Why has the crisis been bad for private pensions, but good for the flat tax? The sustainability of ‘neoliberal’ reforms in the new EU member states
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Brussels [Belgium]
CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies
2011
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047450700 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210902s2011 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789461381491 |9 978-94-6138-149-1 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol833213 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1268197144 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047450700 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Beblavý, Miroslav |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Why has the crisis been bad for private pensions, but good for the flat tax? |b The sustainability of ‘neoliberal’ reforms in the new EU member states |c Miroslav Beblavý |
| 264 | 1 | |a Brussels [Belgium] |b CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies |c 2011 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2011 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 23) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a In this paper, we examine two questions related to the sustainability of the major, neoliberal, economic and social reforms in the new EU member states, namely the flat income tax and private pension pillars. First, we look at the relationship between the political consensus/controversy at the time major policy reforms were passed and the future sustainability of these reforms after a change of government. Second, we explore what we call a paradox of reverse sustainability, where by the flat income tax has been more politically resilient during the global financial and economic crisis than private pensions, even though ex ante expectations and the literature would lead us to expect the opposite. The paper shows that controversy at the time the reforms were passed had no effect on subsequent sustainability, and the levels of partisanship and public support with regard to a specific reform seemless important than the political costs and benefits. We also find that despite their apparent neoliberalbent, the two policies are versatile enough to be shaped towards a variety of policy goals, allowing their introduction and retention in a variety of economic and social circumstances. In other words, even though private pensions and particularly the flat tax have powerful political connotations, they are by no means policy strait jackets | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Labor relations | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Economic policy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Government/Political systems | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Welfare systems | |
| 650 | 4 | |a EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fiscal Politics / Budgeting | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Central and Eastern European Online Library |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032852698 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/book-detail?id=833213 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804182749223845888 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Beblavý, Miroslav |
| author_facet | Beblavý, Miroslav |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Beblavý, Miroslav |
| author_variant | m b mb |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047450700 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol833213 (OCoLC)1268197144 (DE-599)BVBBV047450700 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02820nmm a2200421zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047450700</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210902s2011 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789461381491</subfield><subfield code="9">978-94-6138-149-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol833213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1268197144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047450700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Beblavý, Miroslav</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Why has the crisis been bad for private pensions, but good for the flat tax?</subfield><subfield code="b">The sustainability of ‘neoliberal’ reforms in the new EU member states</subfield><subfield code="c">Miroslav Beblavý</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Brussels [Belgium]</subfield><subfield code="b">CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 23)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this paper, we examine two questions related to the sustainability of the major, neoliberal, economic and social reforms in the new EU member states, namely the flat income tax and private pension pillars. First, we look at the relationship between the political consensus/controversy at the time major policy reforms were passed and the future sustainability of these reforms after a change of government. Second, we explore what we call a paradox of reverse sustainability, where by the flat income tax has been more politically resilient during the global financial and economic crisis than private pensions, even though ex ante expectations and the literature would lead us to expect the opposite. The paper shows that controversy at the time the reforms were passed had no effect on subsequent sustainability, and the levels of partisanship and public support with regard to a specific reform seemless important than the political costs and benefits. We also find that despite their apparent neoliberalbent, the two policies are versatile enough to be shaped towards a variety of policy goals, allowing their introduction and retention in a variety of economic and social circumstances. In other words, even though private pensions and particularly the flat tax have powerful political connotations, they are by no means policy strait jackets</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Labor relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economic policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Government/Political systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Welfare systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fiscal Politics / Budgeting</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Central and Eastern European Online Library</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032852698</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/book-detail?id=833213</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047450700 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T18:03:13Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:12:29Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789461381491 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032852698 |
| oclc_num | 1268197144 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 23) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publishDateSearch | 2011 |
| publishDateSort | 2011 |
| publisher | CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Beblavý, Miroslav Verfasser aut Why has the crisis been bad for private pensions, but good for the flat tax? The sustainability of ‘neoliberal’ reforms in the new EU member states Miroslav Beblavý Brussels [Belgium] CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies 2011 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2011 1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 23) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier In this paper, we examine two questions related to the sustainability of the major, neoliberal, economic and social reforms in the new EU member states, namely the flat income tax and private pension pillars. First, we look at the relationship between the political consensus/controversy at the time major policy reforms were passed and the future sustainability of these reforms after a change of government. Second, we explore what we call a paradox of reverse sustainability, where by the flat income tax has been more politically resilient during the global financial and economic crisis than private pensions, even though ex ante expectations and the literature would lead us to expect the opposite. The paper shows that controversy at the time the reforms were passed had no effect on subsequent sustainability, and the levels of partisanship and public support with regard to a specific reform seemless important than the political costs and benefits. We also find that despite their apparent neoliberalbent, the two policies are versatile enough to be shaped towards a variety of policy goals, allowing their introduction and retention in a variety of economic and social circumstances. In other words, even though private pensions and particularly the flat tax have powerful political connotations, they are by no means policy strait jackets Labor relations Economic policy Government/Political systems Welfare systems EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment Fiscal Politics / Budgeting Central and Eastern European Online Library Sonstige oth |
| spellingShingle | Beblavý, Miroslav Why has the crisis been bad for private pensions, but good for the flat tax? The sustainability of ‘neoliberal’ reforms in the new EU member states Labor relations Economic policy Government/Political systems Welfare systems EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment Fiscal Politics / Budgeting |
| title | Why has the crisis been bad for private pensions, but good for the flat tax? The sustainability of ‘neoliberal’ reforms in the new EU member states |
| title_auth | Why has the crisis been bad for private pensions, but good for the flat tax? The sustainability of ‘neoliberal’ reforms in the new EU member states |
| title_exact_search | Why has the crisis been bad for private pensions, but good for the flat tax? The sustainability of ‘neoliberal’ reforms in the new EU member states |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Why has the crisis been bad for private pensions, but good for the flat tax? The sustainability of ‘neoliberal’ reforms in the new EU member states |
| title_full | Why has the crisis been bad for private pensions, but good for the flat tax? The sustainability of ‘neoliberal’ reforms in the new EU member states Miroslav Beblavý |
| title_fullStr | Why has the crisis been bad for private pensions, but good for the flat tax? The sustainability of ‘neoliberal’ reforms in the new EU member states Miroslav Beblavý |
| title_full_unstemmed | Why has the crisis been bad for private pensions, but good for the flat tax? The sustainability of ‘neoliberal’ reforms in the new EU member states Miroslav Beblavý |
| title_short | Why has the crisis been bad for private pensions, but good for the flat tax? |
| title_sort | why has the crisis been bad for private pensions but good for the flat tax the sustainability of neoliberal reforms in the new eu member states |
| title_sub | The sustainability of ‘neoliberal’ reforms in the new EU member states |
| topic | Labor relations Economic policy Government/Political systems Welfare systems EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment Fiscal Politics / Budgeting |
| topic_facet | Labor relations Economic policy Government/Political systems Welfare systems EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment Fiscal Politics / Budgeting |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT beblavymiroslav whyhasthecrisisbeenbadforprivatepensionsbutgoodfortheflattaxthesustainabilityofneoliberalreformsintheneweumemberstates AT centralandeasterneuropeanonlinelibrary whyhasthecrisisbeenbadforprivatepensionsbutgoodfortheflattaxthesustainabilityofneoliberalreformsintheneweumemberstates |