Ideal - nonideal filosofia unei distincţii în teoria dreptăţii
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Romanian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Iaşi
Institutul European
2016
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Colecţia Academica
281 : Seria Filosofie |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Literaturverzeichnis Register // Personenregister Register // Sachregister Abstract |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV044325084 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20171129 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 170524s2016 xx |||| 00||| rum d | ||
| 020 | |a 9786062401719 |9 978-606-24-0171-9 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)992511473 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV044325084 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a rum | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Huzum, Eugen |d ca. 20./21. Jh. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1130261174 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ideal - nonideal |b filosofia unei distincţii în teoria dreptăţii |c Eugen Huzum |
| 264 | 1 | |a Iaşi |b Institutul European |c 2016 | |
| 300 | |a 258 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Colecţia Academica |v 281 |a Seria Filosofie | |
| 546 | |a Zusammenfassung auf Englisch und Französisch | ||
| 600 | 1 | 7 | |a Rawls, John |d 1921-2002 |0 (DE-588)118598678 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Politische Philosophie |0 (DE-588)4076226-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Liberalismus |0 (DE-588)4035582-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gerechtigkeit |0 (DE-588)4020310-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Politische Philosophie |0 (DE-588)4076226-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Liberalismus |0 (DE-588)4035582-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Gerechtigkeit |0 (DE-588)4020310-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Rawls, John |d 1921-2002 |0 (DE-588)118598678 |D p |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Colecţia Academica |v 281 : Seria Filosofie |w (DE-604)BV035808626 |9 281 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029728464&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029728464&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029728464&sequence=000003&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Register // Personenregister |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029728464&sequence=000004&line_number=0004&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Register // Sachregister |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029728464&sequence=000005&line_number=0005&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Abstract |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 100 |e 22/bsb |f 0905 |g 498 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 001.09 |e 22/bsb |f 0905 |g 498 |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029728464 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1819591877483036672 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Cuprins
Cuvânt înainte / 9
Despre concepţia lui Rawls cu privire la distincţia ideal-
nonideal / 29
Despre conceptualizările post-rawlsiene ale distincţiei /181
O distincţie ilegitimă? Despre ideea că „nu există aşa ceva
precum teoria ideală” / 203
Cuvânt de încheiere / 209
Referinţe bibliografice /215
Indice de autori / 241
Indice de concepte / 247
Abstract / 255
R6sum£ / 257
7
Referinţe bibliografice
Anderson, Elizabeth, „What is the Point of Equality?”, în Ethics 109,
2 (1999), pp. 287-337.
----- „How Should Egalitarians Cope with Market Risks? , în
Theoretical Inquiries in Law 9, 1 (2007), pp, 61-92.
-----„The Fundamental Disagreement between Luck Egalitarians and
Relational Egalitarians”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy,
Supplementary Volume 36 (2010): Justice and Equality, pp. 1-
23. Retipărit în Distributive Justice and Access to Advantage:
G A. Cohen s Egalitarianism, (ed.) Alexander Kaufman,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014, pp. 21-39.
----- The Imperative of Integration, Princeton University Press,
Princeton, 2013.
Archard, David şi Colin M. Macleod, (ed.), The Moral and Political
Status of Children, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002.
Archer, Alfred, „Community, Pluralism and Individualistic Pursuits: A
Defence of Why Not Socialism?”, în Social Theory and
Practice 42, 1 (2016), pp. 57-73.
Aristotel, Etica Nicomahică, Editura IRI, Bucureşti, 1998.
Ameson, Richard J., „Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare”, în
Philosophical Studies 56, 1 (1989), pp. 77-93.
-----„Liberalism, Distributive Subjectivism, and Equal Opportunity
for Welfare”, în Philosophy Public Affairs 19, 2 (1990), pp.
158-194.
----- „Postscript”, în Equality: Selected Readings, (ed.) Louis P.
Pojman şi Robert Westmoreland, Oxford University Press,
Oxford, 1997, pp. 228-241.
215
IDEAL-NONIDEAL
----- „Distributive Ethics and Basic Capability Equality: ‘Good
Enough’ is Not Good Enough”, în Capabilities Equality:
Basic Issues and Problems, (ed.) Alexander Kaufman,
Routledge, Londra, 2005, pp. 17-43.
-----„Justice Is Not Equality”, în Ratio 21, 4 (2008), pp. 371—391.
Retipărit în Justice, Equality; and Constructivism: Essays on
G A. Cohen s Rescuing Justice and Equality, (ed.) Brian
Feltham, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, 2009, pp. 5-25.
-----„Why Not Capitalism?”, în Distributive Justice and Access to
Advantage: G. A. Cohen s Egalitarianism, (ed.) Alexander
Kaufman, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014, pp.
207-234.
