Blind Spots in the Spotlight National Bank of Romania's Answers to the Financial Crisis Aftershocks from the Perspective of Central Bankers, the Public and the Media
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cham
Springer International Publishing AG
2022
|
| Ausgabe: | 1st ed |
| Schriftenreihe: | Financial and Monetary Policy Studies
v.53 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | HWR01 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zcb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV049293398 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230822s2022 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9783031040672 |9 978-3-031-04067-2 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-30-PQE)EBC7018949 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-30-PAD)EBC7018949 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL7018949 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1333081864 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV049293398 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-2070s | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 332.1109498 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Iacob, Raluca |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Blind Spots in the Spotlight |b National Bank of Romania's Answers to the Financial Crisis Aftershocks from the Perspective of Central Bankers, the Public and the Media |
| 250 | |a 1st ed | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Cham |b Springer International Publishing AG |c 2022 | |
| 264 | 4 | |c ©2022 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (237 Seiten) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Financial and Monetary Policy Studies |v v.53 | |
| 500 | |a Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a Intro -- Acknowledgments -- Disclaimer -- Contents -- About the Author -- List of Acronyms -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- Chapter 1: Introduction -- References -- Chapter 2: Public Communication of Central Banks: Theoretical Perspectives -- 2.1 Communication: A Monetary Policy Tool -- 2.2 Confidence in Central Banks -- 2.3 Strategic Communication of Central Banks -- 2.3.1 Language -- 2.3.2 Publics -- 2.3.3 Communication Channels -- 2.3.4 Tactics -- 2.4 Changes Triggered by the Great Recession -- References -- Chapter 3: Framing Theory -- 3.1 Framing Paradigm -- 3.2 News Framing and Public Opinion -- 3.3 Framing and Journalistic Practice: News Values-Gatekeeping -- 3.4 Framing and Public Relations -- 3.5 Competing Frames and Rhetoric of Elites -- 3.6 Framing the Financial Crisis -- 3.6.1 In the International Media -- 3.6.2 In the Romanian Press -- References -- Chapter 4: Research Design and Elements -- 4.1 Propagation of the 2008 Crisis in Romania -- 4.2 Communication Situations -- 4.3 Defining the Main Actors -- 4.4 Research Design -- 4.5 Research Elements -- 4.5.1 Research Questions -- 4.5.2 Research Methods -- 4.5.2.1 Interviews -- 4.5.2.2 Questionnaire-Based Sociological Surveys -- 4.5.2.3 Content Analysis -- References -- Chapter 5: NBR Representatives About the Change of Public Communication After 2008 -- 5.1 Setting the Scene: Pre-crisis Communication with Stakeholders -- 5.2 The Main Post-crisis Changes -- 5.2.1 Frequency of NBR Communication -- 5.2.2 Polyphony or Cacophony? -- 5.2.3 Diversification of Communication Topics -- 5.3 Jargon: A Double-Edged Sword -- 5.3.1 (Almost) Everything for Audiences -- 5.3.2 Challenges for Communicators -- 5.3.3 Limits of Simplification -- 5.4 Main Debate (2014-2016) -- 5.4.1 Greek Capital Banks -- 5.4.2 The Swiss Franc Loans Crisis -- 5.4.3 Giving in Payment Law | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 5.4.3.1 Stakeholder Play and Message Transmission -- 5.4.3.2 NBR: Advocate of Commercial Banks? -- 5.5 Trust in the NBR Post-crisis -- 5.5.1 NBR Reputation