On resisting art
What responsibilities do audiences have in engaging with artworks? Certain audience responses seem quite clear: for example, audiences should not vandalize or destroy artworks; they should not disrupt performances. This paper examines other kinds of resisting responses that audiences sometimes engag...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2022
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV049318323 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20230920 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 230908s2022 xx |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1401193186 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049318323 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-255 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Harold, James |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a On resisting art |c James Harold |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a What responsibilities do audiences have in engaging with artworks? Certain audience responses seem quite clear: for example, audiences should not vandalize or destroy artworks; they should not disrupt performances. This paper examines other kinds of resisting responses that audiences sometimes engage in, including petitioning the artist to change their works, altering copies of artworks, and creating new artworks in another artist’s fictional world. I argue for five claims: (1) while these actions can sometimes infringe on the rights of artists, the rights of artists are not absolute; (2) the fact that such actions are based on mistaken interpretations of the artworks has no normative weight; (3) there can be reason to object to additions and alterations whose conception of the artwork is morally worse than the original (and so, there can be reason to support additions and alterations whose conception is morally better); (4) petitioning raises special moral problems; and, most important, (5) some of these actions are valuable because they involve creative and aesthetic activity. Those acts of audience resistance that are creative, morally improve on the original work, and that minimize the infringement of the artists’ rights are good, and should be encouraged. | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Ästhetik |0 (DE-588)4000626-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rezipient |0 (DE-588)4177969-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kunstwerk |0 (DE-588)4123592-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Kunstwerk |0 (DE-588)4123592-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Rezipient |0 (DE-588)4177969-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Ästhetik |0 (DE-588)4000626-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:81 |g number:1 |g year:2023 |g pages:35-45 |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |t The journal of aesthetics and art criticism / American Society for Aesthetics. Ed. Thomas Munro |d Hoboken, NJ, 2022 |g Volume 81, number 1 (March 2023), Seite 35-45 |w (DE-604)BV002662422 |x 0021-8529 |o (DE-600)2930-0 |
| 941 | |b 81 |h 1 |j 2023 |s 35-45 | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034579302 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1819315220579876864 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| article_link | (DE-604)BV002662422 |
| author | Harold, James |
| author_facet | Harold, James |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Harold, James |
| author_variant | j h jh |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV049318323 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1401193186 (DE-599)BVBBV049318323 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02546naa a2200361 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049318323</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230920 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230908s2022 xx |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1401193186</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049318323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-255</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Harold, James</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">On resisting art</subfield><subfield code="c">James Harold</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">What responsibilities do audiences have in engaging with artworks? Certain audience responses seem quite clear: for example, audiences should not vandalize or destroy artworks; they should not disrupt performances. This paper examines other kinds of resisting responses that audiences sometimes engage in, including petitioning the artist to change their works, altering copies of artworks, and creating new artworks in another artist’s fictional world. I argue for five claims: (1) while these actions can sometimes infringe on the rights of artists, the rights of artists are not absolute; (2) the fact that such actions are based on mistaken interpretations of the artworks has no normative weight; (3) there can be reason to object to additions and alterations whose conception of the artwork is morally worse than the original (and so, there can be reason to support additions and alterations whose conception is morally better); (4) petitioning raises special moral problems; and, most important, (5) some of these actions are valuable because they involve creative and aesthetic activity. Those acts of audience resistance that are creative, morally improve on the original work, and that minimize the infringement of the artists’ rights are good, and should be encouraged.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ästhetik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4000626-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rezipient</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4177969-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kunstwerk</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4123592-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kunstwerk</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4123592-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Rezipient</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4177969-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Ästhetik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4000626-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:81</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:35-45</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="t">The journal of aesthetics and art criticism / American Society for Aesthetics. Ed. Thomas Munro</subfield><subfield code="d">Hoboken, NJ, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">Volume 81, number 1 (March 2023), Seite 35-45</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV002662422</subfield><subfield code="x">0021-8529</subfield><subfield code="o">(DE-600)2930-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="941" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">81</subfield><subfield code="h">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="s">35-45</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034579302</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV049318323 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-24T09:56:37Z |
| institution | BVB |
| issn | 0021-8529 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034579302 |
| oclc_num | 1401193186 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-255 |
| owner_facet | DE-255 |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateSearch | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Harold, James Verfasser aut On resisting art James Harold 2022 txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier What responsibilities do audiences have in engaging with artworks? Certain audience responses seem quite clear: for example, audiences should not vandalize or destroy artworks; they should not disrupt performances. This paper examines other kinds of resisting responses that audiences sometimes engage in, including petitioning the artist to change their works, altering copies of artworks, and creating new artworks in another artist’s fictional world. I argue for five claims: (1) while these actions can sometimes infringe on the rights of artists, the rights of artists are not absolute; (2) the fact that such actions are based on mistaken interpretations of the artworks has no normative weight; (3) there can be reason to object to additions and alterations whose conception of the artwork is morally worse than the original (and so, there can be reason to support additions and alterations whose conception is morally better); (4) petitioning raises special moral problems; and, most important, (5) some of these actions are valuable because they involve creative and aesthetic activity. Those acts of audience resistance that are creative, morally improve on the original work, and that minimize the infringement of the artists’ rights are good, and should be encouraged. Ästhetik (DE-588)4000626-8 gnd rswk-swf Rezipient (DE-588)4177969-1 gnd rswk-swf Kunstwerk (DE-588)4123592-7 gnd rswk-swf Kunstwerk (DE-588)4123592-7 s Rezipient (DE-588)4177969-1 s Ästhetik (DE-588)4000626-8 s DE-604 volume:81 number:1 year:2023 pages:35-45 The journal of aesthetics and art criticism / American Society for Aesthetics. Ed. Thomas Munro Hoboken, NJ, 2022 Volume 81, number 1 (March 2023), Seite 35-45 (DE-604)BV002662422 0021-8529 (DE-600)2930-0 |
| spellingShingle | Harold, James On resisting art Ästhetik (DE-588)4000626-8 gnd Rezipient (DE-588)4177969-1 gnd Kunstwerk (DE-588)4123592-7 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4000626-8 (DE-588)4177969-1 (DE-588)4123592-7 |
| title | On resisting art |
| title_auth | On resisting art |
| title_exact_search | On resisting art |
| title_full | On resisting art James Harold |
| title_fullStr | On resisting art James Harold |
| title_full_unstemmed | On resisting art James Harold |
| title_short | On resisting art |
| title_sort | on resisting art |
| topic | Ästhetik (DE-588)4000626-8 gnd Rezipient (DE-588)4177969-1 gnd Kunstwerk (DE-588)4123592-7 gnd |
| topic_facet | Ästhetik Rezipient Kunstwerk |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT haroldjames onresistingart |