Arvan, Marcus, „First Steps toward a Nonideal Theory of Justice”, în
Ethics and Global Politics 7, 3 (2014), pp. 95-117.
Audard, Catherine, John Rawls, Routledge, Londra, 2006.
Baderin, Alice, „Two Forms of Realism in Political Theory”, în
European Journal of Political Theory 13, 2 (2013), pp. 132-
153.
Baier, Annette, Postures of The Mind: Essays on Mind and Morals,
Methuen, Londra, 1985.
Baptista, Antonio şi Roberto Merrill, (ed.), Property-Owning
Democracy, în Diacritica 29, 2 (2015), pp. 9-132.
Barber, Benjamin, The Conquest of Politics: Liberal Philosophy in
Democratic Times, Princeton University Press, Princeton,
1988.
Barry, Brian, Theories of Justice, University of California Press,
Berkeley Los Angeles, 1989.
-----Justice as Impartiality, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995.
-----Why Social Justice Matters, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2005.
Basu, Kaushik şi Ravi Kanbur (ed.), Arguments for a Better World:
Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen, 2 volume, Oxford
University Press, Oxford, 2009.
Bertram, Chris, „A Hypothesis about ‘Ideal Theory’ and Justice”, în
Out of the Crooked Timber of Humanity, No Straight Thing
216
H
Referinţe bibliografice
Was Ever Made, http://crookedtimber.org/ 2015/03/12/a-
hypothesis-about-ideal-theory-and-justice/ .
Boettcher, James, „Race, Ideology, and Ideal Theory”, in
Metaphilosophy 40, 2 (2009), pp. 237-259.
Bojer, Hilde, „Children and Theories of Social Justice”, in Feminist
Economics 6, 2 (2000), pp. 23-39.
Boot, Martijn, „The Aim of a Theory of Justice”, in Ethical Theory
and Moral Practice 15, 1 (2012), pp. 7-21.
Bou-Habib, Paul §i Serena Olsaretti, „Autonomy and Children’s Well-
Being”, in The Nature of Children’s Well-Being. Theory and
Practice, (ed.) Alexander Bagattini §i Colin Macleod,
Springer, Dordrecht, 2015, pp. 15-34.
Brandt, Richard, A Theory of the Good and the Right, Clarendon
Press, Oxford, 1979.
Brennan, Geoffrey §i Philip Pettit, „The Feasibility Issue”, in The
Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy, (ed.) Frank
Jackson §i Michael Smith, Oxford University Press, Oxford,
2005, pp. 258-279.
Brennan, Jason, Why Not Capitalism, Routledge, Londra, 2014.
Brennan, Samantha §i Robert Noggle, „John Rawls’s Children”, in
The Philosopher s Child: Critical Perspectives in the Western
Tradition, (ed.) Susan Turner §i Gareth Matthews, University
of Rochester Press, Rochester, 1998, pp. 203-232.
----- „Rawls’s Neglected Childhood: Reflections on the Original
Position, Stability, and the Child’s Sense of Justice”, in The
Idea of Political Liberalism: Essays on Rawls, (ed.) Victoria
Davion §i Clark Wolf, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham,
1999, pp. 47-72.
Brighouse, Harry, „Can Justice as Fairness Accommodate the
Disabled?”, in Social Theory and Practice 27, 4, Special
Issue: Embodied Values: Philosophy and Disabilities (2001),
pp. 537-560.
-----Justice, Polity, Cambridge, 2004.
217
IDEAL-NONIDEAL
Brighouse, Harry şi Ingrid Robeyns, (ed.), Measuring Justice:
Primary Goods and Capabilities, Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, 2010.
Buchanan, Allen, „Justice as Reciprocity versus Subject-Centered Justice”,
în Philosophy Public Affairs 19,3 (1990), pp. 227-252.
-----Justice and Health Care. Selected Essays, Oxford University
Press, New York, 2009.
Carey, Brian, „Towards a ‘Non-Ideal’ Non-Ideal Theory”, în Journal
of Applied Philosophy 32, 2 (2015), pp. 147-162.
Casai, Paula, „Why Sufficiency Is Not Enough”, în Ethics 117, 2
(2007), pp. 296-326.
Chahboun, Naima, „Nonideal Theory and Compliance - A
Clarification”, în European Journal of Political Theory 14, 2
(2015), pp. 229-245.
Cheneval, Francis şi Christoph Laszlo, (ed.), Property-Owning
Democracy - Analyse Kritik 35, 1, Lucius, Stuttgart, 2013.
Claassen, Rutger, „Making Capability Lists: Philosophy versus
Democracy”, în Political Studies 59 (2011), pp. 491-508.
Cobum, Elaine, (ed.), G A. Cohen - Socialist Studies / Etudes
socialistes 8, 1 (2012).
