Which measure for PFE? The Risk Appetite Measure, A
Potential Future Exposure (PFE) is a standard risk metric for managing business unit counterparty credit risk but there is debate on how it should be calculated. The debate has been whether to use one of many historical ("physical") measures (one per calibration setup), or one of many risk...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Potential Future Exposure (PFE) is a standard risk metric for managing
business unit counterparty credit risk but there is debate on how it should be
calculated. The debate has been whether to use one of many historical
("physical") measures (one per calibration setup), or one of many risk-neutral
measures (one per numeraire). However, we argue that limits should be based on
the bank's own risk appetite provided that this is consistent with regulatory
backtesting and that whichever measure is used it should behave (in a sense
made precise) like a historical measure. Backtesting is only required by
regulators for banks with IMM approval but we expect that similar methods are
part of limit maintenance generally. We provide three methods for computing the
bank price of risk from readily available business unit data, i.e. business
unit budgets (rate of return) and limits (e.g. exposure percentiles). Hence we
define and propose a Risk Appetite Measure, A, for PFE and suggest that this is
uniquely consistent with the bank's Risk Appetite Framework as required by
sound governance. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.1512.06247 |