Balkan Yearbook of European and International Law 2019

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Meskić, Zlatan (VerfasserIn)
Format: Elektronisch E-Book
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Cham Springer International Publishing AG 2020
Schriftenreihe:Balkan Yearbook of European and International Law Ser. v.2019
Schlagworte:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Inhaltsangabe:
  • Intro
  • Editorial
  • Contents
  • Editors and Contributors
  • One Size Fits All? Transparency in Investment and Commercial Arbitration
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Transparency in International Economic Law
  • 3 Transparency in Investment Arbitration
  • 3.1 Public Law Dimensions in Investment Arbitration
  • 3.1.1 Transparency Deduced from Democratic Legitimacy
  • 3.1.2 Transparency Deduced from the Rule of Law
  • 3.2 Recent Developments Towards Transparency in Investment Arbitration
  • 3.3 Interim Conclusions
  • 4 Transparency or Confidentiality in International Commercial Arbitration
  • 4.1 Party Autonomy as the Backbone of International Commercial Arbitration
  • 4.1.1 Choosing Confidentiality for Arbitral Proceedings
  • 4.1.2 Choosing Arbitration Rules: Default Option for Confidentiality
  • 4.1.3 No Confidentiality Provisions: Is Confidentiality Implied?
  • 4.2 Developments in Transparency: The Retreat of Party Autonomy?
  • 4.3 Party Autonomy Far from Being an Absolute Right: Balancing Other Interests
  • 4.4 Interim Conclusions
  • 5 Conclusion: Can We Transfer Developments in Transparency from Investment Arbitration to International Commercial Arbitration?
  • References
  • Cross-Border Enforcement of Mediated Settlement Agreements and Potential Impact on the Practice of International Arbitration
  • 1 Introduction: The View from Singapore
  • 2 Key International Dispute Resolution Trends Impacting International Arbitration
  • 2.1 Calls for Greater Transparency
  • 2.2 Third-Party Funding
  • 2.3 Regional Shifts
  • 2.4 International Commercial Courts
  • 3 Advent of the Singapore Convention on Mediation
  • 3.1 Origin and Purpose
  • 3.2 Scope
  • 3.3 Enforcement
  • 4 Predictions and Impact on International Arbitration
  • 4.1 Taking the Best, Leaving the Rest
  • 4.2 Increased Access to Justice for MSMEs
  • 4.3 More Choice for IDR Users
  • 5 Conclusion
  • References
  • Third-Party Funding in Arbitration: A Case for Mandatory Disclosure?
  • 1 Third-Party Funding as a Typical Scenario Triggering Requests for Disclosure
  • 2 Shall a Party Be Under a Duty to Disclose Third-Party Funding?
  • 2.1 Pros
  • 2.1.1 Important Element When Deciding on Security for Costs
  • 2.1.2 Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrators Are at Risk Without Mandatory Disclosure
  • 2.1.2.1 Disclosure by Arbitrators
  • 2.1.2.2 Disclosure by Party or Counsel
  • 2.1.3 Sanctions for Non-disclosure
  • 2.2 Cons
  • 2.2.1 Disclosure Duties Are Unnecessary
  • 2.2.2 Disclosure Duties are Impractical
  • 2.2.3 No Possibility to Directly Force A Party to Disclose
  • 2.2.4 Protection of Sensitive Information
  • 3 Discussion and Conclusion
  • References
  • Arbitrability of Shareholder Disputes in Bosnian Law
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Legal Boundaries on the Control of the Legality of Shareholders' Decisions
  • 3 Arbitration vs. Bosnian Civil Courts
  • 4 Issue of Arbitrability in Bosnian Law
  • 5 Law on Companies: Ius strictum or Ius dispositivum?