Cohen, G A., „On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice”, în Ethics, 99,
4 (1989), pp. 906-944. Retipărit în G A. Cohen, On the
Currency of Egalitarian Justice, and Other Essays in
Political Philosophy, (ed.) Michael Otsuka, Princeton
University Press, Princeton, 2011, pp. 3-43.
-----If You re an Egalitarian, How Come You re So Rich?, Harvard
University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
----- „Facts and Principles”, Philosophy Public Affairs 31, 3
(2003), pp. 211-245.
----- Rescuing Justice and Equality, Harvard University Press,
Cambridge, 2008.
-----Why Not Socialism?, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2009.
----- „How to Do Political Philosophy”, în G A. Cohen, On the
Currency of Egalitarian Justice, and Other Essays in
218
Referinţe bibliografice
Political Philosophy, (ed.) Michael Otsuka, Princeton
University Press, Princeton, 2011, pp. 225-235,
-----„Rescuing Justice from Constructivism and Equality from the
Basic Structure Restriction”, în G. A, Cohen, On the
Currency of Egalitarian Justice, and Other Essays in
Political Philosophy, (ed.) Michael Otsuka, Princeton
University Press, Princeton, 2011, pp. 336-254.
Cohen, Joshua, „For a Democratic Society”, in The Cambridge
Companion to Rawls, (ed.) Samuel Freeman, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, 2003, pp. 86-138.
-----„Truth and Public Reason”, în Philosophy Public Affairs 37, 1
(2009), pp. 2-42.
Copp, David, „Experiments, Intuitions, and Methodology in Moral
and Political Theory”, în Oxford Studies in Metaethics
Volume 7, (ed.) Russ Shafer-Landau, Oxford University
Press, Oxford, 2012, pp. 1-36.
Corlett, J. Angelo, (ed.), The Journal of Ethics 14, 3-4 (2010) ֊
Devoted to G A. Cohen.
Culp, Julian, „Two Conceptions of Ideal and Nonideal Theory”, în
Aracê - Direitos Humanos em Revista 2, 2 (2015), pp. 127-
153.
Culp, Julian şi Nicole Hassoun, „Ideal Moral Theory”, în
Encyclopedia of Global Justice, (ed.) Deen Chatterjee,
Springer, Dordrecht, 2011, pp. 521-523.
Cureton, Adam, „A Rawlsian Perspective on Justice for the Disabled”,
în Essays in Philosophy 9, 1 (2009),
http://commons.pacificu.edu/eip/vol9/iss 1 / 5/.
Dahl, Robert A. On Democracy. Yale University Press, New Heaven
Londra, 1998. Trad. rom. Despre democraţie, Editura
Institutul European, Iaşi, 2003.
Daniels, Norman, Just Health Care, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 1985.
----- Just Health: Meeting Health Needs Fairly, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, 2008.
219
IDEAL-NONIDEAL
de Maagt, Sem, „In Defence of Fact-Dependency”, în Canadian
Journal of Philosophy 44, 3-4 (2014), pp. 443-462
Diamond, Larry, Marc F. Plattner, Yun-han Chu şi Hung-mao Tien
(ed.), Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies. Themes
and Perspectives, The Johns Hopkins University Press,
Baltimore şi Londra, 1997. Trad. rom. Cum se consolidează
democraţia, Editura Polirom, Iaşi, 2004.
Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously, Harvard University Press,
Cambridge, 1978. Trad. rom. Drepturile la modul serios,
Editura ARC, Chişinău, 1998.
-----A Matter of Principle, Harvard University Press, Cambridge,
1985.
-----„Equality, Luck and Hierarchy”, în Philosophy Public Affairs
31,2(1993), pp. 190-198.
-----„Objectivity and Truth: You’d Better Believe It”, în Philosophy
Public Affairs 25, 2. (1996), pp. 87-139.
-----Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality, Harvard
University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
----- „Replies”, în Dworkin and His Critics, (ed.) Justine Burley,
Blackwell, Oxford, 2005, pp. 339-395.
-----Is Democracy Possible Here? Principles for a New Political
Debate, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2006.
-----Justice in Robes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2006.
Elkin, Stephen L., Reconstructing the Commercial Republic:
Constitutional Design after Madison, University of Chicago
Press, Chicago, 2006.
Elster, Jon, Local Justice, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1992.
Erman, Eva şi Niklas Möller, „Three Failed Chaiges Against Ideal
Theory”, în Social Theory Practice 39, 1 (2013), pp. 19-44.
-----„Political Legitimacy in the Real Normative World: The Priority
of Morality and the Autonomy of the Political”, în British
Journal of Political Science 45, 1 (2015), pp. 215-233.
-----„Why Political Realists Should Not Be Afraid of Moral Values”,
în Journal of Philosophical Research 40 (2015), pp. 459-464.
