Scaling limits for the threshold window: When does a monotone Boolean function flip its outcome?
Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincar\'e Probabilit\'es et Statistiques, 53(4): 2135-2161, 2017 Consider a monotone Boolean function $f:\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}$ and the canonical monotone coupling $\{\eta_p:p\in[0,1]\}$ of an element in $\{0,1\}^n$ chosen according to product measure with i...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincar\'e Probabilit\'es et
Statistiques, 53(4): 2135-2161, 2017 Consider a monotone Boolean function $f:\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}$ and the
canonical monotone coupling $\{\eta_p:p\in[0,1]\}$ of an element in $\{0,1\}^n$
chosen according to product measure with intensity $p\in[0,1]$. The random
point $p\in[0,1]$ where $f(\eta_p)$ flips from $0$ to $1$ is often concentrated
near a particular point, thus exhibiting a threshold phenomenon. For a sequence
of such Boolean functions, we peer closely into this threshold window and
consider, for large $n$, the limiting distribution (properly normalized to be
nondegenerate) of this random point where the Boolean function switches from
being 0 to 1. We determine this distribution for a number of the Boolean
functions which are typically studied and pay particular attention to the
functions corresponding to iterated majority and percolation crossings. It
turns out that these limiting distributions have quite varying behavior. In
fact, we show that any nondegenerate probability measure on $\mathbb{R}$ arises
in this way for some sequence of Boolean functions. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.1405.7144 |