Entry System Options for Human Return from the Moon and Mars
Earth-entry system options for human return missions from the moon and Mars were analyzed and compared to identify trends among the configurations and trajectory options and to facilitate informed decision-making at the exploration architecture level. Entry system options included ballistic, lifting...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of spacecraft and rockets 2007-01, Vol.44 (1), p.194-202 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Earth-entry system options for human return missions from the moon and Mars were analyzed and compared to identify trends among the configurations and trajectory options and to facilitate informed decision-making at the exploration architecture level. Entry system options included ballistic, lifting capsule, biconic, and lifting body configurations with direct-entry and aerocapture trajectories. For each configuration and trajectory option, the thermal environment, deceleration environment, crossrange and downrange performance, and entry corridor were assessed. In addition, the feasibility of a common vehicle for lunar and Mars return was investigated. The results show that a low lift-to-drag ratio (LID = 0.3) vehicle provides sufficient performance for both lunar and Mars return missions while providing the following benefits: excellent packaging efficiency, low structural and thermal protection system mass fraction, ease of launch vehicle integration, and system elegance and simplicity. Numerous configuration options exist that achieve this lift-to-drag ratio. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4650 1533-6794 |
DOI: | 10.2514/1.20351 |