220
Referinţe bibliografice
Estlund, David, „The Survival of Egalitarian Justice in John Rawls’s
Political Liberalism”, in The Journal of Political Philosophy
4, 1 (1996), pp. 68-78.
----- „The Insularity of the Reasonable: Why Political Liberalism
Must Admit the Truth”, in Ethics 108, 2 (1998), pp. 252-275.
-----Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework, Princeton
University Press, Princeton, 2007.
-----„The Truth in Political Liberalism”, m Truth and Democracy,
(ed.) Jeremy Elkins §i Andrew Norris, University of
Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 2010, pp. 251-271.
-----„Human Nature and the Limits (If Any) of Political Philosophy”,
in Philosophy Public Affairs 39, 3 (2011), pp. 207-237.
-----„What Good Is It? - Unrealistic Political Theory and the Value of
Intellectual Work”, in Analyse Kritik 2 (2011), pp. 395-416.
-----„Utopophobia”, în Philosophy Public Affairs 42, 2 (2014), pp.
113-134.
----- „Reply to Wiens”, in European Journal of Political Theory
(2015), DOI: 10.1177/1474885115602369.
Estlund, David, (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy,
Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.
Farrelly, Colin, „Justice in Ideal Theory: A Refutation”, in Political
Studies 55, 4 (2007), pp. 1-21.
----- Justice, Democracy and Reasonable Agreements Palgrave
Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2007.
Feinberg, Joel, „Duty and Obligation in the Nonideal World”, in
Journal of Philosophy 70, 9 (1973), pp. 263-275.
-----Social Philosophy, Prentice-Hail, Englewood Cliffs, 1973.
Fleurbaey, Marc, „Equal Opportunity or Equal Social Outcome?” in
Economics Philosophy 11 (1995), pp. 25-55.
-----„Egalitarian Opportunities”, in Law and Philosophy 20 (2001),
pp. 499-530.
----- „Freedom with Forgiveness”, In Politics, Philosophy
Economics 4, 1 (2005), pp. 29-67.
Forcehimes, Andrew T. §i Robert B. Talisse, „Clarifying Cohen: A Response
to Jubb and Hall”, in Res Publica 19,4 (2013), pp. 371-379.
221
i
IDEAL-NONIDEAL
Foster, Sheila R., „Race and Ethnicity, Rawls, Race, and Reason”, în
Fordhan։ Law Review 75, 5 (2004) - Rawls and the Law, pp.
1715-1719.
Frankfurt, Harry G, „Equality as a Moral Ideal”, în Ethics 98, 1
(1987), pp. 21-43.
-----„Equality and Respect”, în Social Research 64 (1997), pp. 3-15.
-----„The Moral Irrelevance of Equality”, în Public Affairs Quarterly
14(2000), pp. 87-103.
-----On Inequality, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2015.
Fraser, Nancy, Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a
Globalizing World, Columbia University Press, New York,
2009.
Fraser, Nancy şi Axel Honneth, Redistribution or Recognition? A
Political-Philosophical Exchange, Verso, Londra -New
York, 2003. Trad. rom. Despre redistribuire şi recunoaştere.
O controversă politico-filosofică, Editura Tact, Cluj-Napoca,
2011.
Frederick, Danny, „Pro-Tanto versus . Absolute Rights”, în
Philosophical Forum 45, 4 (2014), pp. 375-394.
Freeman, Samuel, Justice and the Social Contract: Essays on
Rawlsian Political Philosophy, Oxford University Press,
New York, 2006.
----- „Frontiers of Justice: The Capabilities Approach vs.
Contractarianism”, în Texas Law Review 85 (2006), pp. 385-
480.
-----Rawls, Routledge, New York Londra, 2007.
----- „Constructivism, Facts, and Moral Justification”, în
Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy, (ed.) Thomas
Christiano şi John Christman, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester,
2009, pp. 41-60.
-----„Ideal Theory and the Justice of Institutions vs. Comprehensive
Outcomes”, în Rutgers Law Journal 43 (2012), pp. 169-210.
Freeman, Samuel, (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.
222
Referinţe bibliografice
Freyenhagen, Fabian. „Taking Reasonable Pluralism Seriously: An
Internal Critique of Political Liberalism”, in Politics,
Philosophy Economics 10, 3 (2011): 323-342.
Galston, William, „Realism and Moralism in Political Theory: The
Legacies of John Rawls”, in Reflections on Rawls: An
Assessment of His Legacy, (ed.) Shaun Young, Ashgate,
Aldershot, 2009, pp. 111-129.
-----, jtealism in Political Theory”, in European Journal of Political
Theory 9, 4 (2010), pp. 385-411.
Gaus, Gerald §i Fred D Agostino, (ed.), The Routledge Companion to
Social and Political Philosophy, Routledge, Londra New
York, 2012.
