The Revival of the "Cash versus Food" Debate New Evidence for an Old Quandary?
The longstanding "cash versus food" debate has received renewed attention in both research and practice. This paper reviews key issues shaping the debate and presents new evidence from randomized and quasi-experimental evaluations that deliberately compare cash and in-kind food transfers i...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Washington, D.C
The World Bank
2016
|
| Schriftenreihe: | World Bank E-Library Archive
|
| Online-Zugang: | kostenfrei |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048269284 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2016 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1596/1813-9450-7584 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-1-WBA)NLM010465472 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334018420 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVNLM010465472 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-521 |a DE-573 |a DE-523 |a DE-Re13 |a DE-19 |a DE-355 |a DE-703 |a DE-91 |a DE-706 |a DE-29 |a DE-M347 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-20 |a DE-739 |a DE-1043 |a DE-863 |a DE-862 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gentilini, Ugo |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The Revival of the "Cash versus Food" Debate |b New Evidence for an Old Quandary? |c Ugo Gentilini |
| 264 | 1 | |a Washington, D.C |b The World Bank |c 2016 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (31 p) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a World Bank E-Library Archive | |
| 520 | |a The longstanding "cash versus food" debate has received renewed attention in both research and practice. This paper reviews key issues shaping the debate and presents new evidence from randomized and quasi-experimental evaluations that deliberately compare cash and in-kind food transfers in ten developing counties. Findings show that relative effectiveness cannot be generalized: although some differences emerge in terms of food consumption and dietary diversity, average impacts tend to depend on context, specific objectives, and their measurement. Costs for cash transfers and vouchers tend to be significantly lower relative to in-kind food. Yet the consistency and robustness of methods for efficiency analyses varies greatly | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Gentilini, Ugo |4 oth | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Gentilini, Ugo |t The Revival of the "Cash versus Food" Debate : New Evidence for an Old Quandary? |d Washington, D.C : The World Bank, 2016 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7584 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-1-WBA | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033649479 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| DE-BY-UBG_katkey | 197286794 |
|---|---|
| DE-BY-UBM_katkey | 6675199 |
| _version_ | 1824050514679037952 |
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Gentilini, Ugo |
| author_facet | Gentilini, Ugo |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Gentilini, Ugo |
| author_variant | u g ug |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048269284 |
| collection | ZDB-1-WBA |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-1-WBA)NLM010465472 (OCoLC)1334018420 (DE-599)GBVNLM010465472 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1596/1813-9450-7584 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02086nam a2200337zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048269284</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2016 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1596/1813-9450-7584</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-1-WBA)NLM010465472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334018420</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVNLM010465472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-523</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Re13</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-706</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M347</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-862</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gentilini, Ugo</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The Revival of the "Cash versus Food" Debate</subfield><subfield code="b">New Evidence for an Old Quandary?</subfield><subfield code="c">Ugo Gentilini</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Washington, D.C</subfield><subfield code="b">The World Bank</subfield><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (31 p)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">World Bank E-Library Archive</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The longstanding "cash versus food" debate has received renewed attention in both research and practice. This paper reviews key issues shaping the debate and presents new evidence from randomized and quasi-experimental evaluations that deliberately compare cash and in-kind food transfers in ten developing counties. Findings show that relative effectiveness cannot be generalized: although some differences emerge in terms of food consumption and dietary diversity, average impacts tend to depend on context, specific objectives, and their measurement. Costs for cash transfers and vouchers tend to be significantly lower relative to in-kind food. Yet the consistency and robustness of methods for efficiency analyses varies greatly</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gentilini, Ugo</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Gentilini, Ugo</subfield><subfield code="t">The Revival of the "Cash versus Food" Debate : New Evidence for an Old Quandary?</subfield><subfield code="d">Washington, D.C : The World Bank, 2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7584</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-WBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033649479</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048269284 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2025-02-14T17:17:08Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033649479 |
| oclc_num | 1334018420 |
| open_access_boolean | 1 |
| owner | DE-12 DE-521 DE-573 DE-523 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-703 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-706 DE-29 DE-M347 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-20 DE-739 DE-1043 DE-863 DE-BY-FWS DE-862 DE-BY-FWS |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-521 DE-573 DE-523 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-703 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-706 DE-29 DE-M347 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-20 DE-739 DE-1043 DE-863 DE-BY-FWS DE-862 DE-BY-FWS |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (31 p) |
| psigel | ZDB-1-WBA |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publishDateSearch | 2016 |
| publishDateSort | 2016 |
| publisher | The World Bank |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | World Bank E-Library Archive |
| spellingShingle | Gentilini, Ugo The Revival of the "Cash versus Food" Debate New Evidence for an Old Quandary? |
| title | The Revival of the "Cash versus Food" Debate New Evidence for an Old Quandary? |
| title_auth | The Revival of the "Cash versus Food" Debate New Evidence for an Old Quandary? |
| title_exact_search | The Revival of the "Cash versus Food" Debate New Evidence for an Old Quandary? |
| title_full | The Revival of the "Cash versus Food" Debate New Evidence for an Old Quandary? Ugo Gentilini |
| title_fullStr | The Revival of the "Cash versus Food" Debate New Evidence for an Old Quandary? Ugo Gentilini |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Revival of the "Cash versus Food" Debate New Evidence for an Old Quandary? Ugo Gentilini |
| title_short | The Revival of the "Cash versus Food" Debate |
| title_sort | the revival of the cash versus food debate new evidence for an old quandary |
| title_sub | New Evidence for an Old Quandary? |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7584 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gentiliniugo therevivalofthecashversusfooddebatenewevidenceforanoldquandary |