Data Protection Around the World Privacy Laws in Action

Data Protection Around the World Privacy Laws in Action

Weitere Versionen anzeigen (2)
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Kiesow Cortez, Elif (VerfasserIn)
Format: Elektronisch E-Book
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: The Hague T.M.C. Asser Press 2020
Schriftenreihe:Information Technology and Law Ser. v.33
Schlagworte:
Data protection-Law and legislation
Privatrecht
Datenschutz
Rechtsvergleich
Online-Zugang:DE-2070s
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Inhaltsangabe:
  • Intro
  • Series Information
  • Editorial Office
  • Preface
  • Contents
  • Editor and Contributors
  • 1 Data Protection Around the World: An Introduction
  • 1.1 Introduction
  • 1.2 Overview
  • References
  • 2 Data Protection Around the World: Belgium
  • 2.1 Background
  • 2.2 The Belgian Data Protection Landscape Pre-GDPR
  • 2.2.1 The Belgian Constitution
  • 2.3 Data Protection Act of 1992
  • 2.3.1 Secretary of State for Privacy
  • 2.3.2 Prominent Data Protection Authority
  • 2.4 New GDPR-Related Issues
  • 2.4.1 Belgium's Federal Structure
  • 2.4.2 Legal Basis of Data Processing Activities
  • 2.4.3 Exercising Data Protection Rights Online
  • 2.4.4 Interpretations in the Belgian Implementation Law
  • 2.5 Data Protection Disputes in Belgium
  • 2.5.1 SWIFT and the Terrorist Finance Tracking Program
  • 2.5.2 Belgian DPA Versus Facebook
  • 2.6 GDPR Forecast
  • References
  • 3 Data Protection in Estonia
  • 3.1 Data Protection Regulations and Case Law in Estonian Jurisdiction: Origin and Development of Estonian Data Protection Related Legislation and the Personal Data Protection Act
  • 3.1.1 Introduction
  • 3.1.2 The History of the Estonian Data Protection Inspectorate
  • 3.1.3 The Latest Estonian Data Protection Legislation Related to the GDPR
  • 3.1.4 Data Protection Case Law Within Estonian Jurisdiction
  • 3.2 Interaction Between Estonian Data Protection Legislation and the GDPR-Similarities and Differences
  • 3.2.1 Similarities of the GDPR and the Estonian Jurisdiction
  • 3.2.2 Differences Between the GDPR and the Estonian Jurisdiction
  • 3.3 The Most Prominent Issues in the Estonian Jurisdiction Regarding Data Protection Regulations: eGovernance and National Databases in Conjunction with the GDPR
  • 3.3.1 Introduction
  • 3.3.2 The Application and Possibilities of the "Once-Only" Principle in Light of the GDPR.
  • 3.3.3 Legal Bases for Personal Data Processing: GDPR Art 6 Interaction with Pre-GDPR Conditions in Estonia
  • 3.3.4 The Estonian Electronic Communications Act and Data Retention
  • 3.3.5 The Data Retention Directive
  • 3.4 Application of the GDPR in the Jurisdiction of Estonia
  • 3.4.1 GDPR Application in Estonia: Will the Enormous Fines for Data Breaches Make Data Controllers and Processors in Estonia Take Personal Data Protection and Privacy Issues and Requirements More Seriously?
  • 3.4.2 The GDPR-Data Protection Awareness-Raising Masterpiece?
  • 3.4.3 Let's Clean up the Room: GDPR Implementing Regulation in Estonia. Will It Solve All the Questions?
  • References
  • 4 GDPR in France: A Lot of Communication for a Jurisdiction Well Experienced in the Protection of Personal Data
  • 4.1 An Update of the Existing Protection of Personal Data Needed with the Application of the GDPR in France
  • 4.1.1 An Accelerated Procedure of Adoption of the GDPR in France and a Few Changes in the Law of 1978
  • 4.1.2 More Competencies for the CNIL and a Better Defined Territorial Application
  • 4.2 Precisions Given to the Processing of Sensitive Information and Derogations
  • 4.2.1 Legislation and Practice Before 2018 on the Protection of Personal Data
  • 4.3 The Initiative of Protecting Personal Data and Facing the Administrative Necessity of Simplification
  • 4.4 Early Initiative and Late Involvement for a European Harmonization of France
  • 4.5 Attention on the Most Sensitive Data to Be Under Special Regimes (Police, Justice, Secret Services)
  • 4.6 A Structure of the "Informatique et Libertés" Law in 1978 in Compliance with the French Constitutional and Administrative Law
  • 4.7 The Main Rights of Citizens Are Recognized by the French Legislation
  • 4.8 Incomplete Harmonization of the Rules and Procedures Between Databases of the Private and Public Sectors
  • 4.9 Personal Data Officer to Data Protection Officer
  • 4.10 Changes Brought by the GDPR to the French Legal Framework
  • 4.10.1 Limited Modifications to the Law of 1978 Towards More Administrative Simplifications
  • 4.11 Powers of the CNIL Clarified and Strengthened
  • 4.11.1 Controversies and Pending Issues of the Protection of Data in France
  • 4.12 First Year of Application of the GDPR in France: Plans to Rewrite Entirely the 1978 Informatique et Libertés Law, Exceptionally High Number of Complaints, and Substantial Cooperation with Other Authorities Protecting Personal Data in the European Union
  • References
  • 5 Current Data Protection Regulations and Case Law in Greece: Cash as Personal Data, Lengthy Procedures, and Technologies Subjected to Courts' Interpretations
