Personality merchandising and the GDPR: an insoluble conflict?

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Sun, Jingzhou (VerfasserIn)
Format: Abschlussarbeit Buch
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Baden-Baden Nomos 2022
Augsburg ; München ; WashingtonDC MIPLC, Munich Intellectual Property Law Center
Ausgabe:1st edition
Schriftenreihe:MIPLC Studies Volume 42
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Inhaltstext
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000008cb4500
001 BV048505506
003 DE-604
005 20230314
007 t
008 221011s2022 gw m||| 00||| eng d
015 |a 22,N39  |2 dnb 
016 7 |a 1268464074  |2 DE-101 
020 |a 9783756003020  |c Broschur : EUR 79.00 (DE)  |9 978-3-7560-0302-0 
020 |a 3756003027  |9 3-7560-0302-7 
024 3 |a 9783756003020 
035 |a (OCoLC)1346986378 
035 |a (DE-599)DNB1268464074 
040 |a DE-604  |b ger 
041 0 |a eng 
044 |a gw  |c XA-DE-BW 
049 |a DE-M382  |a DE-19  |a DE-12  |a DE-384 
084 |a PZ 4700  |0 (DE-625)141182:  |2 rvk 
084 |8 1\p  |a 340  |2 23sdnb 
100 1 |a Sun, Jingzhou  |e Verfasser  |0 (DE-588)1190240947  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Personality merchandising and the GDPR: an insoluble conflict?  |c Jingzhou Sun 
250 |a 1st edition 
264 1 |a Baden-Baden  |b Nomos  |c 2022 
264 1 |a Augsburg ; München ; WashingtonDC  |b MIPLC, Munich Intellectual Property Law Center 
300 |a 282 Seiten  |c 22.7 cm x 15.3 cm 
336 |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
490 1 |a MIPLC Studies  |v Volume 42 
502 |b Dissertation  |c Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München  |d 2022 
610 2 7 |a Europäische Union  |t Datenschutz-Grundverordnung  |0 (DE-588)1105568555  |2 gnd  |9 rswk-swf 
650 0 7 |a Merchandising  |0 (DE-588)4138191-9  |2 gnd  |9 rswk-swf 
655 7 |0 (DE-588)4113937-9  |a Hochschulschrift  |2 gnd-content 
689 0 0 |a Europäische Union  |t Datenschutz-Grundverordnung  |0 (DE-588)1105568555  |D u 
689 0 1 |a Merchandising  |0 (DE-588)4138191-9  |D s 
689 0 |5 DE-604 
710 2 |a Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft  |0 (DE-588)117513-0  |4 pbl 
776 0 8 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Online-Ausgabe  |z 978-3-7489-3692-3 
830 0 |a MIPLC Studies  |v Volume 42  |w (DE-604)BV035044599  |9 42 
856 4 2 |m X:MVB  |q text/html  |u http://deposit.dnb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?id=c25e1b4b89e44de4a42b45a16328df0f&prov=M&dok_var=1&dok_ext=htm  |3 Inhaltstext 
856 4 2 |m DNB Datenaustausch  |q application/pdf  |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033882671&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA  |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis 
999 |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033882671 
883 1 |8 1\p  |a vlb  |d 20220920  |q DE-101  |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#vlb 

Datensatz im Suchindex

_version_ 1804184477952376832
adam_text TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 15 ZUSAMMENFASSUNG 19 INTRODUCTION 21 1. THE RESEARCH QUESTIONS 21 2. LIMITING THE SUBJECT OF THE RESEARCH AND THE TERMINOLOGY 22 3. THE CURRENT STATE OF RESEARCH REGARDING THE REGULATION OF THE GDPR IN MERCHANDISING 25 4. METHODOLOGY AND STRUCTURE OF THE DISSERTATION 27 PART I SUBSTANTIVE LEGAL PROTECTION FOR MERCHANDISING IN GERMANY 28 1. INTRODUCTION 28 2. MERCHANDISING UNDER TORT LAW 30 2.1 THE LAW AGAINST UNAUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING 30 2.1.1 THE RIGHT TO ONE S IMAGE IN GERMAN LAW 30 2.1.2 THE CASE LAW OF UNAUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING 32 2.1.3 CASES AT THE MARGINS 35 2.2 REMEDIES FOR TORTIOUS UNAUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING 39 2.2.1 MONETARY REMEDIES 39 2.2.2 NON-MONETARY REMEDIES 44 2.3 THE JUDGMENT IN THE CLICKBAIT CASE 46 2.4 PRELIMINARY SUMMARY 49 3. MERCHANDISING IN CONTRACT PRACTICE 51 3.1 CONSENT IN MERCHANDISING