Locally and Internationally -- 5.5.2 Target Audience and Financial Education -- 5.5.3 Strategic Communication -- 5.6 The Most Effective Communication Channels -- 5.7 Should the NBR Go on Facebook? -- 5.8 Monetary Communication After 2008 -- 5.8.1 Evaluating Communication as a Monetary Policy Tool -- 5.8.2 Are Changes Toward Greater Transparency Reversible? -- 5.9 Post-crisis Communication Lessons -- 5.9.1 New Strategies in Stakeholders' Communication -- 5.9.2 Internal Communication -- 5.9.3 Caution and Prevention -- 5.10 Conclusions -- References -- Chapter 6: Public Perception of the NBR Communication After 2008 -- 6.1 Samples -- 6.2 Research Results -- 6.2.1 The NBR Communicated More, but Not by Much -- 6.2.2 Messages on Prominent Topics: Clear or Not? -- 6.2.3 Trust and Clarity Versus the Level of Knowledge of the NBR Activity -- 6.2.4 Who Informs the Public? -- 6.2.5 The Public Is Waiting for NBR on Facebook -- 6.2.6 Monetary Communication -- 6.2.7 Post-crisis Communication Lessons -- 6.3 Conclusions -- References -- Chapter 7: Framing the Giving in Payment Law by Online Media (2016) -- 7.1 Research Methodology -- 7.2 Competition Between Frames -- 7.3 The Most Visible Pros and Cons: Readers' Reaction -- 7.4 NBR's Public Communication, Under the Magnifying Glass of the Editorialists -- 7.5 Conclusions -- References -- Quoted Online Articles (From Coded Articles) -- Chapter 8: Conclusions -- 8.1 The Public Expects the Next Level of Transparency -- 8.2 The Road to Trust Must Be Paved with Education and Clarity -- 8.3 Blind Spots in the Media Light -- References -- Correction to: Blind Spots in the Spotlight | |
| 505 | 8 | |a Correction to: R. Iacob, Blind Spots in the Spotlight, Financial and Monetary Policy Studies 53 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-... -- Annexes -- Annex A: The Roles of the Main Stakeholders Involved in the Second Revolution in NBR's Communication, After 2008 -- Annex B: Interview Grid-Questions Regarding NBR's Communication, Addressed to NBR's Representatives -- Annex C: Online Survey on NBR's Communication Targeting the Specialized Public (Conducted During May-July 2018 Period) -- Annex D: Online Survey on NBR's Communication Targeting the General Public (Conducted Between July 2019 and October 2019) -- Annex E: Grid Analysis of Online News on the Giving in Payment Law (2016) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Communication in financial institutions | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Iacob, Raluca |t Blind Spots in the Spotlight |d Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2022 |z 9783031040665 |
| 912 | |a ZDB-30-PQE | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034554749 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/hwr/detail.action?docID=7018949 |l HWR01 |p ZDB-30-PQE |q HWR_PDA_PQE |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804185784507432960 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Iacob, Raluca |
| author_facet | Iacob, Raluca |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Iacob, Raluca |
| author_variant | r i ri |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV049293398 |
| collection | ZDB-30-PQE |
| contents | Intro -- Acknowledgments -- Disclaimer -- Contents -- About the Author -- List of Acronyms -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- Chapter 1: Introduction -- References -- Chapter 2: Public Communication of Central Banks: Theoretical Perspectives -- 2.1 Communication: A Monetary Policy Tool -- 2.2 Confidence in Central Banks -- 2.3 Strategic Communication of Central Banks -- 2.3.1 Language -- 2.3.2 Publics -- 2.3.3 Communication Channels -- 2.3.4 Tactics -- 2.4 Changes Triggered by the Great Recession -- References -- Chapter 3: Framing Theory -- 3.1 Framing Paradigm -- 3.2 News Framing and Public Opinion -- 3.3 Framing and Journalistic Practice: