBJvjBBxSGjpb178Wd1Ni-Hh5APznIJSrGJTX_xN-eKFznThTRvRPy00bX0hLa_JqThnOh-uZjRqkX6HfsDLbsOL_GCdPtMPmn5TgbBHnscvXZIquWimq-yze5rPS83mdXGZE1QyjvwCoFNJUCjVWGCbgxD6wIy4MZMpeDgOKC3KAVw3XjhmLdcgRdDMn7ePtR1l-LJpv_6rq8fenEDE3o9dQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Which measure for PFE? The Risk Appetite Measure, A</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Kenyon, Chris ; Green, Andrew ; Berrahoui, Mourad</creator><creatorcontrib>Kenyon, Chris ; Green, Andrew ; Berrahoui, Mourad</creatorcontrib><description>Potential Future Exposure (PFE) is a standard risk metric for managing business unit counterparty credit risk but there is debate on how it should be calculated. The debate has been whether to use one of many historical ("physical") measures (one per calibration setup), or one of many risk-neutral measures (one per numeraire). However, we argue that limits should be based on the bank's own risk appetite provided that this is consistent with regulatory backtesting and that whichever measure is used it should behave (in a sense made precise) like a historical measure. Backtesting is only required by regulators for banks with IMM approval but we expect that similar methods are part of limit maintenance generally. We provide three methods for computing the bank price of risk from readily available business unit data, i.e. business unit budgets (rate of return) and limits (e.g. exposure percentiles). Hence we define and propose a Risk Appetite Measure, A, for PFE and suggest that this is uniquely consistent with the bank's Risk Appetite Framework as required by sound governance.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1512.06247</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Quantitative Finance - Mathematical Finance ; Quantitative Finance - Portfolio Management ; Quantitative Finance - Pricing of Securities ; Quantitative Finance - Risk Management</subject><creationdate>2015-12</creationdate><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,881</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1512.06247$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1512.06247$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kenyon, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berrahoui, Mourad</creatorcontrib><title>Which measure for PFE? The Risk Appetite Measure, A</title><description>Potential Future Exposure (PFE) is a standard risk metric for managing business unit counterparty credit risk but there is debate on how it should be calculated. The debate has been whether to use one of many historical ("physical") measures (one per calibration setup), or one of many risk-neutral measures (one per numeraire). However, we argue that limits should be based on the bank's own risk appetite provided that this is consistent with regulatory backtesting and that whichever measure is used it should behave (in a sense made precise) like a historical measure. Backtesting is only required by regulators for banks with IMM approval but we expect that similar methods are part of limit maintenance generally. We provide three methods for computing the bank price of risk from readily available business unit data, i.e. business unit budgets (rate of return) and limits (e.g. exposure percentiles). Hence we define and propose a Risk Appetite Measure, A, for PFE and suggest that this is uniquely consistent with the bank's Risk Appetite Framework as required by sound governance.</description><subject>Quantitative Finance - Mathematical Finance</subject><subject>Quantitative Finance - Portfolio Management</subject><subject>Quantitative Finance - Pricing of Securities</subject><subject>Quantitative Finance - Risk Management</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotzs1qAjEYheFsXBTrBXRlLqAzJpO_z5UMolVQlDLQ5ZBJvjBBxSGjpb178Wd1Ni-Hh5APznIJSrGJTX_xN-eKFznThTRvRPy00bX0hLa_JqThnOh-uZjRqkX6HfsDLbsOL_GCdPtMPmn5TgbBHnscvXZIquWimq-yze5rPS83mdXGZE1QyjvwCoFNJUCjVWGCbgxD6wIy4MZMpeDgOKC3KAVw3XjhmLdcgRdDMn7ePtR1l-LJpv_6rq8fenEDE3o9dQ</recordid><startdate>20151219</startdate><enddate>20151219</enddate><creator>Kenyon, Chris</creator><creator>Green, Andrew</creator><creator>Berrahoui, Mourad</creator><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151219</creationdate><title>Which measure for PFE? The Risk Appetite Measure, A</title><author>Kenyon, Chris ; Green, Andrew ; Berrahoui, Mourad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a677-bf55dc8d5e809488b6527f6b70eacfe0817794318c18edae43816bd3c0da158d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Quantitative Finance - Mathematical Finance</topic><topic>Quantitative Finance - Portfolio Management</topic><topic>Quantitative Finance - Pricing of Securities</topic><topic>Quantitative Finance - Risk Management</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kenyon, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berrahoui, Mourad</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kenyon, Chris</au><au>Green, Andrew</au><au>Berrahoui, Mourad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Which measure for PFE? The Risk Appetite Measure, A</atitle><date>2015-12-19</date><risdate>2015</risdate><abstract>Potential Future Exposure (PFE) is a standard risk metric for managing business unit counterparty credit risk but there is debate on how it should be calculated. The debate has been whether to use one of many historical ("physical") measures (one per calibration setup), or one of many risk-neutral measures (one per numeraire). However, we argue that limits should be based on the bank's own risk appetite provided that this is consistent with regulatory backtesting and that whichever measure is used it should behave (in a sense made precise) like a historical measure. Backtesting is only required by regulators for banks with IMM approval but we expect that similar methods are part of limit maintenance generally. We provide three methods for computing the bank price of risk from readily available business unit data, i.e. business unit budgets (rate of return) and limits (e.g. exposure percentiles). Hence we define and propose a Risk Appetite Measure, A, for PFE and suggest that this is uniquely consistent with the bank's Risk Appetite Framework as required by sound governance.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1512.06247</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1512.06247
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_1512_06247
source arXiv.org
subjects Quantitative Finance - Mathematical Finance
Quantitative Finance - Portfolio Management
Quantitative Finance - Pricing of Securities
Quantitative Finance - Risk Management
title Which measure for PFE? The Risk Appetite Measure, A
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T06%3A57%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Which%20measure%20for%20PFE?%20The%20Risk%20Appetite%20Measure,%20A&rft.au=Kenyon,%20Chris&rft.date=2015-12-19&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1512.06247&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E1512_06247%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true