AGREEMENTS 51 3.1.1 THE LEGAL NATURE OF CONSENT 51 (1) CONSENT AS A LEGAL ACT AND THE LADDER OF PERMISSIONS 51 (2) THE REVOCABILITY OF CONSENT FOR MERCHANDISING 56 3.1.2 THE CONSTRUCTION OF CONSENT IN MERCHANDISING AGREEMENTS 58 3.2 MERCHANDISING AGREEMENTS 61 3.2.1 TYPES OF MERCHANDISING AGREEMENTS 61 7 3.2.2 TYPICAL CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS FOR THE PERSON DEPICTED IN MERCHANDISING AGREEMENTS 63 (1) THE RIGHT TO ACCESS INFORMATION AND ACCOUNTING 63 (2) THE RIGHT FOR RESERVATION FOR APPROVAL 64 (3) AN EXTRAORDINARY OPT-OUT RIGHT 65 (4) DISPOSABLE CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS 65 3.3 PRELIMINARY SUMMARY 68 4. CONCLUSIONS 68 PART II MERCHANDISING UNDER THE GDPR 71 1. INTRODUCTION 71 2. THE APPLICABILITY OF THE GDPR IN MERCHANDISING 72 2.1 A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO THE GDPR 72 2.2 THE MATERIAL AND TERRITORIAL SCOPE OF THE GDPR 77 2.3 QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICABILITY OF THE GDPR IN MERCHANDISING 80 2.3.1 EXCEPTIONS FOR THE TERRITORIAL APPLICABILITY 81 2.3.2 THE LEEWAY FOR NATIONAL LAWS OFFERED BY ART. 85 GDPR 84 2.4 CONCLUSIONS 87 3. UNAUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING UNDER THE GDPR 88 3.1 THE UNLAWFULNESS OF UNAUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING CASES UNDER THE GDPR 88 3.1.1 APPLYING ART. 6 (1) (F) GDPR IN UNAUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING CASES 88 (1) THE PRINCIPLE OF ACCOUNTABILITY REGARDING THE TEST GRID OF ART. 6 (1) (F) GDPR 88 (2) THE NECESSITY BETWEEN DATA PROCESSING AND THE PURSUIT OF THE INTERESTS 91 (3) THE INTERFERED INTERESTS OF DATA SUBJECTS 92 (4) THE BALANCING OF CONFLICTING INTERESTS 93 3.1.2 CASE ANALYSIS OF ART. 6 (1) (F) GDPR 96 (1) EVALUATION OF THE GERMAN DECISIONS 96 I. LACK OF LEGAL BASIS 96 II. SOME MAIN REQUIREMENTS IN THE GDPR OMITTED 97 III. INACCURATE UNDERSTANDING OF THE TERMINOLOGY IN THE GDPR 98 (2) TO APPLY ART. 6 (1) (F) GDPR RIGHTFULLY 101 8 3.2 CIVIL DAMAGES UNDER THE GDPR 103 3.2.1 ART. 82 GDPR AS THE LEGAL BASIS 103 (1) STATUTORY CONDITIONS AND CONTESTED APPLICATION IN GERMANY 103 (2) EVALUATION 109 3.2.2 REMEDIES FOR DATA SUBJECTS IN UNAUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING CASES 111 (1) INFRINGEMENTS OF ART. 6 ( 1) (F) GDPR 111 (2) INFRINGEMENTS OF THE PRINCIPLES OF DATA PROCESSING? 114 (3) INFRINGEMENTS OF THE DATA SUBJECT S RIGHTS 116 I. THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION 117 II. THE RIGHT TO OBJECT 119 III. THE RIGHT TO ERASURE (TO BE FORGOTTEN) 120 IV. OTHER RIGHTS? 122 3.3 PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS 123 4. AUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING UNDER THE GDPR 124 4.1 THE APPLICABILITY OF ART. 9 GDPR IN MERCHANDISING CASES? 124 4.1.1 SPECIFIC PROTECTION FOR SENSITIVE DATA 124 (1) THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS IN ART. 9 GDPR 124 (2) THE ACADEMIC CONTROVERSY OVER THE CRITERIA 127 (3) EVALUATION 127 4.1.2 CONCLUSIONS 129 4.2 CONSENT AS THE LAWFUL GROUND FOR DATA PROCESSING UNDER THE GDPR 132 4.2.1 THE COLLISION OF NORMS (NORMENKOLLISION) BETWEEN THE GDPR AND THE KUG 132 4.2.2 CONSENT AS THE LAWFUL GROUND IN MERCHANDISING 133 (1) CONDITIONS FOR THE VALIDITY OF CONSENT AND THE CONSEQUENCE OF OMISSIONS 133 (2) APPLYING ART. 6(1) (A) GDPR IN AUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING CASES 137 I. MERCHANDISING CONTRACTS NO LONGER BINDING 137 II. AGENCY-MERCHANDISING CONTRACTS AT ISSUE 139 III. RIGOROUS CONDITIONS FOR VALIDITY OF CONSENT 141 IV. THE VOLUNTARINESS OF CONSENT GIVEN BY YOUNG MODELS? 142 4.2.3 CONCLUSIONS 143 4.3 CONTRACTS AS THE LAWFUL GROUND? 145 4.3.1 CONTRACTS AS THE LAWFUL GROUND IN MERCHANDISING 145 (1) THE AMBIT OF ART. 6 (1) (B) GDPR 145 9 (2) ART. 6 (1) (B) GDPR INAPPLICABLE TO AUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING 148 4.3.2 ANY OTHER POSSIBILITIES TO CONQUER THE REVOCABILITY OF CONSENT? 