Geuss, Raymond, Philosophy and Real Politics, Princeton University
Press, Princeton, 2009.
Gheaus, Anca, „Gender Justice”, in Journal of Ethics Social
Philosophy 6, 1 (2012), pp. 1-24, http://www.jesp.org/
PDF/gender_justice_finalized.pdf.
-----„The Feasibility Constraint on the Concept of Justice”, in The
Philosophical Quarterly 63,252 (2013), pp. 445-464.
-----„Hikers in Flip-Flops. Luck Egalitarianism, Democratic Equality
and the Distribuenda of Justice”, in Journal of Applied
Philosophy (2016), DOI: 10.1111/japp.l2198,
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/10.1111/japp. 12198/full.
Gibson, Francisco García, „Utopias and Comparative Assessments of
Justice”, in Metaphilosophy 47, 1 (2016), pp. 92-107.
Gilabert, Pablo, „Global Justice and Poverty Relief in Nonideal
Circumstances”, in Social Justice: Ideal Theory, Nonideal
Circumstances, (ed.) Ingrid Robeyns ęi Adam Swift, Social
Theory and Practice 34, 3 (2008), pp. 411-438.
-----„Comparative Assessments of Justice, Political Feasibility, and
Ideal Theory”, in Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15, 1
(2011), pp. 39-56.
----- „Feasibility and Socialism”, in The Journal of Political
Philosophy 19, 1 (2011), pp. 52-63.
223
IDEAL-NONIDEAL
----- „Justice and Feasibility: A Dynamic Approach”, în curs de
apariţie în Political Utopias: Contemporary Debates, (ed.)
Kevin Valiier şi Michael Weber, Oxford University Press,
Oxford, 2017, http://philpapers.org/archive/GILJAF.pdf.
Gilabert, Pablo şi Holly Lawford-Smith, „Political Feasibility: A
Conceptual Exploration”, în Political Studies 60, 4 (2012),
pp. 809-825.
Gledhill, James, „Rawls and Realism”, în Social Theory and Practice
38, 1 (2012), pp. 55-82.
-----„In Defense of Transcendental Institutionalism”, în Philosophy
Social Criticism 40, 7 (2014), pp. 665-682.
Goodin, Robert E., „Political Ideals and Political Practice”, m British
Journal of Political Science 25 (1995), pp. 37-56.
Goya-Tocchetto, Daniela, „A Defense of Nonideal Theories of Justice”,
în Direito, Estado e Sociedade 47 (2015), pp. 64 -90.
Graham, Paul, Rawls, Oneworld, Oxford, 2006.
Gray, John, Two Faces of Liberalism, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2000.
Trad. rom. Cele două feţe ale liberalismului, Editura Polirom,
Iaşi, 2002.
Greene, Joshua D., „The Secret Joke of Kant’s Soul”, în Moral
Psychology; Voi 3: The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion,
Brain Disorders, and Development, (ed.) Walter Sinnott-
Armstrong, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2008, pp. 35-80.
Hall, Edward, „Political Realism and Fact-Sensitivity”, în Res Publica
19 (2013), pp. 173-181.
----- „The Limits of Bernard Williams’s Critique of Political
Moralism”, în Ethical Perspectives 20, 2 (2013), pp. 217-
243.
Hamlin, Alan şi Zofia Stemplowska, „Theory, Ideal Theory and the
Theory of Ideals”, în Political Studies Review 10, 1 (2012),
pp. 48-62.
Hampton, Jean, „Should Political Philosophy Be Done without
Metaphysics?”, în Ethics 99, 4 (1989), pp. 791-814.
224
Referinţe bibliografice
Hartley, Christie, „An Inclusive Contractualism: Obligation to the
Mentally Disabled”, în Disability and Disadvantage, (ed.)
Kimberly Brownlee şi Adam Cureton, Oxford University
Press, New York, 2009, pp 138-162.
-----„Justice for the Disabled: A Contractualist Approach”, în Journal
of Social Philosophy 40, 1 (2009), pp. 17-36.
Hendrix, Burke A., „Where Should We Expect Social Change in Non-
Ideal Theory?”, în Political Theory 41, 1 (2013), pp. 116-
143.
Holt, Justin P., „GA. Cohen on the Feasibility of Socialism”, în
Critique: Journal of Socialist Theory 40, 1 (2012), pp. 41-55.
Hoitug, Nils, Persons, Interests, and Justice, Oxford University Press,
Oxford, 2010.
Honig, Bonnie, Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics,
Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1993.
Honneth, Axel, The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of
Social Conflicts, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1995.
-----„Recognition or Redistribution? Changing Perspectives on the
Moral Order of Society”, în Theory, Culture Society 18, 2-
3(2001), pp. 43-55.
-----„Recognition and Justice. Outline of a Plural Theory of Justice”,
în Acta Sociologica 47, 4 (2004), pp. 351-364.