News Values-Gatekeeping -- 3.4 Framing and Public Relations -- 3.5 Competing Frames and Rhetoric of Elites -- 3.6 Framing the Financial Crisis -- 3.6.1 In the International Media -- 3.6.2 In the Romanian Press -- References -- Chapter 4: Research Design and Elements -- 4.1 Propagation of the 2008 Crisis in Romania -- 4.2 Communication Situations -- 4.3 Defining the Main Actors -- 4.4 Research Design -- 4.5 Research Elements -- 4.5.1 Research Questions -- 4.5.2 Research Methods -- 4.5.2.1 Interviews -- 4.5.2.2 Questionnaire-Based Sociological Surveys -- 4.5.2.3 Content Analysis -- References -- Chapter 5: NBR Representatives About the Change of Public Communication After 2008 -- 5.1 Setting the Scene: Pre-crisis Communication with Stakeholders -- 5.2 The Main Post-crisis Changes -- 5.2.1 Frequency of NBR Communication -- 5.2.2 Polyphony or Cacophony? -- 5.2.3 Diversification of Communication Topics -- 5.3 Jargon: A Double-Edged Sword -- 5.3.1 (Almost) Everything for Audiences -- 5.3.2 Challenges for Communicators -- 5.3.3 Limits of Simplification -- 5.4 Main Debate (2014-2016) -- 5.4.1 Greek Capital Banks -- 5.4.2 The Swiss Franc Loans Crisis -- 5.4.3 Giving in Payment Law 5.4.3.1 Stakeholder Play and Message Transmission -- 5.4.3.2 NBR: Advocate of Commercial Banks? -- 5.5 Trust in the NBR Post-crisis -- 5.5.1 NBR Reputation Locally and Internationally -- 5.5.2 Target Audience and Financial Education -- 5.5.3 Strategic Communication -- 5.6 The Most Effective Communication Channels -- 5.7 Should the NBR Go on Facebook? -- 5.8 Monetary Communication After 2008 -- 5.8.1 Evaluating Communication as a Monetary Policy Tool -- 5.8.2 Are Changes Toward Greater Transparency Reversible? -- 5.9 Post-crisis Communication Lessons -- 5.9.1 New Strategies in Stakeholders' Communication -- 5.9.2 Internal Communication -- 5.9.3 Caution and Prevention -- 5.10 Conclusions -- References -- Chapter 6: Public Perception of the NBR Communication After 2008 -- 6.1 Samples -- 6.2 Research Results -- 6.2.1 The NBR Communicated More, but Not by Much -- 6.2.2 Messages on Prominent Topics: Clear or Not? -- 6.2.3 Trust and Clarity Versus the Level of Knowledge of the NBR Activity -- 6.2.4 Who Informs the Public? -- 6.2.5 The Public Is Waiting for NBR on Facebook -- 6.2.6 Monetary Communication -- 6.2.7 Post-crisis Communication Lessons -- 6.3 Conclusions -- References -- Chapter 7: Framing the Giving in Payment Law by Online Media (2016) -- 7.1 Research Methodology -- 7.2 Competition Between Frames -- 7.3 The Most Visible Pros and Cons: Readers' Reaction -- 7.4 NBR's Public Communication, Under the Magnifying Glass of the Editorialists -- 7.5 Conclusions -- References -- Quoted Online Articles (From Coded Articles) -- Chapter 8: Conclusions -- 8.1 The Public Expects the Next Level of Transparency -- 8.2 The Road to Trust Must Be Paved with Education and Clarity -- 8.3 Blind Spots in the Media Light -- References -- Correction to: Blind Spots in the Spotlight Correction to: R. Iacob, Blind Spots in the Spotlight, Financial and Monetary Policy Studies 53 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-... -- Annexes -- Annex A: The Roles of the Main Stakeholders Involved in the Second Revolution in NBR's Communication, After 2008 -- Annex B: Interview Grid-Questions Regarding NBR's Communication, Addressed to NBR's Representatives -- Annex C: Online Survey on NBR's Communication Targeting the Specialized Public (Conducted During May-July 2018 Period) -- Annex D: Online Survey on NBR's Communication Targeting the General Public (Conducted Between July 2019 and October 2019) -- Annex E: Grid Analysis of Online News on the Giving in Payment Law (2016) |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-30-PQE)EBC7018949 (ZDB-30-PAD)EBC7018949 (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL7018949 (OCoLC)1333081864 (DE-599)BVBBV049293398 |
