Critical race judgments re-written U.S. court opinions on race and the law
By re-writing US Supreme Court opinions that implicate critical dimensions of racial justice, Critical Race Judgments demonstrates that it's possible to be judge and a critical race theorist. Specific issues covered in these cases include the death penalty, employment, voting, policing, educati...
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere Verfasser: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 UBG01 UPA01 URL des Erstveröffentlichers |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Zusammenfassung: | By re-writing US Supreme Court opinions that implicate critical dimensions of racial justice, Critical Race Judgments demonstrates that it's possible to be judge and a critical race theorist. Specific issues covered in these cases include the death penalty, employment, voting, policing, education, the environment, justice, housing, immigration, sexual orientation, segregation, and mass incarceration. While some rewritten cases - Plessy v. Ferguson (which constitutionalized Jim Crow) and Korematsu v. United States (which constitutionalized internment) - originally focused on race, many of the rewritten opinions - Lawrence v. Texas (which constitutionalized sodomy laws) and Roe v. Wade (which constitutionalized a woman's right to choose) - are used to incorporate racial justice principles in novel and important ways. This work is essential for everyone who needs to understand why critical race theory must be deployed in constitutional law to uphold and advance racial justice principles that are foundational to US democracy |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 07 Apr 2022) Arizona v. United States / Kevin Johnson, Chae Chan -- Ping v. United States / Rose Cuizon Villazor -- Plessy v. Ferguson / Trina Jones -- Korematsu v. United States / Robert Chang -- The Slaughter-House Cases / Francisco Valdez -- Terry v. Ohio / Paul Butler -- Rogers v. American Airlines / Wendy Greene -- Shaw v. Reno / Guy Charles &has Luis Fuentes-Rohwer -- Rice v. Cayetano / Addie Rolnick -- Milliken v. Bradley / Michelle Adams -- Gong Lum v. Rice / Reginald Oh -- Regents of the University of California v. Bakke / Luke Charles Harris -- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 / Charles Lawrence -- Meritor Savings Bank FSB v. Vinson / Angela Onwuachi-Willig -- Dred Scott v. Sandford / Cheryl Harris -- Virginia v. Black / Mari Matsuda -- Palmer v. Thompson / Elise Boddie -- Griggs v. Duke Power Co. / Angela Onwuachi-Willig and David Simson -- Washington v. Davis / Kimberle Crewnshaw -- Katz v. United States / Bennett Capers -- Illinois v. Wardlow / L. Song Richardson -- Loving v. Virginia / Peggy Cooper Davis -- Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl / Matthew Fletcher -- Reno v. Flores / Jennifer Chacon -- Lawrence v. Texas / Russell Robinson -- Moore v. City of East Cleveland / Robin Lenhardt -- Buck v. Bell / Dorothy Roberts -- Roe v. Wade / Melissa Murray -- United States v. Cruikshank / Pratheepan Gulasekaram -- McCleskey v. Kemp / Mario Barnes -- Whren v. United States / Devon Carbado and Jonathan Feingold -- Richardson v. Ramirez / Janai Nelson -- Bean v. Southwestern Waste Management Corp. / Sheila Foster -- Barlow v. Collins / Angela P. Harris -- Muller v. Oregon / Khiara Bridges -- Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co. / Emily Hough -- San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez / Rachel Moran |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (xxix, 694 Seiten) |
| ISBN: | 9781316691090 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/9781316691090 |