Huntington, Samuel P., The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late
Twentieth Century, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman şi
Londra, 1991.
Huzum, Eugen, „Can Luck Egalitarianism be Really Saved by Value
Pluralism?”, în Studia Philosophia 56, 2 (2011), pp. 41-52.
-----„Critica teoriilor ideal(ist)e ale dreptăţii sociale. Cazul Amartya
Sen”, în Symposion IX, 2 (2011), pp. 415-428.
----- „Dreptatea socială”, în Concepte şi teorii social-politice,
(coord.) Eugen Huzum, Editura Institutul European, Iaşi,
2011, pp. 59-83.
-----„Justice and (the Limits of) other Social Values. A Defense of the
Primacy of Justice”, în Symposion IX, 1/17 (2011), pp. 165-
225
IDEAL-NONIDEAL
172. Retipărit în Limits of Knowledge Society, (ed.) Irina
Frasin şi Codrin Dinu Vasiliu, Editura Institutul European,
Iaşi, 2012, pp. 141-152.
----- „Is the Pursuit of Truth the Primary Task of a Political
Philosopher?”, în European Journal of Science and Theology
8,3(2012), pp. 233-240.
----- „Problema fezabilităţii în teoria dreptăţii sociale”, în Sfera
Politicii 5/171 (2012), pp. 124-135.
-----„Despre baza principiului egalităţii umane fundamentale”, în
Transilvania 3 (2013), pp. 1-7.
-----„Egalitarianismul”, în Teorii şi ideologii politice, (coord.) Eugen
Huzum, Editura Institutul European, Iaşi, 2013, pp. 49-88.
—— In afara eticii? Filosofia politică şi principiile morale, Editura
Institutul European, Iaşi, 2016.
Huzum, Loredana, Dreptate distributivă şi sănătate în filosofia
contemporană, Editura Institutul European, Iaşi, 2011.
Ismael, Jennan, „A Philosopher of Science Looks at Idealization in
Political Theory”, în curs de apariţie în Social Philosophy
and Policy, 2017, http://www.jenanni.com/papers/Aphiloso
pherofScienceLooksatIdealizationinPoliticalTheory.pdf.
Johannsen, Kyle, „Explanation and Justification: Understanding the
Functions of Fact-Insensitive Principles”, în Socialist
Studies/Études socialistes 11,1 (2016), pp. 174-186.
----- „On the Theoretical Significance of G A. Cohen’s Fact-
Insensitivity Thesis”, în Res Publica (2016), DOI: 10.1007/
si 1158-016-9334-1.
Jubb, Robert, „Logical and Epistemic Foundationalism about
Grounding: The Triviality of Facts and Principles”, în Res
Publica 15 (2009), pp. 337-353.
-----„The Tragedies of Non-ideal Theory”, în European Journal of
Political Theory 11,3 (2012), pp. 229-246.
-----„Playing Kant at the Court of King Arthur”, în Political Studies
63, 4 (2015), pp. 919-934.
-----„Realism in Analytical Political Theory: A How-To Guide”, în
curs de apariţie în Methods in Analytical Political Theory,
226
■
Referinţe bibliografice
(ed.) Adrian Blau. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
2016, https://reading.academia.edu/RobertJubb.
Jubb, Robert şi Enzo Rossi, „Political Norms and Moral Values”, în
Journal of Philosophical Research 40 (2015), pp. 455-458.
----- „Why Moralists Should Be Afraid of Political Values: A
Rejoinder”, în Journal of Philosophical Research 40 (2015),
pp. 465-468.
Kahneman, Daniel şi Amos Tversky, „Choices, Values, and Frames”,
in American Psychologist 39 (1984), pp. 341-350.
Kamm, F. M., „Sen on Justice and Rights: A Review Essay”, în
Philosophy Public Affairs 39, 1 (2011), pp. 82-104.
Kaufman, Alexander (ed.), Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and
Problems, Routledge, Londra, 2005.
-----Distributive Justice and Access to Advantage: G. A. Cohen s
Egalitarianism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
2014.
Kittay, Eva Feder, Love s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and
Dependency, Routledge, New York, 1999.
-----„When Caring Is Just and Justice Is Caring: Justice and Mental
Retardation”, în Public Culture 13 (2001), pp. 557-579.
Knight, Jack şi James Johnson, The Priority of Democracy: Political
Consequences of Pragmatism, Princeton University Press,
Princeton, 2014.
Kofman, Daniel, „How Insensitive: Principles, Facts and Normative
Grounds in Cohen’s Critique of Rawls”, în Socialist Studies /
Etudes socialistes 8, 1 (2012), pp. 246-266.
Korsgaard, Christine M., Creating the Kingdom of Ends, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, 1996.