| dewey-full | 332.1109498 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 332 - Financial economics |
| dewey-raw | 332.1109498 |
| dewey-search | 332.1109498 |
| dewey-sort | 3332.1109498 |
| dewey-tens | 330 - Economics |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| edition | 1st ed |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05952nmm a2200433zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV049293398</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230822s2022 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783031040672</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-031-04067-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-30-PQE)EBC7018949</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-30-PAD)EBC7018949</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-89-EBL)EBL7018949</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1333081864</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV049293398</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-2070s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">332.1109498</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Iacob, Raluca</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Blind Spots in the Spotlight</subfield><subfield code="b">National Bank of Romania's Answers to the Financial Crisis Aftershocks from the Perspective of Central Bankers, the Public and the Media</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1st ed</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cham</subfield><subfield code="b">Springer International Publishing AG</subfield><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (237 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Financial and Monetary Policy Studies</subfield><subfield code="v">v.53</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Intro -- Acknowledgments -- Disclaimer -- Contents -- About the Author -- List of Acronyms -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- Chapter 1: Introduction -- References -- Chapter 2: Public Communication of Central Banks: Theoretical Perspectives -- 2.1 Communication: A Monetary Policy Tool -- 2.2 Confidence in Central Banks -- 2.3 Strategic Communication of Central Banks -- 2.3.1 Language -- 2.3.2 Publics -- 2.3.3 Communication Channels -- 2.3.4 Tactics -- 2.4 Changes Triggered by the Great Recession -- References -- Chapter 3: Framing Theory -- 3.1 Framing Paradigm -- 3.2 News Framing and Public Opinion -- 3.3 Framing and Journalistic Practice: News Values-Gatekeeping -- 3.4 Framing and Public Relations -- 3.5 Competing Frames and Rhetoric of Elites -- 3.6 Framing the Financial Crisis -- 3.6.1 In the International Media -- 3.6.2 In the Romanian Press -- References -- Chapter 4: Research Design and Elements -- 4.1 Propagation of the 2008 Crisis in Romania -- 4.2 Communication Situations -- 4.3 Defining the Main Actors -- 4.4 Research Design -- 4.5 Research Elements -- 4.5.1 Research Questions -- 4.5.2 Research Methods -- 4.5.2.1 Interviews -- 4.5.2.2 Questionnaire-Based Sociological Surveys -- 4.5.2.3 Content Analysis -- References -- Chapter 5: NBR Representatives About the Change of Public Communication After 2008 -- 5.1 Setting the Scene: Pre-crisis Communication with Stakeholders -- 5.2 The Main Post-crisis Changes -- 5.2.1 Frequency of NBR Communication -- 5.2.2 Polyphony or Cacophony? -- 5.2.3 Diversification of Communication Topics -- 5.3 Jargon: A Double-Edged Sword -- 5.3.1 (Almost) Everything for Audiences -- 5.3.2 Challenges for Communicators -- 5.3.3 Limits of Simplification -- 5.4 Main Debate (2014-2016) -- 5.4.1 Greek Capital Banks -- 5.4.2 The Swiss Franc Loans Crisis -- 5.4.3 Giving in Payment Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5.4.3.1 Stakeholder Play and Message Transmission -- 5.4.3.2 NBR: Advocate of Commercial Banks? -- 5.5 Trust in the NBR Post-crisis -- 5.5.1 NBR Reputation Locally and Internationally -- 5.5.2 Target Audience and Financial Education -- 5.5.3 Strategic Communication -- 5.6 The Most Effective Communication Channels -- 5.7 Should the NBR Go on Facebook? -- 5.8 Monetary Communication After 2008 -- 5.8.1 Evaluating Communication as a Monetary Policy Tool -- 5.8.2 Are Changes Toward Greater Transparency Reversible? -- 5.9 Post-crisis Communication Lessons -- 5.9.1 New Strategies in Stakeholders' Communication -- 5.9.2 Internal Communication -- 5.9.3 Caution and Prevention -- 5.10 Conclusions -- References -- Chapter 6: Public Perception of the NBR Communication After 2008 -- 6.1 Samples -- 6.2 Research Results -- 6.2.1 The NBR Communicated More, but Not by Much -- 6.2.2 Messages on Prominent Topics: Clear or Not? -- 6.2.3 Trust and Clarity Versus the Level of Knowledge of the NBR Activity -- 6.2.4 Who Informs the Public? -- 6.2.5 The Public Is Waiting for NBR on Facebook -- 6.2.6 Monetary Communication -- 6.2.7 Post-crisis Communication Lessons -- 6.3 Conclusions -- References -- Chapter 7: Framing the Giving in Payment Law by Online Media (2016) -- 7.1 Research Methodology -- 7.2 Competition Between Frames -- 7.3 The Most Visible Pros and Cons: Readers' Reaction -- 7.4 NBR's Public Communication, Under the Magnifying Glass of the Editorialists -- 7.5 Conclusions -- References -- Quoted Online Articles (From Coded Articles) -- Chapter 8: Conclusions -- 8.1 The Public Expects the Next Level of Transparency -- 8.2 The Road to Trust Must Be Paved with Education and Clarity -- 8.3 Blind Spots in the Media Light -- References -- Correction to: Blind Spots in the Spotlight</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Correction to: R. Iacob, Blind Spots in the Spotlight, Financial and Monetary Policy Studies 53 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-... -- Annexes -- Annex A: The Roles of the Main Stakeholders Involved in the Second Revolution in NBR's Communication, After 2008 -- Annex B: Interview Grid-Questions Regarding NBR's Communication, Addressed to NBR's Representatives -- Annex C: Online Survey on NBR's Communication Targeting the Specialized Public (Conducted During May-July 2018 Period) -- Annex D: Online Survey on NBR's Communication Targeting the General Public (Conducted Between July 2019 and October 2019) -- Annex E: Grid Analysis of Online News on the Giving in Payment Law (2016)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Communication in financial institutions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Iacob, Raluca</subfield><subfield code="t">Blind Spots in the Spotlight</subfield><subfield code="d">Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2022</subfield><subfield code="z">9783031040665</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-30-PQE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034554749</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/hwr/detail.action?docID=7018949</subfield><subfield code="l">HWR01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-30-PQE</subfield><subfield code="q">HWR_PDA_PQE</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV049293398 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T22:37:47Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T10:00:44Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9783031040672 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-034554749 |
| oclc_num | 1333081864 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-2070s |
| owner_facet | DE-2070s |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (237 Seiten) |
| psigel | ZDB-30-PQE ZDB-30-PQE HWR_PDA_PQE |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateSearch | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| publisher | Springer International Publishing AG |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Financial and Monetary Policy Studies |
