Mens rea in EU antitrust law when intentions matter
The maxim actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea expresses the idea that someone who committed an act prohibited by the criminal law can generally only be punished if he or she did so with a specific state of mind. The most serious offences are normally considered those that involve an intention to...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands
Wolters Kluwer
[2020]
|
| Schriftenreihe: | International competition law series
85 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048239166 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20230206 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 220523s2020 xx b||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789403523538 |9 978-94-035-2353-8 | ||
| 020 | |a 9403523530 |9 94-035-2353-0 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048239166 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-M382 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Blockx, Jan |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1216437165 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Mens rea in EU antitrust law |b when intentions matter |c Jan Blockx |
| 246 | 1 | 3 | |a Mens rea in European Union antitrust law |
| 264 | 1 | |a Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands |b Wolters Kluwer |c [2020] | |
| 300 | |a xi, 251 Seiten |c 25 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a International competition law series |v 85 | |
| 505 | 8 | 0 | |t The concept of mens rea -- |t Mens rea in Article 101 TFEU -- |t Mens rea in Article 102 TFEU -- |t Mens rea in the enforcement of the antitrust rules -- |t Evaluation of the role of mens rea in EU antitrust law |
| 520 | 3 | |a The maxim actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea expresses the idea that someone who committed an act prohibited by the criminal law can generally only be punished if he or she did so with a specific state of mind. The most serious offences are normally considered those that involve an intention to conduct oneself unlawfully or to cause an unlawful result. Usually the knowledge of the material elements of the offence is equated with intention. Even for strict liability and negligent offences, the perpetrator's mental state is relevant as an aggravating or attenuating circumstance when meting out punishment. This dissertation analyses whether EU antitrust law takes this element into account and whether it should do so | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Antitrust law / European Union countries | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Criminal intent | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Intention criminelle | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Antitrust law | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Criminal intent | |
| 653 | 2 | |a European Union countries | |
| 830 | 0 | |a International competition law series |v 85 |w (DE-604)BV014209489 |9 85 | |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033619703 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1819313097686384642 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Blockx, Jan |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1216437165 |
| author_facet | Blockx, Jan |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Blockx, Jan |
| author_variant | j b jb |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048239166 |
| contents | The concept of mens rea -- Mens rea in Article 101 TFEU -- Mens rea in Article 102 TFEU -- Mens rea in the enforcement of the antitrust rules -- Evaluation of the role of mens rea in EU antitrust law |
| ctrlnum | (DE-599)BVBBV048239166 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02165nam a2200385 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048239166</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230206 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220523s2020 xx b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789403523538</subfield><subfield code="9">978-94-035-2353-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9403523530</subfield><subfield code="9">94-035-2353-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048239166</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Blockx, Jan</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1216437165</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Mens rea in EU antitrust law</subfield><subfield code="b">when intentions matter</subfield><subfield code="c">Jan Blockx</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Mens rea in European Union antitrust law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands</subfield><subfield code="b">Wolters Kluwer</subfield><subfield code="c">[2020]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xi, 251 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="c">25 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">International competition law series</subfield><subfield code="v">85</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2="0"><subfield code="t">The concept of mens rea --</subfield><subfield code="t">Mens rea in Article 101 TFEU --</subfield><subfield code="t">Mens rea in Article 102 TFEU --</subfield><subfield code="t">Mens rea in the enforcement of the antitrust rules --</subfield><subfield code="t">Evaluation of the role of mens rea in EU antitrust law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The maxim actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea expresses the idea that someone who committed an act prohibited by the criminal law can generally only be punished if he or she did so with a specific state of mind. The most serious offences are normally considered those that involve an intention to conduct oneself unlawfully or to cause an unlawful result. Usually the knowledge of the material elements of the offence is equated with intention. Even for strict liability and negligent offences, the perpetrator's mental state is relevant as an aggravating or attenuating circumstance when meting out punishment. This dissertation analyses whether EU antitrust law takes this element into account and whether it should do so</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Antitrust law / European Union countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Criminal intent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Intention criminelle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Antitrust law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Criminal intent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">European Union countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International competition law series</subfield><subfield code="v">85</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV014209489</subfield><subfield code="9">85</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033619703</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048239166 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-24T09:22:54Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789403523538 9403523530 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033619703 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-M382 |
| owner_facet | DE-M382 |
| physical | xi, 251 Seiten 25 cm |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSearch | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer |
| record_format | marc |
| series | International competition law series |
| series2 | International competition law series |
| spelling | Blockx, Jan Verfasser (DE-588)1216437165 aut Mens rea in EU antitrust law when intentions matter Jan Blockx Mens rea in European Union antitrust law Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands Wolters Kluwer [2020] xi, 251 Seiten 25 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier International competition law series 85 The concept of mens rea -- Mens rea in Article 101 TFEU -- Mens rea in Article 102 TFEU -- Mens rea in the enforcement of the antitrust rules -- Evaluation of the role of mens rea in EU antitrust law The maxim actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea expresses the idea that someone who committed an act prohibited by the criminal law can generally only be punished if he or she did so with a specific state of mind. The most serious offences are normally considered those that involve an intention to conduct oneself unlawfully or to cause an unlawful result. Usually the knowledge of the material elements of the offence is equated with intention. Even for strict liability and negligent offences, the perpetrator's mental state is relevant as an aggravating or attenuating circumstance when meting out punishment. This dissertation analyses whether EU antitrust law takes this element into account and whether it should do so Antitrust law / European Union countries Criminal intent Intention criminelle Antitrust law European Union countries International competition law series 85 (DE-604)BV014209489 85 |
| spellingShingle | Blockx, Jan Mens rea in EU antitrust law when intentions matter International competition law series The concept of mens rea -- Mens rea in Article 101 TFEU -- Mens rea in Article 102 TFEU -- Mens rea in the enforcement of the antitrust rules -- Evaluation of the role of mens rea in EU antitrust law |
| title | Mens rea in EU antitrust law when intentions matter |
| title_alt | Mens rea in European Union antitrust law The concept of mens rea -- Mens rea in Article 101 TFEU -- Mens rea in Article 102 TFEU -- Mens rea in the enforcement of the antitrust rules -- Evaluation of the role of mens rea in EU antitrust law |
| title_auth | Mens rea in EU antitrust law when intentions matter |
| title_exact_search | Mens rea in EU antitrust law when intentions matter |
| title_full | Mens rea in EU antitrust law when intentions matter Jan Blockx |
| title_fullStr | Mens rea in EU antitrust law when intentions matter Jan Blockx |
| title_full_unstemmed | Mens rea in EU antitrust law when intentions matter Jan Blockx |
| title_short | Mens rea in EU antitrust law |
| title_sort | mens rea in eu antitrust law when intentions matter |
| title_sub | when intentions matter |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV014209489 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT blockxjan mensreaineuantitrustlawwhenintentionsmatter AT blockxjan mensreaineuropeanunionantitrustlaw |