Kurtulmuş, A. Faik, „Rawls and Cohen on Facts and Principles”, în
Utilitas 21 (2009), pp. 489-505.
Kymlicka, Will, Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction,
ediţia a Il-a, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002.
Larmore, Charles, „What Is Political Philosophy?”, în Journal of
Moral Philosophy 10 (2013), pp. 276-306.
227
IDEAL-NONIDEAL
Laurence, Ben, „Constructivism, Strict Compliance, and Realistic
Utopianism”, în curs de apariţie în Philosophy and
Phenomenological Research (2016), http ¡//philosophy, uchica
go.edu/faculty/files/laurence/Constructivism%20Strict%20C
ompliance%20and%20Realistic%20Utopia%20FINAL.pdf.
Lawford-Smith, Holly, „Ideal Theory — A Reply to Valentini”, în
Journal of Political Philosophy 18, 3 (2010), pp. 357-368.
-----„Non-Ideal Accessibility”, în Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
16, 3 (2013), pp. 653-669.
----- „Understanding Political Feasibility”, în Journal of Political
Philosophy 21, 3 (2013), pp. 243-259.
Levy, Jacob T., „There’s No Such Thing as Ideal Theory”, în curs de
apariţie în Social Philosophy and Policy, 2017,
https://www.academia.edu/6716365/There_Is_No_Such_Thing_
As_Ideal_Theory.
Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper, Luck Egalitarianism, Bloomsbury,
Londra New York, 2016.
List, Christian şi Laura Valentini, „The Methodology of Political
Theory”, în The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical
Methodology, (ed.) Herman Cappelen, Tamar Szabõ Gendler
şi John Hawthorne, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2016,
pp. 525-553.
Lister, Andrew, „Justice as Fairness and Reciprocity”, în Analyse
Kritik 33, 1 (2011), pp. 93-112.
----- „Fact-Sensitivity and the ‘Defining-Down’ Objection”, in Res
Publica (2016), DOI: 10.1007/sl 1158-016-9332-3.
Macleod, Colin M., „Primary Goods, Capabilities, and Children”, în
Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities, (ed.)
Harry Brighouse şi Ingrid Robeyns, Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, 2010, pp. 174-192.
Mandle, Jon, Rawls s A Theory of Justice: An Introduction, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, 2009.
Mason, Andrew, „Just Constraints”, in British Journal of Political
Science 34, 2 (2004), pp. 251-268.
228
I
Referinţe bibliografice
-----Levelling the Playing Field: The Idea of Equal Opportunity and
its Place in Egalitarian Thought, Oxford University Press,
Oxford, 2006.
----- „Rawlsian Theory and the Circumstances of Politics”, în
Political Theory 38, 5 (2010), pp. 658-683.
-----„Legitimacy and Disagreement: A Reply to Sleat”, în Political
Theory 40, 5 (2012), pp. 657-662.
-----„What Is the Point of Justice?”, în Utilitas 24, 4 (2012), pp. 525-
547.
McCarthy, Thomas, „Political Philosophy and Racial Injustice: From
Normative to Critical Theory”, în Pragmatism, Critique,
Judgment, (ed.) Seyla Benhabib şi Nancy Fraser, MIT Press,
Cambridge, 2004, pp. 149-170.
Miller, David, „Distributive Justice: What the People Think”, în Ethics
102 (1992), pp. 555-593. Retipărit în David Miller,
Principles of Social Justice, Harvard University Press,
Cambridge, 1999, pp. 61-92.
----- „Political Philosophy for Earthlings”, în Political Theory:
Methods and Approaches, (ed.) David Leopold şi Marc
Stears, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008, pp. 29-48.
Retipărit în David Miller, Justice for Earthlings. Essays in
Political Philosophy, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 2013, pp. 16-39.
-----„Taking up the Slack? Responsibility and Justice in Situations of
Partial Compliance”, în Responsibility and Distributive
Justice, (ed.) Zofia Stemplowska şi Carl Knight, Oxford
University Press, Oxford, 2011, pp. 230-245. Retipărit în
David Miller, Justice for Earthlings, pp. 206-227.
Mills, Charles W., „Ideal Theory as Ideology”, in Hypatia 20, 3
(2005), pp. 165-184.
------ „Racial Liberalism”, în PMLA 123, 5, Special Issue on
Comparative Racialization (2008), pp. 1380-1397.
-----„Response B”, în Journal of Political Ideologies 13, 3 (2008),
pp. 255-262.
229
IDEAL-NONIDEAL
-----„Rawls on Race/Race in Rawls”, în The Southern Journal of
Philosophy XLVII (2009), pp. 161-184.
Mulgan, Tim, Ethics for a Broken World: Imagining Philosophy after
Catastrophe, Acumen, Durham, 2011.
Murphy, Liam B. „Institutions and the Demands of Justice”, în
Philosophy Public Affairs, 27, 4 (1998), pp. 251-291.
