Proportionality in action comparative and empirical perspectives on the judicial practice
"The aim of this series is to produce leading monographs in constitutional law. All areas of constitutional law and public law fall within the ambit of the series, including human rights and civil liberties law, administrative law, as well as constitutional theory and the history of constitutio...
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere Verfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge ; New York ; Port Melbourne ; New Delhi ; Singapore
Cambridge University Press
2020
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Cambridge studies in constitutional law
[22] |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a22000008cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV046715725 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20230103 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 200511s2020 xx |||| b||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781108497589 |c Hardback |9 978-1-108-49758-9 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1164615403 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV046715725 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-29 |a DE-739 |a DE-12 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 342/.0011 | |
| 084 | |a PL 625 |0 (DE-625)137089: |2 rvk | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Proportionality in action |b comparative and empirical perspectives on the judicial practice |c edited by Mordechai Kremnitzer (The Israel Denocracy Institute), Talya Steiner (Hebrew University of Jerusalem and The Israel Democracy Institute), Andrej Lang (Martin-Luther- University Halle-Wittenberg and The Israel Democracy Institute) |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge ; New York ; Port Melbourne ; New Delhi ; Singapore |b Cambridge University Press |c 2020 | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2020 | |
| 300 | |a xlix, 638 Seiten |b Diagramme | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Cambridge studies in constitutional law |v [22] | |
| 500 | |a Zählung ermittelt | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a "The aim of this series is to produce leading monographs in constitutional law. All areas of constitutional law and public law fall within the ambit of the series, including human rights and civil liberties law, administrative law, as well as constitutional theory and the history of constitutional law. A wide variety of scholarly approaches is encouraged, with the governing criterion being simply that the work is of interest to an international audience. Thus, works concerned with only one jurisdiction will be included in the series as appropriate, while, at the same time, the series will include works which are explicitly comparative or theoretical - or both. The series editor likewise welcomes proposals that work at the intersection of constitutional and international law, or that seek to bridge the gaps between civil law systems, the US, and the common law jurisdictions of the Commonwealth" | |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Indien |b Supreme Court |0 (DE-588)14122-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Polen |b Trybunał Konstytucyjny |0 (DE-588)5016105-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Kanada |b Supreme Court |0 (DE-588)14216-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Südafrika |b Constitutional Court |0 (DE-588)5190126-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Deutschland |b Bundesverfassungsgericht |0 (DE-588)2117905-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Israel |b Bet ha-Mishpaṭ ha-ʿElyon |0 (DE-588)14513-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 4 | |a Proportionality in law | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz |0 (DE-588)4191765-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4143413-4 |a Aufsatzsammlung |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Deutschland |b Bundesverfassungsgericht |0 (DE-588)2117905-0 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Kanada |b Supreme Court |0 (DE-588)14216-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Südafrika |b Constitutional Court |0 (DE-588)5190126-2 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Israel |b Bet ha-Mishpaṭ ha-ʿElyon |0 (DE-588)14513-0 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Polen |b Trybunał Konstytucyjny |0 (DE-588)5016105-2 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |a Indien |b Supreme Court |0 (DE-588)14122-7 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 6 | |a Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz |0 (DE-588)4191765-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kremnitzer, Mordechai |d 1948- |0 (DE-588)1016118066 |4 edt | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Steiner, Talya |d ca. 20./21. Jh. |0 (DE-588)1210587955 |4 edt | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lang, Andrej |d ca. 20./21. Jh. |0 (DE-588)1176530747 |4 edt | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-1-108-57848-6 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Cambridge studies in constitutional law |v [22] |w (DE-604)BV041094015 |9 22 | |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032126051 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1819308670764187651 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author2 | Kremnitzer, Mordechai 1948- Steiner, Talya ca. 20./21. Jh Lang, Andrej ca. 20./21. Jh |
| author2_role | edt edt edt |
| author2_variant | m k mk t s ts a l al |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1016118066 (DE-588)1210587955 (DE-588)1176530747 |
| author_facet | Kremnitzer, Mordechai 1948- Steiner, Talya ca. 20./21. Jh Lang, Andrej ca. 20./21. Jh |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV046715725 |
| classification_rvk | PL 625 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1164615403 (DE-599)BVBBV046715725 |
| dewey-full | 342/.0011 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
| dewey-raw | 342/.0011 |
| dewey-search | 342/.0011 |