| spelling | Iacob, Raluca Verfasser aut Blind Spots in the Spotlight National Bank of Romania's Answers to the Financial Crisis Aftershocks from the Perspective of Central Bankers, the Public and the Media 1st ed Cham Springer International Publishing AG 2022 ©2022 1 Online-Ressource (237 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Financial and Monetary Policy Studies v.53 Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources Intro -- Acknowledgments -- Disclaimer -- Contents -- About the Author -- List of Acronyms -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- Chapter 1: Introduction -- References -- Chapter 2: Public Communication of Central Banks: Theoretical Perspectives -- 2.1 Communication: A Monetary Policy Tool -- 2.2 Confidence in Central Banks -- 2.3 Strategic Communication of Central Banks -- 2.3.1 Language -- 2.3.2 Publics -- 2.3.3 Communication Channels -- 2.3.4 Tactics -- 2.4 Changes Triggered by the Great Recession -- References -- Chapter 3: Framing Theory -- 3.1 Framing Paradigm -- 3.2 News Framing and Public Opinion -- 3.3 Framing and Journalistic Practice: News Values-Gatekeeping -- 3.4 Framing and Public Relations -- 3.5 Competing Frames and Rhetoric of Elites -- 3.6 Framing the Financial Crisis -- 3.6.1 In the International Media -- 3.6.2 In the Romanian Press -- References -- Chapter 4: Research Design and Elements -- 4.1 Propagation of the 2008 Crisis in Romania -- 4.2 Communication Situations -- 4.3 Defining the Main Actors -- 4.4 Research Design -- 4.5 Research Elements -- 4.5.1 Research Questions -- 4.5.2 Research Methods -- 4.5.2.1 Interviews -- 4.5.2.2 Questionnaire-Based Sociological Surveys -- 4.5.2.3 Content Analysis -- References -- Chapter 5: NBR Representatives About the Change of Public Communication After 2008 -- 5.1 Setting the Scene: Pre-crisis Communication with Stakeholders -- 5.2 The Main Post-crisis Changes -- 5.2.1 Frequency of NBR Communication -- 5.2.2 Polyphony or Cacophony? -- 5.2.3 Diversification of Communication Topics -- 5.3 Jargon: A Double-Edged Sword -- 5.3.1 (Almost) Everything for Audiences -- 5.3.2 Challenges for Communicators -- 5.3.3 Limits of Simplification -- 5.4 Main Debate (2014-2016) -- 5.4.1 Greek Capital Banks -- 5.4.2 The Swiss Franc Loans Crisis -- 5.4.3 Giving in Payment Law 5.4.3.1 Stakeholder Play and Message Transmission -- 5.4.3.2 NBR: Advocate of Commercial Banks? -- 5.5 Trust in the NBR Post-crisis -- 5.5.1 NBR Reputation Locally and Internationally -- 5.5.2 Target Audience and Financial Education -- 5.5.3 Strategic Communication -- 5.6 The Most Effective Communication Channels -- 5.7 Should the NBR Go on Facebook? -- 5.8 Monetary Communication After 2008 -- 5.8.1 Evaluating Communication as a Monetary Policy Tool -- 5.8.2 Are Changes Toward Greater Transparency Reversible? -- 5.9 Post-crisis Communication Lessons -- 5.9.1 New Strategies in Stakeholders' Communication -- 5.9.2 Internal Communication -- 5.9.3 Caution and Prevention -- 5.10 Conclusions -- References -- Chapter 6: Public Perception of the NBR Communication After 2008 -- 6.1 Samples -- 6.2 Research Results -- 6.2.1 The NBR Communicated More, but Not by Much -- 6.2.2 Messages on Prominent Topics: Clear or Not? -- 6.2.3 Trust and Clarity Versus the Level of Knowledge of the NBR Activity -- 6.2.4 Who Informs the Public? -- 6.2.5 The Public Is Waiting for NBR on Facebook -- 6.2.6 Monetary Communication -- 6.2.7 Post-crisis Communication Lessons -- 6.3 Conclusions -- References -- Chapter 7: Framing the Giving in Payment Law by Online Media (2016) -- 7.1 Research Methodology -- 7.2 Competition Between Frames -- 7.3 The Most Visible Pros and Cons: Readers' Reaction -- 7.4 NBR's Public Communication, Under the Magnifying Glass of the Editorialists -- 7.5 Conclusions -- References -- Quoted Online Articles (From Coded Articles) -- Chapter 