Sovereignty sharing in fragile states
"This book addresses a prime challenge facing the international community: how to address governance gaps in fragile states. When governments fail to provide law and order and other basic public services, their citizens suffer, and threats to international security can emerge. Ordinary foreign...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Stanford, California
Stanford University Press
[2021]
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048476183 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20230109 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 220919s2021 b||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781503613669 |c hbk. |9 978-1-5036-1366-9 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1351786319 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048476183 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Ciorciari, John D. |d 1974- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1053040709 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Sovereignty sharing in fragile states |c John D. Ciorciari |
| 264 | 1 | |a Stanford, California |b Stanford University Press |c [2021] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2021 | |
| 300 | |a viii, 314 Seiten |c 24 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a Justifying shared sovereignty -- How political foundations affect performance -- Partnering to prosecute war crimes -- Compromising on hybrid justice -- Imposing a mixed tribunal -- Sharing sovereignty in the streets -- Contracting for criminal investigation -- Co-signing to curb corruption -- The path ahead | |
| 520 | 3 | |a "This book addresses a prime challenge facing the international community: how to address governance gaps in fragile states. When governments fail to provide law and order and other basic public services, their citizens suffer, and threats to international security can emerge. Ordinary foreign aid programs are often insufficient remedies. A remarkable alternative therefore has arisen in which international and national actors share authority to carry out core sovereign tasks. This type of "sovereignty sharing" is controversial and challenging but is an important way in which the United Nations and other key global actors have sought to bolster governance in troubled polities. I examine sovereignty-sharing arrangements designed to repair ruptures in the rule of law-the heart of a well-governed state. I discuss both the conditions under which sovereignty may be justified and the conditions under which joint ventures are likely to be effective in meeting their aims. | |
| 520 | 3 | |a A central argument in the book is that these two questions are closely related, because the perceived legitimacy of a sovereignty-sharing venture hinges primarily on its performance. Sovereignty sharing carries important positive potential as a way to provide stopgap governance services and to help strengthen and reform ailing local institutions. It can pair international resources and expertise with local knowledge and ownership. Thriving partnerships can deliver better public services, earn popular legitimacy, and foster capacity building and domestic institutional reform. However, the dangers of sovereignty-sharing arrangements are equally apparent. This book illuminates the political factors that shape the creation, design, and implementation of sovereignty-sharing arrangements-and thus their performance and perceived legitimacy--above all on how the convergence or divergence of national and international interests shape these exceptional ventures. | |
| 520 | 3 | |a Sovereignty sharing is usually based on precarious political foundations, as the partners seldom share a common vision for governance. To accommodate differences, sovereignty-sharing arrangements are usually rooted in ambiguous agreements that contribute to confusion and discord during implementation. In particular, the partners' interests tend to diverge on matters of domestic institutional reform. As a result, while sovereignty-sharing schemes often have made important contributions through stopgap service provision, their record is much weaker on embedding reform. This book illustrates these arguments by examining sovereignty-sharing arrangements in three key domains: hybrid criminal tribunals, joint policing arrangements, and anti-corruption initiatives. Within each area, I touch on the universe of relevant cases and discuss the most important ventures in depth. These include cases from Sierra Leone, Cambodia, Lebanon, Timor-Leste, Guatemala, and Liberia. | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Politische Stabilität |0 (DE-588)4128497-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Begrenzte Staatlichkeit |0 (DE-588)107904809X |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Souveränität |0 (DE-588)4132367-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Legitimität |0 (DE-588)4035043-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 653 | 0 | |a Sovereignty | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Rule of law | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Legitimacy of governments | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Political stability | |
| 653 | 0 | |a International cooperation | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Souveraineté | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Règle de droit | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Légitimité des gouvernements | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Stabilité politique | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Coopération internationale | |
| 653 | 0 | |a sovereignty | |
| 653 | 0 | |a International cooperation | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Legitimacy of governments | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Political stability | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Rule of law | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Sovereignty | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Sovereignty | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Rule of law | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Legitimacy of governments | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Political stability | |
| 653 | 0 | |a International cooperation | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Begrenzte Staatlichkeit |0 (DE-588)107904809X |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Legitimität |0 (DE-588)4035043-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Souveränität |0 (DE-588)4132367-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Politische Stabilität |0 (DE-588)4128497-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-1-5036-1428-4 |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033853920 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184427863998464 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Ciorciari, John D. 1974- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1053040709 |
