Transverse Injection from Circular and Elliptic Nozzles into a Supersonic Crossflow

An investigation of sonic transverse injection from circular and elliptic nozzles into a supersonic crossflow using planar Rayleigh /Mie scattering is reported. Instantaneous images allow examination of the structural details, whereas ensemble-averaged images provide transverse penetration and later...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of propulsion and power 2000-05, Vol.16 (3), p.449-457
Hauptverfasser: Gruber, M. R, Nejad, A. S, Chen, T. H, Dutton, J. C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:An investigation of sonic transverse injection from circular and elliptic nozzles into a supersonic crossflow using planar Rayleigh /Mie scattering is reported. Instantaneous images allow examination of the structural details, whereas ensemble-averaged images provide transverse penetration and lateral spread data for each jet. Standard deviation images produce information regarding the large-scale mixing/entrainment and reveal the mixing zones. Results show a highly 3D near-field interaction dominated by shear-layer eddies and a counter-rotating vortex pair. Ensemble-averaged results show that the elliptic jet spreads more rapidly in the lateral direction than the circular jet, confirming that an axis-switching phenomenon is present. Near-field transverse penetration data collapse well with low-speed scaling conventions; however, the jet produced by the elliptic nozzle suffers a 20 percent reduction in penetration compared to the circular jet. Compressibility level does not play a significant role in the average penetration or spread of these jets, although it strongly affects the mixing/entrainment and large-scale structure. Analysis of mixing potential from the standard deviation images indicates that the low and high convective Mach number M(e) injection cases are significantly different; low M(e) injection yields better large-scale mixing potential than high M(e) injection, regardless of the injector geometry. (Author)
ISSN:0748-4658
1533-3876
DOI:10.2514/2.5609