Mechanism of Li-Ion Migration in the Superionic Conducting Open-Framework Structure Li6B18(Li3N)1–x (Li2O) x (0 ≤ x ≤ 1)

Solid lithium-ion conductors are important components for all-solid-state batteries and the knowledge of the mechanism of Li diffusion is an important step in improving known materials and developing new materials. For the Li-ion conductor α-Li3N, the lithium diffusion process has been intensively i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of physical chemistry. C 2023-01, Vol.127 (3), p.1622-1632
Hauptverfasser: Spranger, Robert J., Kirchhain, Holger, Restle, Tassilo M. F., Dums, Jasmin V., Karttunen, Antti J., van Wüllen, Leo, Fässler, Thomas F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Solid lithium-ion conductors are important components for all-solid-state batteries and the knowledge of the mechanism of Li diffusion is an important step in improving known materials and developing new materials. For the Li-ion conductor α-Li3N, the lithium diffusion process has been intensively investigated. We report here on the Li-ion diffusion in the open-framework structure Li6B18(Li3N)1–x (Li2O) in which Li3N and/or Li2O serve as a guest. Whereas vacancy formation for α-Li3N is not possible by forming a solid solution with Li2O, the solid solution of Li6B18(Li3N)1–x (Li2O) x exists over the whole composition range with an increasing number of Li vacancies with x and samples for x = 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 are investigated. A variety of solid-state NMR approaches, including 7Li T 1 relaxation NMR, temperature-dependent 6Li-magic angle spinning (MAS)-NMR, and 6Li-{7Li}-cross-polarization (CP)-MAS 2D-exchange NMR, and a detailed 7Li line shape analysis are combined with quantum chemical calculations of Li migration pathways to unravel the mechanism of Li diffusion in the open-framework structures Li6B18(Li3N)1–x (Li2O) x , hosting three different Li sites. The combined results indicate an anisotropic Li diffusion process, in which the motion along the crystallographic c-direction seems to be strongly hindered (Li2 ↔ Li3). On the other hand, the diffusion pathway in the ab-plane is characterized by a two-step motional process that combines Li1 ↔ Li2 and Li2 ↔ Li2 jumps with very low activation energies in the range of 30–40 kJ/mol for Li1 ↔ Li2 and 515 kJ/mol for Li2 ↔ Li2. Thus, lithium migration within the title compound bears strong similarities to the Li diffusion processes present in the well-known Li-ion conductor α-Li3N.
ISSN:1932-7447
1932-7455
DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c06839