Balkan Yearbook of European and International Law 2019
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cham
Springer International Publishing AG
2020
|
Schriftenreihe: | Balkan Yearbook of European and International Law Ser.
v.2019 |
Schlagworte: | |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Inhaltsangabe:
- Intro
- Editorial
- Contents
- Editors and Contributors
- One Size Fits All? Transparency in Investment and Commercial Arbitration
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Transparency in International Economic Law
- 3 Transparency in Investment Arbitration
- 3.1 Public Law Dimensions in Investment Arbitration
- 3.1.1 Transparency Deduced from Democratic Legitimacy
- 3.1.2 Transparency Deduced from the Rule of Law
- 3.2 Recent Developments Towards Transparency in Investment Arbitration
- 3.3 Interim Conclusions
- 4 Transparency or Confidentiality in International Commercial Arbitration
- 4.1 Party Autonomy as the Backbone of International Commercial Arbitration
- 4.1.1 Choosing Confidentiality for Arbitral Proceedings
- 4.1.2 Choosing Arbitration Rules: Default Option for Confidentiality
- 4.1.3 No Confidentiality Provisions: Is Confidentiality Implied?
- 4.2 Developments in Transparency: The Retreat of Party Autonomy?
- 4.3 Party Autonomy Far from Being an Absolute Right: Balancing Other Interests
- 4.4 Interim Conclusions
- 5 Conclusion: Can We Transfer Developments in Transparency from Investment Arbitration to International Commercial Arbitration?
- References
- Cross-Border Enforcement of Mediated Settlement Agreements and Potential Impact on the Practice of International Arbitration
- 1 Introduction: The View from Singapore
- 2 Key International Dispute Resolution Trends Impacting International Arbitration
- 2.1 Calls for Greater Transparency
- 2.2 Third-Party Funding
- 2.3 Regional Shifts
- 2.4 International Commercial Courts
- 3 Advent of the Singapore Convention on Mediation
- 3.1 Origin and Purpose
- 3.2 Scope
- 3.3 Enforcement
- 4 Predictions and Impact on International Arbitration
- 4.1 Taking the Best, Leaving the Rest
- 4.2 Increased Access to Justice for MSMEs
- 4.3 More Choice for IDR Users
- 5 Conclusion
- References
- Third-Party Funding in Arbitration: A Case for Mandatory Disclosure?
- 1 Third-Party Funding as a Typical Scenario Triggering Requests for Disclosure
- 2 Shall a Party Be Under a Duty to Disclose Third-Party Funding?
- 2.1 Pros
- 2.1.1 Important Element When Deciding on Security for Costs
- 2.1.2 Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrators Are at Risk Without Mandatory Disclosure
- 2.1.2.1 Disclosure by Arbitrators
- 2.1.2.2 Disclosure by Party or Counsel
- 2.1.3 Sanctions for Non-disclosure
- 2.2 Cons
- 2.2.1 Disclosure Duties Are Unnecessary
- 2.2.2 Disclosure Duties are Impractical
- 2.2.3 No Possibility to Directly Force A Party to Disclose
- 2.2.4 Protection of Sensitive Information
- 3 Discussion and Conclusion
- References
- Arbitrability of Shareholder Disputes in Bosnian Law
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Legal Boundaries on the Control of the Legality of Shareholders' Decisions
- 3 Arbitration vs. Bosnian Civil Courts
- 4 Issue of Arbitrability in Bosnian Law
- 5 Law on Companies: Ius strictum or Ius dispositivum?
- 6 How to Negotiate Arbitration Clauses
- 7 Participation of Shareholders in Arbitration Proceeding
- 8 Modern Tendencies
- 9 Conclusion
- References
- Intra-EU Arbitral Awards After Achmea: Recognition and Enforcement Within the European Union Under the New York Convention
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Increasing Interplay Between the Intra-EU BITs and the EU Legal Order
- 2.1 Brief History of the Intra-EU BITs
- 2.2 Investment Arbitration Cases Involving the Question of Compatibility of Intra-EU BITs with EU Law Before Achmea
- 3 Does the Achmea Ruling Really Affect Other Intra-EU Arbitral Awards?
- 3.1 The Possible Interpretation or Application of EU Law by the Arbitral Tribunal
- 3.2 Authority to Make Preliminary References to the CJEU Under Article 267 TFEU.
- 3.3 Judicial Review of Intra-EU Arbitral Awards by a Court of a Member State
- 4 Recognition and Enforcement of Intra-EU Arbitral Awards After Achmea
- 4.1 Invalidity of the Arbitration Agreement
- 4.2 Violation of Public Policy
- 5 Conclusion
- References
- Granting and Enforcing Interim Measures in International Commercial Arbitration in Bosnia and Herzegovina
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Reasons and Forms of Interim Measures in International Commercial Arbitration
- 3 Enforcement of Interim Measures Ordered by the Arbitral Tribunal
- 3.1 General Overview
- 3.2 Enforcement of Interim Measures in Slovenia, Serbia and Croatia
- 3.3 Enforcement of Interim Measures in Bosnia and Herzegovina
- 4 Granting Interim Measures by State Courts in Support of Arbitration
- 4.1 General Overview
- 4.2 Interim Measures in Slovenia, Serbia and Croatia
- 4.3 Interim Measures in Bosnia and Herzegovina
- 4.3.1 General Overview
- 4.3.2 Jurisdiction of the State Courts to Order Interim Measures in Support of Arbitration
- 5 Conclusion
- References
- EU Directive on Unfair Trading Practices in Business-to-Business Relationships in the Agricultural and Food Supply Chain: Dipp...
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Background
- 3 Economic Agents Covered by the UTP Directive (ratione personae)
- 4 Scope rationae materiae of the UTP Directive
- 5 Public Enforcement Institutions and Proceedings
- 6 Conclusion
- References
- The Effectiveness of Judicial Enforcement of the EU Consumer Protection Law
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Effective Enforcement of the EU Consumer Protection Law
- 3 Judicial Protection vs. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- 4 The Role of MS' Courts in the Application of the EU Consumer Protection Law
- 4.1 Principles of Effectiveness and Equivalence in the EU Consumer Protection Law
- 4.2 Ex officio Application of the EU Consumer Protection Law
- 5 Concluding Remarks
- References
- The Democratic Deficit of the EU: Two Schools Under One Roof
- 1 The Theoretical Debate
- 2 Democratic Deficit School
- 2.1 The Institutional Aspect of the Democratic Deficit
- 2.1.1 Democratic Deficit Is the Result of sui generis Institutional Architecture
- 2.1.2 Democratic Deficit Is the Result of Present Technocracy
- 2.2 The Socio-Psychological Aspect of the Democratic Deficit
- 2.3 The Concept of a Standard Version
- 3 The Non-Conformist School
- 3.1 The EU as an International Organization
- 3.2 The EU as a Regulatory Agency
- 3.3 Final Touches
- 4 Conclusion
- References
- Some Private International Law Aspects of European Economic Migration
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Economic Migration in the European Union
- 3 Interaction Between Private International Law and Migration Law
- 4 Private International Law Instruments Regulating the Status of Migrant Workers in the EU
- 4.1 Recognition of Foreign Public Documents/Court Decisions with the Function of Regulating the Status of Migrant Workers in t...
- 4.2 International Jurisdiction Rules and the Law Applicable to Individual Employment Contracts in relation to European Economi...
- 5 Concluding Remarks
- References