Comparison of two methods for solving three-dimensional unsteady compressible viscous flows

Comparison of two methods for solving three-dimensional unsteady compressible viscous flows

In a study, it was found that the generalized minimal residual (GMRES) scheme can reduce CPU time by as much as 60% compared to the noniterative alternating direction implicit scheme.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AIAA journal 1994-10, Vol.32 (10), p.1978-1984
Hauptverfasser: Hixon, Ray, Tsung, Fu-Lin, Sankar, L. N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Aerodynamics
Compressible flow
Compressible flows
shock and detonation phenomena
Computational methods in fluid dynamics
Computer based modeling
Equations of motion
Exact sciences and technology
Fluid dynamics
Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)
Integration
Iterative methods
Mathematical operators
Mathematics
Physics
Simulation
Three dimensional
Transonic flows
Unsteady flow
Vectors
Viscous flow
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In a study, it was found that the generalized minimal residual (GMRES) scheme can reduce CPU time by as much as 60% compared to the noniterative alternating direction implicit scheme.
ISSN:0001-1452
1533-385X
DOI:10.2514/3.12241