151 (1) CUMULATION OF LAWFUL GROUNDS 151 (2) ANY OTHER ALTERNATIVES? 153 4.4 PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS 155 4.5 DATA SUBJECT S RIGHTS IN MERCHANDISING 156 4.5.1 MANDATORY RIGHTS UNDER THE GDPR 156 4.5.2 THE EXECUTION OF THE DATA SUBJECT S RIGHTS 159 (1) THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION AND ITS ASSOCIATED RIGHTS (ART. 12-15) 159 (2) THE RIGHT TO RECTIFICATION (ART. 16) 162 (3) THE RIGHT TO ERASURE (ART. 17) 164 (4) THE RIGHT TO PORTABILITY (ART. 20) 166 4.5.3 PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS 168 5. CONCLUSIONS 168 PART III THE COMPARISON BETWEEN THE GERMAN LEGAL REGIME AND THE GDPR REGARDING MERCHANDISING 171 1. INTRODUCTION 171 2. THE GDPR S REGULATION IN MERCHANDISING IN CONTRAST WITH THE GERMAN LEGAL REGIME 172 2.1 PROBLEMS ARISING FROM THE APPLICATION OF THE GDPR IN UNAUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING 172 2.1.1 OVERPROTECTION FOR DATA SUBJECTS? 172 (1) MORE MORAL DAMAGES UNDER THE GDPR? 172 (2) OVERPOWERING DATA SUBJECT S RIGHTS? 173 2.1.2 UNDER-PROTECTION FOR PROFESSIONAL MODELS AND CELEBRITIES 174 (1) LACK OF NON-MONETARY REMEDIES IN THE GDPR? 174 (2) INCOMPARABLE MATERIAL DAMAGES UNDER THE GDPR TO GERMAN LAW 175 (3) THE LONG-TERM CONSEQUENCES OF THE RETICENCE 177 2.1.3 INTERIM SUMMARY 179 2.2 PROMINENT CHALLENGES TO MERCHANDISING CONTRACTS IN CONTRAST WITH GERMAN LAW 181 2.2.1 FROM PACTA SUNT SERVANDA TO THE ANYTIME REVOCABILITY 181 2.2.2 STRICTER CONDITIONS FOR VALID CONSENT UNDER THE GDPR 182 10 2.2.3 THE EXCESSIVE BURDEN FOR MERCHANDISERS IMPOSED BY THE DATA SUBJECT S RIGHTS 2.2.4 INTERIM CONCLUSION 2.3 INAPPROPRIATE APPLICATION OF THE GDPR IN MERCHANDISING 3. POSSIBLE EXPLANATIONS FOR THE INCOMPATIBILITY 3.1 POSSIBLE REASONS FOR THE HIGH-LEVEL DATA PROTECTION OF THE GDPR 3.1.1 THE APPROACH OF ONE SIZE FITS FOR ALL 3.1.2 REASONS FOR THE RETICENCE TOWARDS THE COMMERCIAL VALUE OF PERSONAL DATA 3.1.3 PROTECTIVE PROVISIONS STEMMING FROM THE DATA PATERNALISM 3.2 UNREASONABLE DIRECT APPLICATION OF THE GDPR IN MERCHANDISING 3.2.1 MERCHANDISING IS FORGOTTEN BY THE GDPR 3.2.2 UNSUITABLE EXPLANATIONS FOR MERCHANDISING 4. CONCLUSIONS PART IV SOLUTIONS TO SETTLE THE INCONSISTENCIES 1. DIRECT APPLICATION OF THE KUG IN MERCHANDISING CASES BASED ON ART. 85 (1) GDPR 1.1 ART. 85 (1) GDPR AS A STAND-ALONE OPENING CLAUSE 1.2 COUNTERARGUMENTS FOR THE INDEPENDENT NATURE OF ART. 85 (1) GDPR 1.3 EVALUATION 2. ART. 6 (1) (F) GDPR AS AN ADDITIONAL LAWFUL GROUND FOR AUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING 2.1 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS PROPOSAL 2.1.1 THE APPLICATION OF ART. 6 (1) (F) GDPR IN A CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP 2.1.2 CONDUCIVE FOR THE BINDINGNESS OF A MERCHANDISING RELATIONSHIP 2.2 LIMITATIONS OF THIS PROPOSAL 2.2.1 LEGAL UNCERTAINTY AND OVERPRESSURE ON THE GENERAL CLAUSE 2.2.2 FUNDAMENTALLY INCOMPATIBLE IN AUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING SCENARIOS 2.2.3 UNABLE TO ADDRESS THE LONG-TERM CONSEQUENCES 184 184 185 186 186 186 188 192 195 195 200 203 206 206 206 209 211 214 214 214 216 217 217 218 219 11 3. RECALIBRATING THE APPLICATION OF ART. 6 (1) (B) GDPR IN THE B2B MERCHANDISING 220 3.1 OTHER POSSIBILITIES OF THE INTERPRETATION OF ART. 6 (1) (B) GDPR 220 3.1.1 THE EDPB S GUIDELINES AND SOME SCHOLARS PROPOSITION 220 3.1.2 A RELATIVELY LIBERAL READING OF THE AMBIT OF ART. 6 (1) (B) GDPR BY SOME SCHOLARS 222 3.2 THE OBJECTIONS TO THESE INTERPRETATION 223 3.2.1 CRITICISM OF THE EDPB S GUIDELINES AND EVALUATION 223 3.2.2 POSSIBLE COUNTERARGUMENTS 225 3.3 APPLYING ART. 6 (1) (B) GDPR TO MERCHANDISING IN THE B2B CONTEXT 229 3.3.1 ARGUMENTS AND ADVANTAGES OF THIS SOLUTION 229 (1) THE LEGAL BASIS FOR THIS SOLUTION 229 (2) THE EDPS RESISTANCE TOWARDS MERCHANDISING IN THE B2B CONTEXT? 