| author_facet | Ciorciari, John D. 1974- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Ciorciari, John D. 1974- |
| author_variant | j d c jd jdc |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048476183 |
| contents | Justifying shared sovereignty -- How political foundations affect performance -- Partnering to prosecute war crimes -- Compromising on hybrid justice -- Imposing a mixed tribunal -- Sharing sovereignty in the streets -- Contracting for criminal investigation -- Co-signing to curb corruption -- The path ahead |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1351786319 (DE-599)BVBBV048476183 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05438nam a2200685 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048476183</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230109 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220919s2021 b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781503613669</subfield><subfield code="c">hbk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-5036-1366-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1351786319</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048476183</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ciorciari, John D.</subfield><subfield code="d">1974-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1053040709</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sovereignty sharing in fragile states</subfield><subfield code="c">John D. Ciorciari</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Stanford, California</subfield><subfield code="b">Stanford University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2021]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">viii, 314 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="c">24 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Justifying shared sovereignty -- How political foundations affect performance -- Partnering to prosecute war crimes -- Compromising on hybrid justice -- Imposing a mixed tribunal -- Sharing sovereignty in the streets -- Contracting for criminal investigation -- Co-signing to curb corruption -- The path ahead</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"This book addresses a prime challenge facing the international community: how to address governance gaps in fragile states. When governments fail to provide law and order and other basic public services, their citizens suffer, and threats to international security can emerge. Ordinary foreign aid programs are often insufficient remedies. A remarkable alternative therefore has arisen in which international and national actors share authority to carry out core sovereign tasks. This type of "sovereignty sharing" is controversial and challenging but is an important way in which the United Nations and other key global actors have sought to bolster governance in troubled polities. I examine sovereignty-sharing arrangements designed to repair ruptures in the rule of law-the heart of a well-governed state. I discuss both the conditions under which sovereignty may be justified and the conditions under which joint ventures are likely to be effective in meeting their aims. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A central argument in the book is that these two questions are closely related, because the perceived legitimacy of a sovereignty-sharing venture hinges primarily on its performance. Sovereignty sharing carries important positive potential as a way to provide stopgap governance services and to help strengthen and reform ailing local institutions. It can pair international resources and expertise with local knowledge and ownership. Thriving partnerships can deliver better public services, earn popular legitimacy, and foster capacity building and domestic institutional reform. However, the dangers of sovereignty-sharing arrangements are equally apparent. This book illuminates the political factors that shape the creation, design, and implementation of sovereignty-sharing arrangements-and thus their performance and perceived legitimacy--above all on how the convergence or divergence of national and international interests shape these exceptional ventures. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sovereignty sharing is usually based on precarious political foundations, as the partners seldom share a common vision for governance. To accommodate differences, sovereignty-sharing arrangements are usually rooted in ambiguous agreements that contribute to confusion and discord during implementation. In particular, the partners' interests tend to diverge on matters of domestic institutional reform. As a result, while sovereignty-sharing schemes often have made important contributions through stopgap service provision, their record is much weaker on embedding reform. This book illustrates these arguments by examining sovereignty-sharing arrangements in three key domains: hybrid criminal tribunals, joint policing arrangements, and anti-corruption initiatives. Within each area, I touch on the universe of relevant cases and discuss the most important ventures in depth. These include cases from Sierra Leone, Cambodia, Lebanon, Timor-Leste, Guatemala, and Liberia. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Politische Stabilität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4128497-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Begrenzte Staatlichkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)107904809X</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Souveränität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4132367-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Legitimität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4035043-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sovereignty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rule of law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Legitimacy of governments</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political stability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International cooperation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Souveraineté</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Règle de droit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Légitimité des gouvernements</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Stabilité politique</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Coopération internationale</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">sovereignty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International cooperation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Legitimacy of governments</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political stability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rule of law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sovereignty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sovereignty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rule of law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Legitimacy of governments</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political