| dewey-sort | 3342 211 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03682nam a22005778cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV046715725</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230103 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">200511s2020 xx |||| b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781108497589</subfield><subfield code="c">Hardback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-108-49758-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1164615403</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV046715725</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342/.0011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PL 625</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)137089:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Proportionality in action</subfield><subfield code="b">comparative and empirical perspectives on the judicial practice</subfield><subfield code="c">edited by Mordechai Kremnitzer (The Israel Denocracy Institute), Talya Steiner (Hebrew University of Jerusalem and The Israel Democracy Institute), Andrej Lang (Martin-Luther- University Halle-Wittenberg and The Israel Democracy Institute)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge ; New York ; Port Melbourne ; New Delhi ; Singapore</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xlix, 638 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Diagramme</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cambridge studies in constitutional law</subfield><subfield code="v">[22]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zählung ermittelt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"The aim of this series is to produce leading monographs in constitutional law. All areas of constitutional law and public law fall within the ambit of the series, including human rights and civil liberties law, administrative law, as well as constitutional theory and the history of constitutional law. A wide variety of scholarly approaches is encouraged, with the governing criterion being simply that the work is of interest to an international audience. Thus, works concerned with only one jurisdiction will be included in the series as appropriate, while, at the same time, the series will include works which are explicitly comparative or theoretical - or both. The series editor likewise welcomes proposals that work at the intersection of constitutional and international law, or that seek to bridge the gaps between civil law systems, the US, and the common law jurisdictions of the Commonwealth"</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Indien</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)14122-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Polen</subfield><subfield code="b">Trybunał Konstytucyjny</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5016105-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kanada</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)14216-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Südafrika</subfield><subfield code="b">Constitutional Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5190126-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Deutschland</subfield><subfield code="b">Bundesverfassungsgericht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)2117905-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Israel</subfield><subfield code="b">Bet ha-Mishpaṭ ha-ʿElyon</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)14513-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Proportionality in law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4191765-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4143413-4</subfield><subfield code="a">Aufsatzsammlung</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Deutschland</subfield><subfield code="b">Bundesverfassungsgericht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)2117905-0</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Kanada</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)14216-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Südafrika</subfield><subfield code="b">Constitutional Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5190126-2</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Israel</subfield><subfield code="b">Bet ha-Mishpaṭ ha-ʿElyon</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)14513-0</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Polen</subfield><subfield code="b">Trybunał Konstytucyjny</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5016105-2</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Indien</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)14122-7</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4191765-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kremnitzer, Mordechai</subfield><subfield code="d">1948-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1016118066</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Steiner, Talya</subfield><subfield code="d">ca. 20./21. Jh.</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1210587955</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lang, Andrej</subfield><subfield code="d">ca. 20./21. Jh.</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1176530747</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-108-57848-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cambridge studies in constitutional law</subfield><subfield code="v">[22]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV041094015</subfield><subfield code="9">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032126051</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Aufsatzsammlung |
| id | DE-604.BV046715725 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-24T08:12:27Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781108497589 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032126051 |
| oclc_num | 1164615403 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-29 DE-739 DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-29 DE-739 DE-12 |
| physical | xlix, 638 Seiten Diagramme |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSearch | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Cambridge studies in constitutional law |