8: Conclusions -- 8.1 The Public Expects the Next Level of Transparency -- 8.2 The Road to Trust Must Be Paved with Education and Clarity -- 8.3 Blind Spots in the Media Light -- References -- Correction to: Blind Spots in the Spotlight Correction to: R. Iacob, Blind Spots in the Spotlight, Financial and Monetary Policy Studies 53 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-... -- Annexes -- Annex A: The Roles of the Main Stakeholders Involved in the Second Revolution in NBR's Communication, After 2008 -- Annex B: Interview Grid-Questions Regarding NBR's Communication, Addressed to NBR's Representatives -- Annex C: Online Survey on NBR's Communication Targeting the Specialized Public (Conducted During May-July 2018 Period) -- Annex D: Online Survey on NBR's Communication Targeting the General Public (Conducted Between July 2019 and October 2019) -- Annex E: Grid Analysis of Online News on the Giving in Payment Law (2016) Communication in financial institutions Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Iacob, Raluca Blind Spots in the Spotlight Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2022 9783031040665 |
| spellingShingle | Iacob, Raluca Blind Spots in the Spotlight National Bank of Romania's Answers to the Financial Crisis Aftershocks from the Perspective of Central Bankers, the Public and the Media Intro -- Acknowledgments -- Disclaimer -- Contents -- About the Author -- List of Acronyms -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- Chapter 1: Introduction -- References -- Chapter 2: Public Communication of Central Banks: Theoretical Perspectives -- 2.1 Communication: A Monetary Policy Tool -- 2.2 Confidence in Central Banks -- 2.3 Strategic Communication of Central Banks -- 2.3.1 Language -- 2.3.2 Publics -- 2.3.3 Communication Channels -- 2.3.4 Tactics -- 2.4 Changes Triggered by the Great Recession -- References -- Chapter 3: Framing Theory -- 3.1 Framing Paradigm -- 3.2 News Framing and Public Opinion -- 3.3 Framing and Journalistic Practice: News Values-Gatekeeping -- 3.4 Framing and Public Relations -- 3.5 Competing Frames and Rhetoric of Elites -- 3.6 Framing the Financial Crisis -- 3.6.1 In the International Media -- 3.6.2 In the Romanian Press -- References -- Chapter 4: Research Design and Elements -- 4.1 Propagation of the 2008 Crisis in Romania -- 4.2 Communication Situations -- 4.3 Defining the Main Actors -- 4.4 Research Design -- 4.5 Research Elements -- 4.5.1 Research Questions -- 4.5.2 Research Methods -- 4.5.2.1 Interviews -- 4.5.2.2 Questionnaire-Based Sociological Surveys -- 4.5.2.3 Content Analysis -- References -- Chapter 5: NBR Representatives About the Change of Public Communication After 2008 -- 5.1 Setting the Scene: Pre-crisis Communication with Stakeholders -- 5.2 The Main Post-crisis Changes -- 5.2.1 Frequency of NBR Communication -- 5.2.2 Polyphony or Cacophony? -- 5.2.3 Diversification of Communication Topics -- 5.3 Jargon: A Double-Edged Sword -- 5.3.1 (Almost) Everything for Audiences -- 5.3.2 Challenges for Communicators -- 5.3.3 Limits of Simplification -- 5.4 Main Debate (2014-2016) -- 5.4.1 Greek Capital Banks -- 5.4.2 The Swiss Franc Loans Crisis -- 5.4.3 Giving in Payment Law 5.4.3.1 Stakeholder Play and Message Transmission -- 5.4.3.2 NBR: Advocate of Commercial Banks? -- 5.5 Trust in the NBR Post-crisis -- 5.5.1 NBR Reputation Locally and Internationally -- 5.5.2 Target Audience and Financial Education -- 5.5.3 Strategic Communication -- 5.6 The Most Effective Communication Channels -- 5.7 Should the NBR Go on Facebook? -- 5.8 Monetary Communication After 2008 -- 5.8.1 Evaluating Communication as a Monetary Policy Tool -- 5.8.2 Are Changes Toward Greater Transparency Reversible? -- 5.9 Post-crisis Communication Lessons -- 5.9.1 New Strategies in Stakeholders' Communication -- 5.9.2 Internal Communication -- 5.9.3 Caution and Prevention -- 