Neposredno učešće građana u postupku promene ustava

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Nastić, Maja (VerfasserIn)
Format: Elektronisch E-Book
Veröffentlicht: Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2017
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:DE-12
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a2200000zc 4500
001 BV048261207
003 DE-604
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|uuu---uuuuu
008 220609s2017 xx o|||| 00||| srp d
035 |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol570629 
035 |a (OCoLC)1334053212 
035 |a (DE-599)BVBBV048261207 
040 |a DE-604  |b ger  |e aacr 
041 0 |a srp 
049 |a DE-12 
084 |a OST  |q DE-12  |2 fid 
100 1 |a Nastić, Maja  |e Verfasser  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Neposredno učešće građana u postupku promene ustava  |c Maja Nastić 
264 1 |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]  |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo  |c 2017 
264 2 |a Frankfurt M.  |b CEEOL  |c 2017 
300 |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 14) 
336 |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Bearing in mind the announced changes of the Constitution of Serbia, the focal point of this paper is the role of the citizens in this process, namely the possibilities and legal instruments that are available to citizens in the amending process. The Constitution of Serbia (2006) emphasizes at the outset the role of the citizens. Sovereignity is vested in citizens who exercise it through referendums, people's initiative and freely elected representatives. (art. 2). People's initiative authorizes the certain part of electorate to initiate the procedure for amending the Constitution. The initiative for amending the Constitution of Serbia may be submitted by at least 150,000 voters. This makes the role of citizens more difficult than it was in the previuos Constitution (1990). When we have in mind the relevant provisions contained in law, the realization of this right is additionally hampered by short deadlines and additional obligations of initiators.  
500 |a The role of the citizens in the process of amending constitution is more prominent when it comes to the referendum. The Constitution of Serbia recognizes mandatory and optional referendum. Although the Constitution narrows the possibilities for issuing a compulsory referendum, it is required for all the most important issues. But, the most important novelty that the Constitution brings about is the adoption of a decision. The amendment to the Constitution shall be adopted if the majority of voters who participated in the referendum voted in favor of the amendment. In this way, it is much easier to amend the Constituton than it used to be. In the upcoming referendum, it is very important to adhere the Recommendation made by Venice Commission in order to achieve the real will of citizens and not to manifest the manipulative potential of the referendum.  
500 |a We can conclude that direct participation in amending the Constitution is much more difficult in the existing Constitution, than it used to be. The Constitution (2006) significally raised the therehold for submitting people's initiative and it could be amended (in some specific parts) only by voting in the National Assembly. These solutions have weakened the position of citizens in terms of thier direct participion in the amending Constitution 
650 4 |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence 
650 4 |a Constitutional Law 
650 4 |a Civil Society 
650 4 |a Public Law 
912 |a ZDB-45-CGR 
940 1 |n oe 
940 1 |q BSB_OE_CEEOL 
943 1 |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641410 
966 e |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=570629  |l DE-12  |p ZDB-45-CGR  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 