| series2 | Cambridge studies in constitutional law |
| spelling | Proportionality in action comparative and empirical perspectives on the judicial practice edited by Mordechai Kremnitzer (The Israel Denocracy Institute), Talya Steiner (Hebrew University of Jerusalem and The Israel Democracy Institute), Andrej Lang (Martin-Luther- University Halle-Wittenberg and The Israel Democracy Institute) Cambridge ; New York ; Port Melbourne ; New Delhi ; Singapore Cambridge University Press 2020 © 2020 xlix, 638 Seiten Diagramme txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Cambridge studies in constitutional law [22] Zählung ermittelt "The aim of this series is to produce leading monographs in constitutional law. All areas of constitutional law and public law fall within the ambit of the series, including human rights and civil liberties law, administrative law, as well as constitutional theory and the history of constitutional law. A wide variety of scholarly approaches is encouraged, with the governing criterion being simply that the work is of interest to an international audience. Thus, works concerned with only one jurisdiction will be included in the series as appropriate, while, at the same time, the series will include works which are explicitly comparative or theoretical - or both. The series editor likewise welcomes proposals that work at the intersection of constitutional and international law, or that seek to bridge the gaps between civil law systems, the US, and the common law jurisdictions of the Commonwealth" Indien Supreme Court (DE-588)14122-7 gnd rswk-swf Polen Trybunał Konstytucyjny (DE-588)5016105-2 gnd rswk-swf Kanada Supreme Court (DE-588)14216-5 gnd rswk-swf Südafrika Constitutional Court (DE-588)5190126-2 gnd rswk-swf Deutschland Bundesverfassungsgericht (DE-588)2117905-0 gnd rswk-swf Israel Bet ha-Mishpaṭ ha-ʿElyon (DE-588)14513-0 gnd rswk-swf Proportionality in law Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz (DE-588)4191765-0 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content Deutschland Bundesverfassungsgericht (DE-588)2117905-0 b Kanada Supreme Court (DE-588)14216-5 b Südafrika Constitutional Court (DE-588)5190126-2 b Israel Bet ha-Mishpaṭ ha-ʿElyon (DE-588)14513-0 b Polen Trybunał Konstytucyjny (DE-588)5016105-2 b Indien Supreme Court (DE-588)14122-7 b Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz (DE-588)4191765-0 s DE-604 Kremnitzer, Mordechai 1948- (DE-588)1016118066 edt Steiner, Talya ca. 20./21. Jh. (DE-588)1210587955 edt Lang, Andrej ca. 20./21. Jh. (DE-588)1176530747 edt Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-1-108-57848-6 Cambridge studies in constitutional law [22] (DE-604)BV041094015 22 |
| spellingShingle | Proportionality in action comparative and empirical perspectives on the judicial practice Cambridge studies in constitutional law Indien Supreme Court (DE-588)14122-7 gnd Polen Trybunał Konstytucyjny (DE-588)5016105-2 gnd Kanada Supreme Court (DE-588)14216-5 gnd Südafrika Constitutional Court (DE-588)5190126-2 gnd Deutschland Bundesverfassungsgericht (DE-588)2117905-0 gnd Israel Bet ha-Mishpaṭ ha-ʿElyon (DE-588)14513-0 gnd Proportionality in law Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz (DE-588)4191765-0 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)14122-7 (DE-588)5016105-2 (DE-588)14216-5 (DE-588)5190126-2 (DE-588)2117905-0 (DE-588)14513-0 (DE-588)4191765-0 (DE-588)4143413-4 |
| title | Proportionality in action comparative and empirical perspectives on the judicial practice |
| title_auth | Proportionality in action comparative and empirical perspectives on the judicial practice |
| title_exact_search | Proportionality in action comparative and empirical perspectives on the judicial practice |
| title_full | Proportionality in action comparative and empirical perspectives on the judicial practice edited by Mordechai Kremnitzer (The Israel Denocracy Institute), Talya Steiner (Hebrew University of Jerusalem and The Israel Democracy Institute), Andrej Lang (Martin-Luther- University Halle-Wittenberg and The Israel Democracy Institute) |
| title_fullStr | Proportionality in action comparative and empirical perspectives on the judicial practice edited by Mordechai Kremnitzer (The Israel Denocracy Institute), Talya Steiner (Hebrew University of Jerusalem and The Israel Democracy Institute), Andrej Lang (Martin-Luther- University Halle-Wittenberg and The Israel Democracy Institute) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Proportionality in action comparative and empirical perspectives on the judicial practice edited by Mordechai Kremnitzer (The Israel Denocracy Institute), Talya Steiner (Hebrew University of Jerusalem and The Israel Democracy Institute), Andrej Lang (Martin-Luther- University Halle-Wittenberg and The Israel Democracy Institute) |
| title_short | Proportionality in action |
| title_sort | proportionality in action comparative and empirical perspectives on the judicial practice |
| title_sub | comparative and empirical perspectives on the judicial practice |
| topic | Indien Supreme Court (DE-588)14122-7 gnd Polen Trybunał Konstytucyjny (DE-588)5016105-2 gnd Kanada Supreme Court (DE-588)14216-5 gnd Südafrika Constitutional Court (DE-588)5190126-2 gnd Deutschland Bundesverfassungsgericht (DE-588)2117905-0 gnd Israel Bet ha-Mishpaṭ ha-ʿElyon (DE-588)14513-0 gnd Proportionality in law Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz (DE-588)4191765-0 gnd |
| topic_facet | Indien Supreme Court Polen Trybunał Konstytucyjny Kanada Supreme Court Südafrika Constitutional Court Deutschland Bundesverfassungsgericht Israel Bet ha-Mishpaṭ ha-ʿElyon Proportionality in law Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz Aufsatzsammlung |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV041094015 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kremnitzermordechai proportionalityinactioncomparativeandempiricalperspectivesonthejudicialpractice AT steinertalya proportionalityinactioncomparativeandempiricalperspectivesonthejudicialpractice AT langandrej proportionalityinactioncomparativeandempiricalperspectivesonthejudicialpractice |