  • 6 How to Negotiate Arbitration Clauses
  • 7 Participation of Shareholders in Arbitration Proceeding
  • 8 Modern Tendencies
  • 9 Conclusion
  • References
  • Intra-EU Arbitral Awards After Achmea: Recognition and Enforcement Within the European Union Under the New York Convention
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Increasing Interplay Between the Intra-EU BITs and the EU Legal Order
  • 2.1 Brief History of the Intra-EU BITs
  • 2.2 Investment Arbitration Cases Involving the Question of Compatibility of Intra-EU BITs with EU Law Before Achmea
  • 3 Does the Achmea Ruling Really Affect Other Intra-EU Arbitral Awards?
  • 3.1 The Possible Interpretation or Application of EU Law by the Arbitral Tribunal
  • 3.2 Authority to Make Preliminary References to the CJEU Under Article 267 TFEU.
  • 3.3 Judicial Review of Intra-EU Arbitral Awards by a Court of a Member State
  • 4 Recognition and Enforcement of Intra-EU Arbitral Awards After Achmea
  • 4.1 Invalidity of the Arbitration Agreement
  • 4.2 Violation of Public Policy
  • 5 Conclusion
  • References
  • Granting and Enforcing Interim Measures in International Commercial Arbitration in Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Reasons and Forms of Interim Measures in International Commercial Arbitration
  • 3 Enforcement of Interim Measures Ordered by the Arbitral Tribunal
  • 3.1 General Overview
  • 3.2 Enforcement of Interim Measures in Slovenia, Serbia and Croatia
  • 3.3 Enforcement of Interim Measures in Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • 4 Granting Interim Measures by State Courts in Support of Arbitration
  • 4.1 General Overview
  • 4.2 Interim Measures in Slovenia, Serbia and Croatia
  • 4.3 Interim Measures in Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • 4.3.1 General Overview
  • 4.3.2 Jurisdiction of the State Courts to Order Interim Measures in Support of Arbitration
  • 5 Conclusion
  • References
  • EU Directive on Unfair Trading Practices in Business-to-Business Relationships in the Agricultural and Food Supply Chain: Dipp...
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Background
  • 3 Economic Agents Covered by the UTP Directive (ratione personae)
  • 4 Scope rationae materiae of the UTP Directive
  • 5 Public Enforcement Institutions and Proceedings
  • 6 Conclusion
  • References
  • The Effectiveness of Judicial Enforcement of the EU Consumer Protection Law
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Effective Enforcement of the EU Consumer Protection Law
  • 3 Judicial Protection vs. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
  • 4 The Role of MS' Courts in the Application of the EU Consumer Protection Law
  • 4.1 Principles of Effectiveness and Equivalence in the EU Consumer Protection Law
  • 4.2 Ex officio Application of the EU Consumer Protection Law
  • 5 Concluding Remarks
  • References
  • The Democratic Deficit of the EU: Two Schools Under One Roof
  • 1 The Theoretical Debate
  • 2 Democratic Deficit School
  • 2.1 The Institutional Aspect of the Democratic Deficit
  • 2.1.1 Democratic Deficit Is the Result of sui generis Institutional Architecture
  • 2.1.2 Democratic Deficit Is the Result of Present Technocracy
  • 2.2 The Socio-Psychological Aspect of the Democratic Deficit
  • 2.3 The Concept of a Standard Version
  • 3 The Non-Conformist School
  • 3.1 The EU as an International Organization
  • 3.2 The EU as a Regulatory Agency
  • 3.3 Final Touches
  • 4 Conclusion
  • References
  • Some Private International Law Aspects of European Economic Migration
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Economic Migration in the European Union
  • 3 Interaction Between Private International Law and Migration Law
  • 4 Private International Law Instruments Regulating the Status of Migrant Workers in the EU
  • 4.1 Recognition of Foreign Public Documents/Court Decisions with the Function of Regulating the Status of Migrant Workers in t...
  • 4.2 International Jurisdiction Rules and the Law Applicable to Individual Employment Contracts in relation to European Economi...
  • 5 Concluding Remarks
  • References