Datensatz im Suchindex

_version_ 1819313137160028160
any_adam_object
author Nastić, Maja
author_facet Nastić, Maja
author_role aut
author_sort Nastić, Maja
author_variant m n mn
building Verbundindex
bvnumber BV048261207
collection ZDB-45-CGR
ctrlnum (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol570629
(OCoLC)1334053212
(DE-599)BVBBV048261207
format Electronic
eBook
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03509nam a2200409zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048261207</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2017 xx o|||| 00||| srp d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol570629</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334053212</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048261207</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nastić, Maja</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Neposredno učešće građana u postupku promene ustava</subfield><subfield code="c">Maja Nastić</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 14)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bearing in mind the announced changes of the Constitution of Serbia, the focal point of this paper is the role of the citizens in this process, namely the possibilities and legal instruments that are available to citizens in the amending process. The Constitution of Serbia (2006) emphasizes at the outset the role of the citizens. Sovereignity is vested in citizens who exercise it through referendums, people's initiative and freely elected representatives. (art. 2). People's initiative authorizes the certain part of electorate to initiate the procedure for amending the Constitution. The initiative for amending the Constitution of Serbia may be submitted by at least 150,000 voters. This makes the role of citizens more difficult than it was in the previuos Constitution (1990). When we have in mind the relevant provisions contained in law, the realization of this right is additionally hampered by short deadlines and additional obligations of initiators. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The role of the citizens in the process of amending constitution is more prominent when it comes to the referendum. The Constitution of Serbia recognizes mandatory and optional referendum. Although the Constitution narrows the possibilities for issuing a compulsory referendum, it is required for all the most important issues. But, the most important novelty that the Constitution brings about is the adoption of a decision. The amendment to the Constitution shall be adopted if the majority of voters who participated in the referendum voted in favor of the amendment. In this way, it is much easier to amend the Constituton than it used to be. In the upcoming referendum, it is very important to adhere the Recommendation made by Venice Commission in order to achieve the real will of citizens and not to manifest the manipulative potential of the referendum. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">We can conclude that direct participation in amending the Constitution is much more difficult in the existing Constitution, than it used to be. The Constitution (2006) significally raised the therehold for submitting people's initiative and it could be amended (in some specific parts) only by voting in the National Assembly. These solutions have weakened the position of citizens in terms of thier direct participion in the amending Constitution</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Civil Society</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641410</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=570629</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
id DE-604.BV048261207
illustrated Not Illustrated
indexdate 2024-12-24T09:23:31Z
institution BVB
oai_aleph_id oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641410
oclc_num 1334053212
open_access_boolean
owner DE-12
owner_facet DE-12
physical 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 14)
psigel ZDB-45-CGR
BSB_OE_CEEOL
publishDate 2017
publishDateSearch 2017
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
record_format marc
spelling Nastić, Maja Verfasser aut
Neposredno učešće građana u postupku promene ustava Maja Nastić
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2017
Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2017
1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 14)
txt rdacontent
c rdamedia
cr rdacarrier
Bearing in mind the announced changes of the Constitution of Serbia, the focal point of this paper is the role of the citizens in this process, namely the possibilities and legal instruments that are available to citizens in the amending process. The Constitution of Serbia (2006) emphasizes at the outset the role of the citizens. Sovereignity is vested in citizens who exercise it through referendums, people's initiative and freely elected representatives. (art. 2). People's initiative authorizes the certain part of electorate to initiate the procedure for amending the Constitution. The initiative for amending the Constitution of Serbia may be submitted by at least 150,000 voters. This makes the role of citizens more difficult than it was in the previuos Constitution (1990). When we have in mind the relevant provisions contained in law, the realization of this right is additionally hampered by short deadlines and additional obligations of initiators.
The role of the citizens in the process of amending constitution is more prominent when it comes to the referendum. The Constitution of Serbia recognizes mandatory and optional referendum. Although the Constitution narrows the possibilities for issuing a compulsory referendum, it is required for all the most important issues. But, the most important novelty that the Constitution brings about is the adoption of a decision. The amendment to the Constitution shall be adopted if the majority of voters who participated in the referendum voted in favor of the amendment. In this way, it is much easier to amend the Constituton than it used to be. In the upcoming referendum, it is very important to adhere the Recommendation made by Venice Commission in order to achieve the real will of citizens and not to manifest the manipulative potential of the referendum.
We can conclude that direct participation in amending the Constitution is much more difficult in the existing Constitution, than it used to be. The Constitution (2006) significally raised the therehold for submitting people's initiative and it could be amended (in some specific parts) only by voting in the National Assembly. These solutions have weakened the position of citizens in terms of thier direct participion in the amending Constitution
Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence
Constitutional Law
Civil Society
Public Law
spellingShingle Nastić, Maja
Neposredno učešće građana u postupku promene ustava
Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence
Constitutional Law
Civil Society
Public Law
title Neposredno učešće građana u postupku promene ustava
title_auth Neposredno učešće građana u postupku promene ustava
title_exact_search Neposredno učešće građana u postupku promene ustava
title_full Neposredno učešće građana u postupku promene ustava Maja Nastić
title_fullStr Neposredno učešće građana u postupku promene ustava Maja Nastić
title_full_unstemmed Neposredno učešće građana u postupku promene ustava Maja Nastić
title_short Neposredno učešće građana u postupku promene ustava
title_sort neposredno ucesce gradana u postupku promene ustava
topic Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence
Constitutional Law
Civil Society
Public Law
topic_facet Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence
Constitutional Law
Civil Society
Public Law
work_keys_str_mv AT nasticmaja neposrednoucescegrađanaupostupkupromeneustava