  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.1.1 Cash as Personal Data (And Several "Errors with Manifest Impact" on the System)
  • 5.1.2 Balancing Interests: It Might Take a Long Time
  • 5.1.3 Exercising the Right to Access (Might Take a Long Time Too)
  • 5.1.4 Smart Phones as Filing Systems
  • 5.1.5 Conclusions
  • 5.2 Ways in Which the GDPR Interacts with the Greek Jurisdiction: Towards an Agreement on the Basics?
  • 5.2.1 Introduction
  • 5.2.2 Control and Consent Versus the Free Flow
  • 5.2.3 Emerging Technologies: A Need to Agree on the Basics?
  • 5.2.4 Conclusions
  • 5.3 Most Prominent Issues in Greek Jurisdiction Regarding Data Protection Regulations: Ignorance, Confusion and Misleading
  • 5.3.1 Introduction
  • 5.3.2 E-Reality at Stake
  • 5.3.3 What Do People Know?
  • 5.3.4 Intentions to Mislead
  • 5.3.5 Some Ethical Conclusions
  • 5.4 The GDPR's Potential in Greece: Data Portability as a Means to Enhance Transparency, Accountability, and Trustworthiness
  • 5.4.1 Introduction
  • 5.4.2 User-Centric Platforms to Enforce Transparency, Accountability, and Trustworthiness
  • 5.4.3 Conclusion
  • References
  • 6 Privacy and Personal Data Protection in Indonesia: The Hybrid Paradigm of the Subjective and Objective Approach
  • 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.2 Global Discussion of Privacy Laws and Lessons Learned for Indonesia
  • 6.3 Legal Framework
  • 6.3.1 Indonesian Constitution and Privacy
  • 6.3.2 Privacy in Indonesian Human Rights Law
  • 6.3.3 Privacy as Secrecy of Personal Life Excluding Public Information for Public Interest
  • 6.4 Comparative Study of the European GDPR with the Indonesian Legal System
  • 6.5 Prominent Issues Regarding Personal Data Protection and Online Digital Identity in Indonesia
  • 6.5.1 Spamming or Commercial Promotion
  • 6.5.2 Regarding the Right to Erasure Versus Freedom of the Press
  • 6.5.3 Personal Data Protection Versus Citizen Administration
  • 6.5.4 Authentication of GSM Card Number on Population Data
  • 6.5.5 Searching for Someone's Financial Information in the Context of Tax Search Interests
  • 6.5.6 Fintech Misuse of Contact Number for Harassment Because of Bad Debt
  • 6.6 Implication of GDPR Implementation for Indonesia
  • 6.7 Conclusion
  • 6.8 Recommendations
  • References
  • 7 Data Protection Regulation in the Netherlands
  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 General Comprehensive Personal Data Protection
  • 7.3 Sector Specific Requirements
  • 7.3.1 The Data Protection Law Enforcement Directive
  • 7.3.2 The E-Privacy Directive
  • 7.3.3 The Dutch Personal Records Database Act
  • 7.4 On the Interaction of the GDPR with National Legislation in the Netherlands
  • 7.5 Key Challenges and Developments in Relation to Data Protection Legislation in the Netherlands
  • 7.5.1 Use of Data Subject Access Rights as Supplemental e-Discovery Instruments
  • 7.5.2 Data Transfers Outside the EU
  • 7.5.3 Processing Employee Data Works Council
  • 7.6 The GDPR and the Dutch National Jurisdiction Insights
  • 7.6.1 Data Subject Access Rights as Extrajudicial E-Discovery Instruments
  • 7.6.2 Data Transfers Outside the EU
  • 7.6.3 Processing Employee Data Works Council
  • References
  • 8 The GDPR Influence on the Tanzanian Data Privacy Law and Practice
  • 8.1 Introduction
  • 8.2 Approach and Main Features of the GDPR
  • 8.3 The Tanzanian Data Protection Law Landscape
  • 8.3.1 The Context
  • 8.4 The Regime of Data Protection Law
  • 8.4.1 The Constitutional Right to Privacy
  • 8.4.2 Statutory Law for Protection of Personal Data
  • 8.5 The GDPR Influence on Tanzanian Law Reform
  • 8.6 Conclusion
  • References
  • 9 Data Protection Around the World: Turkey
  • 9.1 Introduction and an Overview of the Turkish Data Protection Law
  • 9.1.1 Introduction
  • 9.1.2 Data Protection Legislation in Turkey
  • 9.1.3 Case Law
  • 9.2 How Does the GDPR Interact with Turkish Jurisdiction?
  • 9.2.1 Field of Application and Terms
  • 9.2.2 Principles and Exceptions
  • 9.2.3 Rights, Duties and Remedies
  • 9.3 Prominent Issues
  • 9.3.1 Frequent Use of Personal Data
  • 9.3.2 Activities of the DPA
  • 9.3.3 The Nature of the DPA
  • 9.4 Application of the GDPR in Turkey
  • 9.4.1 Extraterritoriality of the GDPR
  • 9.4.2 Turkey's Harmonisation with the EU and the GDPR
  • 9.5 Conclusion
  • References
  • 10 The United States and the EU's General Data Protection Regulation
  • 10.1 Privacy and Data Protection Regulation in the United States
  • 10.1.1 The Fourth Amendment
  • 10.1.2 Sectoral Laws
  • 10.1.3 Privacy Torts
  • 10.1.4 The Federal Trade Commission
  • 10.2 The Interaction of the GDPR and U.S. Law
  • 10.2.1 The Right to Be Forgotten
  • 10.2.2 RTBF and the First Amendment
  • 10.3 Prominent Issues in U.S. Privacy and Data Protection Law
  • 10.3.1 Privacy Harms
  • 10.3.2 Data Breaches
  • 10.4 The Effect of the GDPR on Privacy and Data Protection in the United States: Resolving Issues or Making Things Worse?

Ähnliche Einträge