231 (3) THE ENFORCEMENT OF THIS SOLUTION 232 (4) WELL-BALANCED PROTECTION FOR BOTH SIDES 234 3.3.2 DISADVANTAGES AND OBJECTIONS FOR THIS SOLUTION 236 (1) BORDERLESS APPLICATION OF ART. 6 (1) (B) GDPR IN SUB-LICENSING SITUATIONS 236 (2) UNDER-PROTECTION FOR DATA SUBJECTS IN B2C CONTEXTS 237 (3) ART. 6 (1) (B) GDPR AS A GENERAL CLAUSE FOR FAIR CONTRACTS 238 3.4 SUMMARY 240 4. THE PROPOSAL FOR A TWO-TIER INTERPRETATION OF CONSENT 241 4.1 THE TWO-TIER INTERPRETATION OF CONSENT 241 4.1.1 INTRODUCTION OF THIS SOLUTION 241 (1) THE CONTENT OF THIS PROPOSAL 241 (2) ITS ENFORCEMENT 242 (3) ARGUMENTATION BASED ON THE (INTER-)SYSTEMATIC INTERPRETATION 244 (4) QUESTIONING THE UNLIMITED DATA PATERNALISM IN PRIVATE SECTOR 245 (5) UNIVERSALLY VARIOUS CONNOTATIONS OF CONSENT 247 4.1.2 COUNTERARGUMENTS TO THIS PROPOSAL 249 (1) THE OPINIONS OF AUTHORITIES AS WELL AS THE (INTRA-)SYSTEMATIC INTERPRETATION 249 (2) CHALLENGES TO ITS PRACTICABILITY 252 4.2 CONCLUSIONS 253 12 5. THE COMPARISON OF THE SOLUTIONS AND THE RESULT 254 5.1 UNSUITABLE SOLUTIONS 1 AND 2 254 5.2 THE COMPARISON BETWEEN SOLUTION 3 AND 4 256 5.3 THE RESULT 257 PART V CONCLUSIONS 259 1. THE TRADITIONAL GERMAN APPROACH 259 2. MERCHANDISING UNDER THE GDPR 260 3. DIVERGENCES AND PROBLEMS 262 4. SOLUTIONS 263 BIBLIOGRAPHY 265 13
adam_txt TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 15 ZUSAMMENFASSUNG 19 INTRODUCTION 21 1. THE RESEARCH QUESTIONS 21 2. LIMITING THE SUBJECT OF THE RESEARCH AND THE TERMINOLOGY 22 3. THE CURRENT STATE OF RESEARCH REGARDING THE REGULATION OF THE GDPR IN MERCHANDISING 25 4. METHODOLOGY AND STRUCTURE OF THE DISSERTATION 27 PART I SUBSTANTIVE LEGAL PROTECTION FOR MERCHANDISING IN GERMANY 28 1. INTRODUCTION 28 2. MERCHANDISING UNDER TORT LAW 30 2.1 THE LAW AGAINST UNAUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING 30 2.1.1 THE RIGHT TO ONE ' S IMAGE IN GERMAN LAW 30 2.1.2 THE CASE LAW OF UNAUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING 32 2.1.3 CASES AT THE MARGINS 35 2.2 REMEDIES FOR TORTIOUS UNAUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING 39 2.2.1 MONETARY REMEDIES 39 2.2.2 NON-MONETARY REMEDIES 44 2.3 THE JUDGMENT IN THE CLICKBAIT CASE 46 2.4 PRELIMINARY SUMMARY 49 3. MERCHANDISING IN CONTRACT PRACTICE 51 3.1 CONSENT IN MERCHANDISING AGREEMENTS 51 3.1.1 THE LEGAL NATURE OF CONSENT 51 (1) CONSENT AS A LEGAL ACT AND THE LADDER OF PERMISSIONS 51 (2) THE REVOCABILITY OF CONSENT FOR MERCHANDISING 56 3.1.2 THE CONSTRUCTION OF CONSENT IN MERCHANDISING AGREEMENTS 58 3.2 MERCHANDISING AGREEMENTS 61 3.2.1 TYPES OF MERCHANDISING AGREEMENTS 61 7 3.2.2 TYPICAL CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS FOR THE PERSON DEPICTED IN MERCHANDISING AGREEMENTS 63 (1) THE RIGHT TO ACCESS INFORMATION AND ACCOUNTING 63 (2) THE RIGHT FOR RESERVATION FOR APPROVAL 64 (3) AN EXTRAORDINARY OPT-OUT RIGHT 65 (4) DISPOSABLE CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS 65 3.3 PRELIMINARY SUMMARY 68 4. CONCLUSIONS 68 PART II MERCHANDISING UNDER THE GDPR 71 1. INTRODUCTION 71 2. THE APPLICABILITY OF THE GDPR IN MERCHANDISING 72 2.1 A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO THE GDPR 72 2.2 THE MATERIAL AND TERRITORIAL SCOPE OF THE GDPR 77 2.3 QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICABILITY OF THE GDPR IN MERCHANDISING 80 2.3.1 EXCEPTIONS FOR THE TERRITORIAL APPLICABILITY 81 2.3.2 THE LEEWAY FOR NATIONAL LAWS OFFERED BY ART. 85 GDPR 84 2.4 CONCLUSIONS 87 3. UNAUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING UNDER THE GDPR 88 3.1 THE UNLAWFULNESS OF UNAUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING CASES UNDER THE GDPR 88 3.1.1 APPLYING ART. 6 (1) (F) GDPR IN UNAUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING CASES 88 (1) THE PRINCIPLE OF ACCOUNTABILITY REGARDING THE " TEST GRID " OF ART. 6 (1) (F) GDPR 88 (2) THE NECESSITY BETWEEN DATA PROCESSING AND THE PURSUIT OF THE INTERESTS 91 (3) THE INTERFERED INTERESTS OF DATA SUBJECTS 92 (4) THE BALANCING OF