5.10 Conclusions -- References -- Chapter 6: Public Perception of the NBR Communication After 2008 -- 6.1 Samples -- 6.2 Research Results -- 6.2.1 The NBR Communicated More, but Not by Much -- 6.2.2 Messages on Prominent Topics: Clear or Not? -- 6.2.3 Trust and Clarity Versus the Level of Knowledge of the NBR Activity -- 6.2.4 Who Informs the Public? -- 6.2.5 The Public Is Waiting for NBR on Facebook -- 6.2.6 Monetary Communication -- 6.2.7 Post-crisis Communication Lessons -- 6.3 Conclusions -- References -- Chapter 7: Framing the Giving in Payment Law by Online Media (2016) -- 7.1 Research Methodology -- 7.2 Competition Between Frames -- 7.3 The Most Visible Pros and Cons: Readers' Reaction -- 7.4 NBR's Public Communication, Under the Magnifying Glass of the Editorialists -- 7.5 Conclusions -- References -- Quoted Online Articles (From Coded Articles) -- Chapter 8: Conclusions -- 8.1 The Public Expects the Next Level of Transparency -- 8.2 The Road to Trust Must Be Paved with Education and Clarity -- 8.3 Blind Spots in the Media Light -- References -- Correction to: Blind Spots in the Spotlight Correction to: R. Iacob, Blind Spots in the Spotlight, Financial and Monetary Policy Studies 53 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-... -- Annexes -- Annex A: The Roles of the Main Stakeholders Involved in the Second Revolution in NBR's Communication, After 2008 -- Annex B: Interview Grid-Questions Regarding NBR's Communication, Addressed to NBR's Representatives -- Annex C: Online Survey on NBR's Communication Targeting the Specialized Public (Conducted During May-July 2018 Period) -- Annex D: Online Survey on NBR's Communication Targeting the General Public (Conducted Between July 2019 and October 2019) -- Annex E: Grid Analysis of Online News on the Giving in Payment Law (2016) Communication in financial institutions |
| title | Blind Spots in the Spotlight National Bank of Romania's Answers to the Financial Crisis Aftershocks from the Perspective of Central Bankers, the Public and the Media |
| title_auth | Blind Spots in the Spotlight National Bank of Romania's Answers to the Financial Crisis Aftershocks from the Perspective of Central Bankers, the Public and the Media |
| title_exact_search | Blind Spots in the Spotlight National Bank of Romania's Answers to the Financial Crisis Aftershocks from the Perspective of Central Bankers, the Public and the Media |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Blind Spots in the Spotlight National Bank of Romania's Answers to the Financial Crisis Aftershocks from the Perspective of Central Bankers, the Public and the Media |
| title_full | Blind Spots in the Spotlight National Bank of Romania's Answers to the Financial Crisis Aftershocks from the Perspective of Central Bankers, the Public and the Media |
| title_fullStr | Blind Spots in the Spotlight National Bank of Romania's Answers to the Financial Crisis Aftershocks from the Perspective of Central Bankers, the Public and the Media |
| title_full_unstemmed | Blind Spots in the Spotlight National Bank of Romania's Answers to the Financial Crisis Aftershocks from the Perspective of Central Bankers, the Public and the Media |
| title_short | Blind Spots in the Spotlight |
| title_sort | blind spots in the spotlight national bank of romania s answers to the financial crisis aftershocks from the perspective of central bankers the public and the media |
| title_sub | National Bank of Romania's Answers to the Financial Crisis Aftershocks from the Perspective of Central Bankers, the Public and the Media |
| topic | Communication in financial institutions |
| topic_facet | Communication in financial institutions |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT iacobraluca blindspotsinthespotlightnationalbankofromaniasanswerstothefinancialcrisisaftershocksfromtheperspectiveofcentralbankersthepublicandthemedia |