Rethinking punishment

The age-old debate about what constitutes just punishment has become deadlocked. Retributivists continue to privilege desert over all else, and consequentialists continue to privilege punishment's expected positive consequences, such as deterrence or rehabilitation, over all else. In this impor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Zaibert, Leo 1966- (VerfasserIn)
Format: Elektronisch E-Book
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2018
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:DE-12
DE-473
URL des Erstveröffentlichers
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a2200000zc 4500
001 BV045092065
003 DE-604
005 00000000000000.0
007 cr|uuu---uuuuu
008 180718s2018 xx o|||| 00||| eng d
020 |a 9781108151740  |c Online  |9 9781108151740 
024 7 |a 10.1017/9781108151740  |2 doi 
035 |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781108151740 
035 |a (OCoLC)1037875434 
035 |a (DE-599)BVBBV045092065 
040 |a DE-604  |b ger  |e rda 
041 0 |a eng 
049 |a DE-12  |a DE-473 
082 0 |a 172/.2 
100 1 |a Zaibert, Leo  |d 1966-  |e Verfasser  |0 (DE-588)173791166  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Rethinking punishment  |c Leo Zaibert 
264 1 |a Cambridge  |b Cambridge University Press  |c 2018 
300 |a 1 Online-Ressource (x, 265 Seiten) 
336 |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 24 Apr 2018) 
520 |a The age-old debate about what constitutes just punishment has become deadlocked. Retributivists continue to privilege desert over all else, and consequentialists continue to privilege punishment's expected positive consequences, such as deterrence or rehabilitation, over all else. In this important intervention into the debate, Leo Zaibert argues that despite some obvious differences, these traditional positions are structurally very similar, and that the deadlock between them stems from the fact they both oversimplify the problem of punishment. Proponents of these positions pay insufficient attention to the conflicts of values that punishment, even when justified, generates. Mobilizing recent developments in moral philosophy, Zaibert offers a properly pluralistic justification of punishment that is necessarily more complex than its traditional counterparts. An understanding of this complexity should promote a more cautious approach to inflicting punishment on individual wrongdoers and to developing punitive policies and institutions 
650 4 |a Punishment / Philosophy 
650 0 7 |a Rechtsphilosophie  |0 (DE-588)4048821-4  |2 gnd  |9 rswk-swf 
650 0 7 |a Ethik  |0 (DE-588)4015602-3  |2 gnd  |9 rswk-swf 
650 0 7 |a Strafe  |0 (DE-588)4057785-5  |2 gnd  |9 rswk-swf 
689 0 0 |a Strafe  |0 (DE-588)4057785-5  |D s 
689 0 1 |a Rechtsphilosophie  |0 (DE-588)4048821-4  |D s 
689 0 2 |a Ethik  |0 (DE-588)4015602-3  |D s 
689 0 |8 1\p  |5 DE-604 
776 0 8 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druck-Ausgabe  |z 9781107194120 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108151740  |x Verlag  |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers  |3 Volltext 
912 |a ZDB-20-CBO 
883 1 |8 1\p  |a cgwrk  |d 20201028  |q DE-101  |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 
943 1 |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030482815 
966 e |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108151740  |l DE-12  |p ZDB-20-CBO  |q BSB_PDA_CBO  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
966 e |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108151740  |l DE-473  |p ZDB-20-CBO  |q UBG_PDA_CBO  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 

