Constitutional Justice under Populism The Transformation of Constitutional Jurisprudence in Hungary Since 2010

Constitutional Justice under Populism The Transformation of Constitutional Jurisprudence in Hungary Since 2010

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Gárdos-Orosz, Fruzsina (VerfasserIn)
Format: Elektronisch E-Book
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Alphen aan den Rijn Wolters Kluwer Law International 2024
Ausgabe:1st ed
Online-Zugang:DE-2070s
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Inhaltsangabe:
  • Front cover
  • Constitutional Justice under Populism
  • Title
  • Copyright
  • Table of content
  • INTRODUCTION
  • 1. CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW,CONSTITUTIONAL COURTSAND THE INSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGESOF THE 21ST CENTURY IN EUROPE
  • 2. THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURTOF THE FUNDAMENTAL LAW.THE BEGINNINGS
  • 2.1. Concerning the transformation
  • 2.2. The experience of competences
  • 2.2.1. The constitutional complaint
  • 2.2.1.1. Against a judicial decision.Review of the constitutionality of the law applied
  • 2.2.1.2. Review of legislation wherethe application directly infringes fundamental rights
  • 2.2.1.3. Against a judicial decision: Review of the constitutionalityof a judicial decision
  • 2.2.2. Judicial referral - concrete norm control
  • 2.2.3. Ex-post abstract norm control
  • 2.2.4. Preliminary abstract norm control
  • 2.3. The approach to the pre-Fundamental Lawcase law
  • 2.4. The role of international law and EU law
  • 3. AFTER THE BEGINNING -NEW CHALLENGES - NEW RESPONSES
  • 3.1. The principles of interpretation
  • 3.1.1. A new set of interpretative methods or a reformulationof classic interpretative methods?
  • 3.1.2. Application of mandatory interpretation methodsin the practice of the Constitutional Court
  • 3.1.2.1. Application of the new mandatory interpretation methods
  • 3.1.2.2. Politically sensitive cases
  • 3.1.3. Conclusions
  • 3.2. Constitutional protection of the identityof the Fundamental Law
  • 3.2.1. Populist constitutionalism
  • 3.2.2. The role of the "constitutional tradition" in the identityof the Fundamental Law
  • 3.2.3. The revival of the historical constitution?
  • 3.2.4. The protection of constitutional identity bythe Constitutional Court
  • 3.2.5. Conclusions
  • 3.3. Some classic dilemmas of constitutionaladjudication in a new light
  • 3.3.1. A "countermajoritarian difficulty"
  • 3.3.2. Activism and/or deference
  • 3.3.3. Constitutional review of the amendmentof the Fundamental Law
  • 4. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THECONSTITUTIONAL COURTAND THE ORDINARY COURTS IN THEPROTECTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
  • 4.1. Constitutional presumptions
  • 4.2. The signifi cance of the constitutional complaint
  • 4.2.1. Subject of the inquiry
  • 4.2.2. Constitutional complaint pursuant to Article 27 of the Acton the Constitutional Court
  • 4.2.3. Figures on inclusiveness and success rates
  • 4.2.4. The traditional approach - the importanceof the admissibility procedure in the relationship betweenthe ordinary court and the Constitutional Court
  • 4.2.4.1. Admissibility: what is "prejudice to a right guaranteed bythe Fundamental Law?"
  • 4.2.4.2. Admissibility: what is the fundamental constitutional issue?
  • 4.2.5. Conclusions
  • 4.3. The enforcement of fundamental rightsin the practice of ordinary courts and the roleof the Constitutional Court
  • 4.3.1. Introduction
  • 4.3.2. The starting point - the purpose of the legal construct
  • 4.3.3. Th e doctrine of horizontal eff ect and the new constitutionalbases - lessons from the judicial practice
  • 4.3.3.1. Right to property
  • 4.3.3.2. Freedom of the press and freedom of expression
  • 4.3.3.3. "Police offi cer's portrait"
  • 4.3.3.4. Violation of the right to privacy
  • 4.3.4. Sub-summary: the horizontal eff ect and its practice underthe Fundamental Law
  • 4.3.5. Conclusions
  • 5. FROM CRISIS TO CRISIS.HUNGARIAN CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEWIN THE EUROPEAN SPACE
  • 5.1. Changes in the practice of the ConstitutionalCourt in the context of the economic crisis,the migration crisis, the fi ght against terrorism,national security and the pandemic
  • 5.1.1. The standards of fundamental rights protectionin normalcy and in emergency in Hungary
  • 5.1.1.1. The history of fundamental rights protectionin Hungary
  • 5.1.1.2. What is a fundamental right in normalcy and in emergencyin Hungary?
  • 5.1.1.3. Content of the state obligation to protect rights
  • 5.1.1.4. The test of fundamental rights restrictions
  • 5.1.1.5. Standards of human rights protection in the special legal order
  • 5.1.1.6. Conclusions
  • 5.1.2. The impact of the economic crisis on constitutional jurisprudence
  • 5.1.2.1. Background
  • 5.1.2.2. Changes in the practice of the Constitutional Court
  • 5.1.2.3. Foreign currency credit loan cases
  • 5.1.3. Migration
  • 5.1.4. Terrorism threat and security challenges
  • 5.1.5. Covid-19 and Constitutional Court in Hungary
  • 5.1.5.1. The special legal order
  • 5.1.5.2. The complicated practice of the Constitutional Court
  • 5.2. The Hungarian Constitutional Courtin the European Constitutional Space
  • 5.2.1. Introduction
  • 5.2.2. European constitutional courts' responses to social,economic and political challenges
  • 5.2.2.1. The change
  • 5.2.2.2. Continuity and change
  • 5.2.2.3. Stability and continuity
  • 5.2.3. The exceptions
  • 5.2.3.1. Specifi c routes
  • 5.2.3.2. The Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Courtof Human Rights
  • 5.2.4. Main constitutional strategies to address socialand economic challenges
  • 5.2.4.1. General solutions
  • 5.2.4.2. New interpretative methods and substantive conceptsin constitutional law
  • 5.3. Possible reasons for changes in case law
  • 5.3.1. European trends
  • 5.3.2. Explanation of Hungarian Constitutional Court practice -in a crisis situation
  • 6. QUO VADIS, HUNGARIANCONSTITUTIONAL COURT?
  • 6.1. On the benchmarks for evaluatingconstitutional review
  • 6.2. Not everything is what it appears to be
  • BIBLIOGRAPHY
  • Back cover

Ähnliche Einträge