Using the Two-Branch Tournament Genetic Algorithm for Multiobjective Design

The two-branch tournament genetic algorithm is presented as an approach to determine a set of Pareto-optimal solutions to multiobjective design problems. Because the genetic algorithm (GA) searches using a population of points rather than using a point-to-point search, it is possible to generate a l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AIAA journal 1999-02, Vol.37 (2), p.261-267
Hauptverfasser: Crossley, William A, Cook, Andrea M, Fanjoy, David W, Venkayya, Vipperla B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The two-branch tournament genetic algorithm is presented as an approach to determine a set of Pareto-optimal solutions to multiobjective design problems. Because the genetic algorithm (GA) searches using a population of points rather than using a point-to-point search, it is possible to generate a large number of solutions to multiobjective problems in a single run of the algorithm. The two-branch tournament and its implementation in a GA to provide these solutions are discussed. This approach differs from most traditional methods for GA-based multiobjective design; it does not require the nondominated ranking approach nor does it require additional fitness manipulations. A multiobjective mathematical benchmark problem and a 10-bar truss problem were solved to illustrate how this approach works for typical multiobjective problems. These problems also allowed comparison to published solutions. The two-branch GA was also applied to a problem combining discrete and continuous variables to illustrate an additional advantage of this approach for multiobjective design problems. Results of all three problems were compared to those of single-objective approaches, providing a measure of how closely the Pareto-optimal set is estimated by the two-branch GA. Finally, conclusions were made about the benefits and potential for improvement of this approach. (Author)
ISSN:0001-1452
1533-385X
DOI:10.2514/2.699