CONFLICTING INTERESTS 93 3.1.2 CASE ANALYSIS OF ART. 6 (1) (F) GDPR 96 (1) EVALUATION OF THE GERMAN DECISIONS 96 I. LACK OF LEGAL BASIS 96 II. SOME MAIN REQUIREMENTS IN THE GDPR OMITTED 97 III. INACCURATE UNDERSTANDING OF THE TERMINOLOGY IN THE GDPR 98 (2) TO APPLY ART. 6 (1) (F) GDPR RIGHTFULLY 101 8 3.2 CIVIL DAMAGES UNDER THE GDPR 103 3.2.1 ART. 82 GDPR AS THE LEGAL BASIS 103 (1) STATUTORY CONDITIONS AND CONTESTED APPLICATION IN GERMANY 103 (2) EVALUATION 109 3.2.2 REMEDIES FOR DATA SUBJECTS IN UNAUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING CASES 111 (1) INFRINGEMENTS OF ART. 6 ( 1) (F) GDPR 111 (2) INFRINGEMENTS OF THE PRINCIPLES OF DATA PROCESSING? 114 (3) INFRINGEMENTS OF THE DATA SUBJECT ' S RIGHTS 116 I. THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION 117 II. THE RIGHT TO OBJECT 119 III. THE RIGHT TO ERASURE (TO BE FORGOTTEN) 120 IV. OTHER RIGHTS? 122 3.3 PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS 123 4. AUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING UNDER THE GDPR 124 4.1 THE APPLICABILITY OF ART. 9 GDPR IN MERCHANDISING CASES? 124 4.1.1 SPECIFIC PROTECTION FOR SENSITIVE DATA 124 (1) THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS IN ART. 9 GDPR 124 (2) THE ACADEMIC CONTROVERSY OVER THE CRITERIA 127 (3) EVALUATION 127 4.1.2 CONCLUSIONS 129 4.2 CONSENT AS THE LAWFUL GROUND FOR DATA PROCESSING UNDER THE GDPR 132 4.2.1 THE COLLISION OF NORMS (NORMENKOLLISION) BETWEEN THE GDPR AND THE KUG 132 4.2.2 CONSENT AS THE LAWFUL GROUND IN MERCHANDISING 133 (1) CONDITIONS FOR THE VALIDITY OF CONSENT AND THE CONSEQUENCE OF OMISSIONS 133 (2) APPLYING ART. 6(1) (A) GDPR IN AUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING CASES 137 I. MERCHANDISING CONTRACTS NO LONGER BINDING 137 II. AGENCY-MERCHANDISING CONTRACTS AT ISSUE 139 III. RIGOROUS CONDITIONS FOR VALIDITY OF CONSENT 141 IV. THE VOLUNTARINESS OF CONSENT GIVEN BY YOUNG MODELS? 142 4.2.3 CONCLUSIONS 143 4.3 CONTRACTS AS THE LAWFUL GROUND? 145 4.3.1 CONTRACTS AS THE LAWFUL GROUND IN MERCHANDISING 145 (1) THE AMBIT OF ART. 6 (1) (B) GDPR 145 9 (2) ART. 6 (1) (B) GDPR INAPPLICABLE TO AUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING 148 4.3.2 ANY OTHER POSSIBILITIES TO CONQUER THE REVOCABILITY OF CONSENT? 151 (1) CUMULATION OF LAWFUL GROUNDS 151 (2) ANY OTHER ALTERNATIVES? 153 4.4 PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS 155 4.5 DATA SUBJECT ' S RIGHTS IN MERCHANDISING 156 4.5.1 MANDATORY RIGHTS UNDER THE GDPR 156 4.5.2 THE EXECUTION OF THE DATA SUBJECT ' S RIGHTS 159 (1) THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION AND ITS ASSOCIATED RIGHTS (ART. 12-15) 159 (2) THE RIGHT TO RECTIFICATION (ART. 16) 162 (3) THE RIGHT TO ERASURE (ART. 17) 164 (4) THE RIGHT TO PORTABILITY (ART. 20) 166 4.5.3 PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS 168 5. CONCLUSIONS 168 PART III THE COMPARISON BETWEEN THE GERMAN LEGAL REGIME AND THE GDPR REGARDING MERCHANDISING 171 1. INTRODUCTION 171 2. THE GDPR ' S REGULATION IN MERCHANDISING IN CONTRAST WITH THE GERMAN LEGAL REGIME 172 2.1 PROBLEMS ARISING FROM THE APPLICATION OF THE GDPR IN UNAUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING 172 2.1.1 OVERPROTECTION FOR DATA SUBJECTS? 172 (1) MORE MORAL DAMAGES UNDER THE GDPR? 172 (2) OVERPOWERING DATA SUBJECT ' S RIGHTS? 173 2.1.2 UNDER-PROTECTION FOR PROFESSIONAL MODELS AND CELEBRITIES 174 (1) LACK OF NON-MONETARY REMEDIES IN THE GDPR? 174 (2) INCOMPARABLE MATERIAL DAMAGES UNDER THE GDPR TO GERMAN LAW 175 (3) THE LONG-TERM CONSEQUENCES OF THE RETICENCE 177 2.1.3 INTERIM SUMMARY 179 2.2 PROMINENT CHALLENGES TO MERCHANDISING CONTRACTS IN CONTRAST WITH GERMAN LAW 181 2.2.1 FROM PACTA SUNT SERVANDA TO THE ANYTIME REVOCABILITY 181 2.2.2 STRICTER CONDITIONS FOR VALID CONSENT UNDER THE GDPR 182 10 2.2.3 THE EXCESSIVE BURDEN FOR MERCHANDISERS IMPOSED BY THE DATA SUBJECT ' S RIGHTS 2.2.4 INTERIM CONCLUSION 2.3 INAPPROPRIATE