stability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International cooperation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Begrenzte Staatlichkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)107904809X</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Legitimität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4035043-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Souveränität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4132367-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Politische Stabilität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4128497-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-5036-1428-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033853920</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048476183 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T20:37:54Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:39:10Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781503613669 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033853920 |
| oclc_num | 1351786319 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | viii, 314 Seiten 24 cm |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateSearch | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | Stanford University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Ciorciari, John D. 1974- Verfasser (DE-588)1053040709 aut Sovereignty sharing in fragile states John D. Ciorciari Stanford, California Stanford University Press [2021] © 2021 viii, 314 Seiten 24 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Justifying shared sovereignty -- How political foundations affect performance -- Partnering to prosecute war crimes -- Compromising on hybrid justice -- Imposing a mixed tribunal -- Sharing sovereignty in the streets -- Contracting for criminal investigation -- Co-signing to curb corruption -- The path ahead "This book addresses a prime challenge facing the international community: how to address governance gaps in fragile states. When governments fail to provide law and order and other basic public services, their citizens suffer, and threats to international security can emerge. Ordinary foreign aid programs are often insufficient remedies. A remarkable alternative therefore has arisen in which international and national actors share authority to carry out core sovereign tasks. This type of "sovereignty sharing" is controversial and challenging but is an important way in which the United Nations and other key global actors have sought to bolster governance in troubled polities. I examine sovereignty-sharing arrangements designed to repair ruptures in the rule of law-the heart of a well-governed state. I discuss both the conditions under which sovereignty may be justified and the conditions under which joint ventures are likely to be effective in meeting their aims. A central argument in the book is that these two questions are closely related, because the perceived legitimacy of a sovereignty-sharing venture hinges primarily on its performance. Sovereignty sharing carries important positive potential as a way to provide stopgap governance services and to help strengthen and reform ailing local institutions. It can pair international resources and expertise with local knowledge and ownership. Thriving partnerships can deliver better public services, earn popular legitimacy, and foster capacity building and domestic institutional reform. However, the dangers of sovereignty-sharing arrangements are equally apparent. This book illuminates the political factors that shape the creation, design, and implementation of sovereignty-sharing arrangements-and thus their performance and perceived legitimacy--above all on how the convergence or divergence of national and international interests shape these exceptional ventures. Sovereignty sharing is usually based on precarious political foundations, as the partners seldom share a common vision for governance. To accommodate differences, sovereignty-sharing arrangements are usually rooted in ambiguous agreements that contribute to confusion and discord during implementation. In particular, the partners' interests tend to diverge on matters of domestic institutional reform. As a result, while sovereignty-sharing schemes often have made important contributions through stopgap service provision, their record is much weaker on embedding reform. This book illustrates these arguments by examining sovereignty-sharing arrangements in three key domains: hybrid criminal tribunals, joint policing arrangements, and anti-corruption initiatives. Within each area, I touch on the universe of relevant cases and discuss the most important ventures in depth. These include cases from Sierra Leone, Cambodia, Lebanon, Timor-Leste, Guatemala, and Liberia. Politische Stabilität (DE-588)4128497-5 gnd rswk-swf Begrenzte Staatlichkeit (DE-588)107904809X gnd rswk-swf Souveränität (DE-588)4132367-1 gnd rswk-swf Legitimität (DE-588)4035043-5 gnd rswk-swf Sovereignty Rule of law Legitimacy of governments Political stability International cooperation Souveraineté Règle de droit Légitimité des gouvernements Stabilité politique Coopération internationale sovereignty Begrenzte Staatlichkeit (DE-588)107904809X s Legitimität (DE-588)4035043-5 s Souveränität (DE-588)4132367-1 s Politische Stabilität (DE-588)4128497-5 s DE-604 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-1-5036-1428-4 |
| spellingShingle | Ciorciari, John D. 1974- Sovereignty sharing in fragile states Justifying shared sovereignty -- How political foundations affect performance -- Partnering to prosecute war crimes -- Compromising on hybrid justice -- Imposing a mixed tribunal -- Sharing sovereignty in the streets -- Contracting for criminal investigation -- Co-signing to curb corruption -- The path ahead Politische Stabilität (DE-588)4128497-5 gnd Begrenzte Staatlichkeit (DE-588)107904809X gnd Souveränität (DE-588)4132367-1 gnd Legitimität (DE-588)4035043-5 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4128497-5 (DE-588)107904809X (DE-588)4132367-1 (DE-588)4035043-5 |
| title | Sovereignty sharing in fragile states |
| title_auth | Sovereignty sharing in fragile states |
| title_exact_search | Sovereignty sharing in fragile states |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Sovereignty sharing in fragile states |
| title_full | Sovereignty sharing in fragile states John D. Ciorciari |
| title_fullStr | Sovereignty sharing in fragile states John D. Ciorciari |
| title_full_unstemmed | Sovereignty sharing in fragile states John D. Ciorciari |
| title_short | Sovereignty sharing in fragile states |
| title_sort | sovereignty sharing in fragile states |
| topic | Politische Stabilität (DE-588)4128497-5 gnd Begrenzte Staatlichkeit (DE-588)107904809X gnd Souveränität (DE-588)4132367-1 gnd Legitimität (DE-588)4035043-5 gnd |
| topic_facet | Politische Stabilität Begrenzte Staatlichkeit Souveränität Legitimität |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ciorciarijohnd sovereigntysharinginfragilestates |