Ustavnost člana 395 Zakona o parničnom postupku Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | Bosnian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2018
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | DE-12 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048262203 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2018 xx o|||| 00||| bos d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol745459 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334037890 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048262203 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a bos | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Išerić, Harun |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ustavnost člana 395 Zakona o parničnom postupku Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine |c Harun Išerić |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2018 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2018 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 24) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Paper discusses constitutionality of the article 395 of the Law on Civil Procedure of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina which proscribes that provisions on expenses shall apply to the parties represented by the Public Attorney's Office. In such cases, the costs of the litigation shall include the amount that could be granted to the party as the remuneration for attorney. First part of the paper is devoted to the comparative solutions on this issue in Croatia, Serbia and Montenegro. Special attention is paid to the decision of constitutional courts on constitutionality of similar legal provisions in these countries. In second part of the paper it is discussed whether similarity and differences between lawyers and public attorneys provide arguments for constitutionality of such legal provision. Third part is dedicated to the compatibility of disputed provision with human rights, more precisely with right of access to the court and right to the property. That is done through four questions test: whether there is interference with these rights; was the interference conducted in accordance with the law; does the interference further a legitimate aim; is the interference necessary in a democratic society. It is concluded that there are more arguments in favour of the constitutionality of the article 395. In second hand, absence of the protective measures which could provide court with the discretion to exempt parties from paying remuneration to the public attorney could be potential argument of its unconstitutionality | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Civil Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Human Rights and Humanitarian Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Law | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642406 | |
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=745459 |l DE-12 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1819313139019153409 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Išerić, Harun |
| author_facet | Išerić, Harun |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Išerić, Harun |
| author_variant | h i hi |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048262203 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol745459 (OCoLC)1334037890 (DE-599)BVBBV048262203 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02820nam a2200397zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048262203</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2018 xx o|||| 00||| bos d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol745459</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334037890</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048262203</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">bos</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Išerić, Harun</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ustavnost člana 395 Zakona o parničnom postupku Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine</subfield><subfield code="c">Harun Išerić</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 24)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Paper discusses constitutionality of the article 395 of the Law on Civil Procedure of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina which proscribes that provisions on expenses shall apply to the parties represented by the Public Attorney's Office. In such cases, the costs of the litigation shall include the amount that could be granted to the party as the remuneration for attorney. First part of the paper is devoted to the comparative solutions on this issue in Croatia, Serbia and Montenegro. Special attention is paid to the decision of constitutional courts on constitutionality of similar legal provisions in these countries. In second part of the paper it is discussed whether similarity and differences between lawyers and public attorneys provide arguments for constitutionality of such legal provision. Third part is dedicated to the compatibility of disputed provision with human rights, more precisely with right of access to the court and right to the property. That is done through four questions test: whether there is interference with these rights; was the interference conducted in accordance with the law; does the interference further a legitimate aim; is the interference necessary in a democratic society. It is concluded that there are more arguments in favour of the constitutionality of the article 395. In second hand, absence of the protective measures which could provide court with the discretion to exempt parties from paying remuneration to the public attorney could be potential argument of its unconstitutionality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Civil Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Human Rights and Humanitarian Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642406</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=745459</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048262203 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-24T09:23:33Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | Bosnian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033642406 |
| oclc_num | 1334037890 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 24) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Išerić, Harun Verfasser aut Ustavnost člana 395 Zakona o parničnom postupku Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine Harun Išerić Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2018 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2018 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 24) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Paper discusses constitutionality of the article 395 of the Law on Civil Procedure of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina which proscribes that provisions on expenses shall apply to the parties represented by the Public Attorney's Office. In such cases, the costs of the litigation shall include the amount that could be granted to the party as the remuneration for attorney. First part of the paper is devoted to the comparative solutions on this issue in Croatia, Serbia and Montenegro. Special attention is paid to the decision of constitutional courts on constitutionality of similar legal provisions in these countries. In second part of the paper it is discussed whether similarity and differences between lawyers and public attorneys provide arguments for constitutionality of such legal provision. Third part is dedicated to the compatibility of disputed provision with human rights, more precisely with right of access to the court and right to the property. That is done through four questions test: whether there is interference with these rights; was the interference conducted in accordance with the law; does the interference further a legitimate aim; is the interference necessary in a democratic society. It is concluded that there are more arguments in favour of the constitutionality of the article 395. In second hand, absence of the protective measures which could provide court with the discretion to exempt parties from paying remuneration to the public attorney could be potential argument of its unconstitutionality Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Civil Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Public Law |
| spellingShingle | Išerić, Harun Ustavnost člana 395 Zakona o parničnom postupku Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Civil Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Public Law |
| title | Ustavnost člana 395 Zakona o parničnom postupku Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine |
| title_auth | Ustavnost člana 395 Zakona o parničnom postupku Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine |
| title_exact_search | Ustavnost člana 395 Zakona o parničnom postupku Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine |
| title_full | Ustavnost člana 395 Zakona o parničnom postupku Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine Harun Išerić |
| title_fullStr | Ustavnost člana 395 Zakona o parničnom postupku Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine Harun Išerić |
| title_full_unstemmed | Ustavnost člana 395 Zakona o parničnom postupku Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine Harun Išerić |
| title_short | Ustavnost člana 395 Zakona o parničnom postupku Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine |
| title_sort | ustavnost clana 395 zakona o parnicnom postupku federacije bosne i hercegovine |
| topic | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Civil Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Public Law |
| topic_facet | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Civil Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Public Law |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT isericharun ustavnostclana395zakonaoparnicnompostupkufederacijebosneihercegovine |