APPLICATION OF THE GDPR IN MERCHANDISING 3. POSSIBLE EXPLANATIONS FOR THE INCOMPATIBILITY 3.1 POSSIBLE REASONS FOR THE HIGH-LEVEL DATA PROTECTION OF THE GDPR 3.1.1 THE APPROACH OF ONE SIZE FITS FOR ALL 3.1.2 REASONS FOR THE RETICENCE TOWARDS THE COMMERCIAL VALUE OF PERSONAL DATA 3.1.3 PROTECTIVE PROVISIONS STEMMING FROM THE DATA PATERNALISM 3.2 UNREASONABLE DIRECT APPLICATION OF THE GDPR IN MERCHANDISING 3.2.1 MERCHANDISING IS FORGOTTEN BY THE GDPR 3.2.2 UNSUITABLE EXPLANATIONS FOR MERCHANDISING 4. CONCLUSIONS PART IV SOLUTIONS TO SETTLE THE INCONSISTENCIES 1. DIRECT APPLICATION OF THE KUG IN MERCHANDISING CASES BASED ON ART. 85 (1) GDPR 1.1 ART. 85 (1) GDPR AS A STAND-ALONE OPENING CLAUSE 1.2 COUNTERARGUMENTS FOR THE INDEPENDENT NATURE OF ART. 85 (1) GDPR 1.3 EVALUATION 2. ART. 6 (1) (F) GDPR AS AN ADDITIONAL LAWFUL GROUND FOR AUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING 2.1 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS PROPOSAL 2.1.1 THE APPLICATION OF ART. 6 (1) (F) GDPR IN A CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP 2.1.2 CONDUCIVE FOR THE BINDINGNESS OF A MERCHANDISING RELATIONSHIP 2.2 LIMITATIONS OF THIS PROPOSAL 2.2.1 LEGAL UNCERTAINTY AND OVERPRESSURE ON THE GENERAL CLAUSE 2.2.2 FUNDAMENTALLY INCOMPATIBLE IN AUTHORIZED MERCHANDISING SCENARIOS 2.2.3 UNABLE TO ADDRESS THE LONG-TERM CONSEQUENCES 184 184 185 186 186 186 188 192 195 195 200 203 206 206 206 209 211 214 214 214 216 217 217 218 219 11 3. RECALIBRATING THE APPLICATION OF ART. 6 (1) (B) GDPR IN THE B2B MERCHANDISING 220 3.1 OTHER POSSIBILITIES OF THE INTERPRETATION OF ART. 6 (1) (B) GDPR 220 3.1.1 THE EDPB ' S GUIDELINES AND SOME SCHOLARS ' PROPOSITION 220 3.1.2 A RELATIVELY LIBERAL READING OF THE AMBIT OF ART. 6 (1) (B) GDPR BY SOME SCHOLARS 222 3.2 THE OBJECTIONS TO THESE INTERPRETATION 223 3.2.1 CRITICISM OF THE EDPB ' S GUIDELINES AND EVALUATION 223 3.2.2 POSSIBLE COUNTERARGUMENTS 225 3.3 APPLYING ART. 6 (1) (B) GDPR TO MERCHANDISING IN THE B2B CONTEXT 229 3.3.1 ARGUMENTS AND ADVANTAGES OF THIS SOLUTION 229 (1) THE LEGAL BASIS FOR THIS SOLUTION 229 (2) THE EDPS ' RESISTANCE TOWARDS MERCHANDISING IN THE B2B CONTEXT? 231 (3) THE ENFORCEMENT OF THIS SOLUTION 232 (4) WELL-BALANCED PROTECTION FOR BOTH SIDES 234 3.3.2 DISADVANTAGES AND OBJECTIONS FOR THIS SOLUTION 236 (1) BORDERLESS APPLICATION OF ART. 6 (1) (B) GDPR IN SUB-LICENSING SITUATIONS 236 (2) UNDER-PROTECTION FOR DATA SUBJECTS IN B2C CONTEXTS 237 (3) ART. 6 (1) (B) GDPR AS A GENERAL CLAUSE FOR FAIR CONTRACTS 238 3.4 SUMMARY 240 4. THE PROPOSAL FOR A TWO-TIER INTERPRETATION OF CONSENT 241 4.1 THE TWO-TIER INTERPRETATION OF CONSENT 241 4.1.1 INTRODUCTION OF THIS SOLUTION 241 (1) THE CONTENT OF THIS PROPOSAL 241 (2) ITS ENFORCEMENT 242 (3) ARGUMENTATION BASED ON THE (INTER-)SYSTEMATIC INTERPRETATION 244 (4) QUESTIONING THE UNLIMITED DATA PATERNALISM IN PRIVATE SECTOR 245 (5) UNIVERSALLY VARIOUS CONNOTATIONS OF CONSENT 247 4.1.2 COUNTERARGUMENTS TO THIS PROPOSAL 249 (1) THE OPINIONS OF AUTHORITIES AS WELL AS THE (INTRA-)SYSTEMATIC INTERPRETATION 249 (2) CHALLENGES TO ITS PRACTICABILITY 252 4.2 CONCLUSIONS 253 12 5. THE COMPARISON OF THE SOLUTIONS AND THE RESULT 254 5.1 UNSUITABLE SOLUTIONS 1 AND 2 254 5.2 THE COMPARISON BETWEEN SOLUTION 3 AND 4 256 5.3 THE RESULT 257 PART V CONCLUSIONS 259 1. THE TRADITIONAL GERMAN APPROACH 259 2. MERCHANDISING UNDER THE GDPR 260 3. DIVERGENCES AND PROBLEMS 262 4. SOLUTIONS 263 BIBLIOGRAPHY 265 13
any_adam_object 1
any_adam_object_boolean 1
author Sun, Jingzhou
author_GND (DE-588)1190240947
author_facet Sun, Jingzhou
author_role aut
author_sort Sun, Jingzhou
author_variant j s js
building Verbundindex
bvnumber BV048505506
classification_rvk PZ 4700
ctrlnum (OCoLC)1346986378
(DE-599)DNB1268464074
discipline Rechtswissenschaft
discipline_str_mv Rechtswissenschaft
edition 1st edition
format Thesis
Book