Datensatz im Suchindex

_version_ 1819303417424642048
any_adam_object
author Zaibert, Leo 1966-
author_GND (DE-588)173791166
author_facet Zaibert, Leo 1966-
author_role aut
author_sort Zaibert, Leo 1966-
author_variant l z lz
building Verbundindex
bvnumber BV045092065
collection ZDB-20-CBO
ctrlnum (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781108151740
(OCoLC)1037875434
(DE-599)BVBBV045092065
dewey-full 172/.2
dewey-hundreds 100 - Philosophy & psychology
dewey-ones 172 - Political ethics
dewey-raw 172/.2
dewey-search 172/.2
dewey-sort 3172 12
dewey-tens 170 - Ethics (Moral philosophy)
discipline Philosophie
doi_str_mv 10.1017/9781108151740
format Electronic
eBook
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02908nam a2200481zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV045092065</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180718s2018 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781108151740</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">9781108151740</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/9781108151740</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781108151740</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1037875434</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV045092065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">172/.2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zaibert, Leo</subfield><subfield code="d">1966-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)173791166</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rethinking punishment</subfield><subfield code="c">Leo Zaibert</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (x, 265 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 24 Apr 2018)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The age-old debate about what constitutes just punishment has become deadlocked. Retributivists continue to privilege desert over all else, and consequentialists continue to privilege punishment's expected positive consequences, such as deterrence or rehabilitation, over all else. In this important intervention into the debate, Leo Zaibert argues that despite some obvious differences, these traditional positions are structurally very similar, and that the deadlock between them stems from the fact they both oversimplify the problem of punishment. Proponents of these positions pay insufficient attention to the conflicts of values that punishment, even when justified, generates. Mobilizing recent developments in moral philosophy, Zaibert offers a properly pluralistic justification of punishment that is necessarily more complex than its traditional counterparts. An understanding of this complexity should promote a more cautious approach to inflicting punishment on individual wrongdoers and to developing punitive policies and institutions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Punishment / Philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsphilosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048821-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015602-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Strafe</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4057785-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Strafe</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4057785-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Rechtsphilosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048821-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015602-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">9781107194120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108151740</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030482815</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108151740</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108151740</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
id DE-604.BV045092065
illustrated Not Illustrated
indexdate 2024-12-24T06:49:02Z
institution BVB
isbn 9781108151740
language English
oai_aleph_id oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-030482815
oclc_num 1037875434
open_access_boolean
owner DE-12
DE-473
DE-BY-UBG
owner_facet DE-12
DE-473
DE-BY-UBG
physical 1 Online-Ressource (x, 265 Seiten)
psigel ZDB-20-CBO
ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO
ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO
publishDate 2018
publishDateSearch 2018
publishDateSort 2018
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format marc
spelling Zaibert, Leo 1966- Verfasser (DE-588)173791166 aut
Rethinking punishment Leo Zaibert
Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2018
1 Online-Ressource (x, 265 Seiten)
txt rdacontent
c rdamedia
cr rdacarrier
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 24 Apr 2018)
The age-old debate about what constitutes just punishment has become deadlocked. Retributivists continue to privilege desert over all else, and consequentialists continue to privilege punishment's expected positive consequences, such as deterrence or rehabilitation, over all else. In this important intervention into the debate, Leo Zaibert argues that despite some obvious differences, these traditional positions are structurally very similar, and that the deadlock between them stems from the fact they both oversimplify the problem of punishment. Proponents of these positions pay insufficient attention to the conflicts of values that punishment, even when justified, generates. Mobilizing recent developments in moral philosophy, Zaibert offers a properly pluralistic justification of punishment that is necessarily more complex than its traditional counterparts. An understanding of this complexity should promote a more cautious approach to inflicting punishment on individual wrongdoers and to developing punitive policies and institutions
Punishment / Philosophy
Rechtsphilosophie (DE-588)4048821-4 gnd rswk-swf
Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 gnd rswk-swf
Strafe (DE-588)4057785-5 gnd rswk-swf
Strafe (DE-588)4057785-5 s
Rechtsphilosophie (DE-588)4048821-4 s
Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 s
1\p DE-604
Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 9781107194120
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108151740 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext
1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk
spellingShingle Zaibert, Leo 1966-
Rethinking punishment
Punishment / Philosophy
Rechtsphilosophie (DE-588)4048821-4 gnd
Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 gnd
Strafe (DE-588)4057785-5 gnd
subject_GND (DE-588)4048821-4
(DE-588)4015602-3
(DE-588)4057785-5
title Rethinking punishment
title_auth Rethinking punishment
title_exact_search Rethinking punishment
title_full Rethinking punishment Leo Zaibert
title_fullStr Rethinking punishment Leo Zaibert
title_full_unstemmed Rethinking punishment Leo Zaibert
title_short Rethinking punishment
title_sort rethinking punishment
topic Punishment / Philosophy
Rechtsphilosophie (DE-588)4048821-4 gnd
Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 gnd
Strafe (DE-588)4057785-5 gnd
topic_facet Punishment / Philosophy
Rechtsphilosophie
Ethik
Strafe
url https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108151740
work_keys_str_mv AT zaibertleo rethinkingpunishment