Lyndon words and Fibonacci numbers
It is a fundamental property of non-letter Lyndon words that they can be expressed as a concatenation of two shorter Lyndon words. This leads to a naive lower bound log_{2}(n)} + 1 for the number of distinct Lyndon factors that a Lyndon word of length n must have, but this bound is not optimal. In t...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | It is a fundamental property of non-letter Lyndon words that they can be
expressed as a concatenation of two shorter Lyndon words. This leads to a naive
lower bound log_{2}(n)} + 1 for the number of distinct Lyndon factors that a
Lyndon word of length n must have, but this bound is not optimal. In this paper
we show that a much more accurate lower bound is log_{phi}(n) + 1, where phi
denotes the golden ratio (1 + sqrt{5})/2. We show that this bound is optimal in
that it is attained by the Fibonacci Lyndon words. We then introduce a mapping
L_x that counts the number of Lyndon factors of length at most n in an infinite
word x. We show that a recurrent infinite word x is aperiodic if and only if
L_x >= L_f, where f is the Fibonacci infinite word, with equality if and only
if f is in the shift orbit closure of f. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.48550/arxiv.1207.4233 |