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02353nam a22005298cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048505506</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230314 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">221011s2022 gw m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="015" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">22,N39</subfield><subfield code="2">dnb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="016" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1268464074</subfield><subfield code="2">DE-101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783756003020</subfield><subfield code="c">Broschur : EUR 79.00 (DE)</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-7560-0302-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3756003027</subfield><subfield code="9">3-7560-0302-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783756003020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1346986378</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DNB1268464074</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">gw</subfield><subfield code="c">XA-DE-BW</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PZ 4700</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)141182:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="2">23sdnb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sun, Jingzhou</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1190240947</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Personality merchandising and the GDPR: an insoluble conflict?</subfield><subfield code="c">Jingzhou Sun</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1st edition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Baden-Baden</subfield><subfield code="b">Nomos</subfield><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Augsburg ; München ; WashingtonDC</subfield><subfield code="b">MIPLC, Munich Intellectual Property Law Center</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">282 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="c">22.7 cm x 15.3 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MIPLC Studies</subfield><subfield code="v">Volume 42</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Dissertation</subfield><subfield code="c">Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München</subfield><subfield code="d">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="t">Datenschutz-Grundverordnung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1105568555</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Merchandising</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4138191-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="t">Datenschutz-Grundverordnung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1105568555</subfield><subfield code="D">u</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Merchandising</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4138191-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)117513-0</subfield><subfield code="4">pbl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-3-7489-3692-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">MIPLC Studies</subfield><subfield code="v">Volume 42</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV035044599</subfield><subfield code="9">42</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">X:MVB</subfield><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="u">http://deposit.dnb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?id=c25e1b4b89e44de4a42b45a16328df0f&amp;prov=M&amp;dok_var=1&amp;dok_ext=htm</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltstext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">DNB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&amp;doc_library=BVB01&amp;local_base=BVB01&amp;doc_number=033882671&amp;sequence=000001&amp;line_number=0001&amp;func_code=DB_RECORDS&amp;service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033882671</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">vlb</subfield><subfield code="d">20220920</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#vlb</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
genre (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content
genre_facet Hochschulschrift
id DE-604.BV048505506
illustrated Not Illustrated
index_date 2024-07-03T20:45:53Z
indexdate 2024-07-10T09:39:58Z
institution BVB
institution_GND (DE-588)117513-0
isbn 9783756003020
3756003027
language English
oai_aleph_id oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033882671
oclc_num 1346986378
open_access_boolean
owner DE-M382
DE-19
DE-BY-UBM
DE-12
DE-384
owner_facet DE-M382
DE-19
DE-BY-UBM
DE-12
DE-384
physical 282 Seiten 22.7 cm x 15.3 cm
publishDate 2022
publishDateSearch 2022
publishDateSort 2022
publisher Nomos
MIPLC, Munich Intellectual Property Law Center
record_format marc
series MIPLC Studies
series2 MIPLC Studies
spelling Sun, Jingzhou Verfasser (DE-588)1190240947 aut
Personality merchandising and the GDPR: an insoluble conflict? Jingzhou Sun
1st edition
Baden-Baden Nomos 2022
Augsburg ; München ; WashingtonDC MIPLC, Munich Intellectual Property Law Center
282 Seiten 22.7 cm x 15.3 cm
txt rdacontent
n rdamedia
nc rdacarrier
MIPLC Studies Volume 42
Dissertation Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München 2022
Europäische Union Datenschutz-Grundverordnung (DE-588)1105568555 gnd rswk-swf
Merchandising (DE-588)4138191-9 gnd rswk-swf
(DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content
Europäische Union Datenschutz-Grundverordnung (DE-588)1105568555 u
Merchandising (DE-588)4138191-9 s
DE-604
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft (DE-588)117513-0 pbl
Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-3-7489-3692-3
MIPLC Studies Volume 42 (DE-604)BV035044599 42
X:MVB text/html http://deposit.dnb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?id=c25e1b4b89e44de4a42b45a16328df0f&prov=M&dok_var=1&dok_ext=htm Inhaltstext
DNB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033882671&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis
1\p vlb 20220920 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#vlb
spellingShingle Sun, Jingzhou
Personality merchandising and the GDPR: an insoluble conflict?
MIPLC Studies
Europäische Union Datenschutz-Grundverordnung (DE-588)1105568555 gnd
Merchandising (DE-588)4138191-9 gnd
subject_GND (DE-588)1105568555
(DE-588)4138191-9
(DE-588)4113937-9
title Personality merchandising and the GDPR: an insoluble conflict?
title_auth Personality merchandising and the GDPR: an insoluble conflict?
title_exact_search Personality merchandising and the GDPR: an insoluble conflict?
title_exact_search_txtP Personality merchandising and the GDPR: an insoluble conflict?
title_full Personality merchandising and the GDPR: an insoluble conflict? Jingzhou Sun
title_fullStr Personality merchandising and the GDPR: an insoluble conflict? Jingzhou Sun
title_full_unstemmed Personality merchandising and the GDPR: an insoluble conflict? Jingzhou Sun
title_short Personality merchandising and the GDPR: an insoluble conflict?
title_sort personality merchandising and the gdpr an insoluble conflict
topic Europäische Union Datenschutz-Grundverordnung (DE-588)1105568555 gnd
Merchandising (DE-588)4138191-9 gnd
topic_facet Europäische Union Datenschutz-Grundverordnung
Merchandising
Hochschulschrift
url http://deposit.dnb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?id=c25e1b4b89e44de4a42b45a16328df0f&prov=M&dok_var=1&dok_ext=htm
http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033882671&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
volume_link (DE-604)BV035044599
work_keys_str_mv AT sunjingzhou personalitymerchandisingandthegdpraninsolubleconflict
AT nomosverlagsgesellschaft personalitymerchandisingandthegdpraninsolubleconflict