-----Moral Demands in Nonideal Theory, Oxford University Press,
Oxford, 2000.
Nagel, Thomas, Other Minds: Critical Essays 1969-1994, Oxford
University Press, New York, 1995.
Newey, Glen, After Politics: The Rejection of Politics in Contemporary
Liberal Philosophy, Palgrave, New York, 2001.
-----„Two Dogmas of Liberalism”, în European Journal of Political
Theory 9 (2010), pp. 449-465.
Nielsen, Kai, „Rescuing Political Theory From Fact-Insensitivity”, în
Socialist Studies /Etudes socialistes 8,1 (2012), pp. 216-245.
North, Richard, „Principles as Guides: The Action-Guiding Role of
Justice in Politics”, în The Journal of Politics (2016), DOI:
10.1086/687286.
Nozick, Robert, Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Blackwell, Oxford
Cambridge, 1974. Trad. rom. Anarhie, stat şi utopie, Editura
Humanitás, Bucureşti, 1997.
Nussbaum, Martha C., Women and Human Development: The
Capabilities Approach, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 2000.
----- „Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social
Justice”, în Feminist Economics 9,2/3 (2003), pp. 33-59.
-----„Rawls and Feminism”, în The Cambridge Companion to Rawls,
(ed.) Samuel Freeman, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 2003, pp. 488-520.
-----„Beyond the Social Contract: Toward Global Justice,” in The
Tanner Lectures on Human Values 24, (ed.) Grethe B.
Peterson, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, 2004, pp.
413-507.
230
I
Referinţe bibliografice
----- Frontiers of Justice: Disability; Nationality; Species
Membership, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2006.
-----„Replies”, in The Journal of Ethics 10, 4 (2006), pp. 463-506.
----- Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach,
Harvard University Press, Harvard, 2011.
Nussbaum, Martha şi Amartya Sen (ed.), The Quality of Life,
Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993.
O’Neill, Martin şi Thad Williamson, Property-Owning Democracy:
Rawls and Beyond, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, 2012.
O’Neill, Onora, „Abstraction, Idealization and Ideology in Ethics”, in
Moral Philosophy and Contemporary Problems, (ed.) J. D. G.
Evans, Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series 22
(1987), pp. 55-69.
-----„Constructivisms in Ethics”, In Proceedings of the Aristotelian
Society, New Series 89 (1988-1989), pp. 1-17. Retipărit în
Onora O’Neill, Constructions of Reason: Explorations of
Kant s Practical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 1989, pp. 206-218.
-----Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical
Reasoning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.
Okin, Susan Möller, Justice, Gender, and the Family, Basic Books,
New York, 1989.
----- „Political Liberalism, Justice, and Gender”, în Ethics 105, 1
(1994), pp. 23-43.
----- „Gender, Justice and Gender: An Unfinished Debate”, în
Fordham Law Review 75, 5 (2004) - Rawls and the Law, pp.
1537-1567.
Parfit, Derek, „Equality or Priority?”, în The Ideal of Equality, (ed.)
Matthew Clayton şi Andrew Williams, Macmillan, Londra,
2000, pp. 81-125.
-----„Another Defence of the Priority View”, în Utilitas 24, 3 (2012)
— Prioritarianism, pp 399-440.
Pätemän, Carole, The Sexual Contract, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1988.
Pätemän, Carole şi Charles Mills, Contract and Domination, Polity
Press, Cambridge, 2007.
231
IDEAL-NONIDEAL
Petrinovich, Lewis şi Patricia O’Neill, „Influence of Wording and
Framing Effects on Moral Intuitions”, în Ethology
Sociobiology 17, 3 (1996), pp. 145-171.
Phillips, Anne, „Egalitarians and the Market: Dangerous Ideals”, în
Social Justice: Ideal Theory; Nonideal Circumstances, (ed.)
Ingrid Robeyns şi Adam Swift, Social Theory and Practice
34, 3 (2008), pp. 439-462.
Phillips, Michael, „Reflections on the Transition from Ideal to Non-
Ideal Theory”, în Nous 19 (1985), pp. 551-570.
Pogge, Thomas W., Realizing Rawls, Cornell University Press, Ithaca
şi Londra, 1989.
-----„On the Site of Distributive Justice: Reflections on Cohen and
Murphy”, în Philosophy Public Affairs 29 (2000), pp. 137-169.
-----John Rawls. His Life and Theory of Justice, Oxford University
Press, Oxford, 2007.
----- „Cohen to the Rescue!”, în Ratio 21 (2008), pp. 454-475.
Retipărit în Justice, Equality; and Constructivism: Essays on
G.A. Cohen s Rescuing Justice and Equality, (ed.) Brian
Feltham, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, 2009, pp. 88-109.
Powers, Madison şi Ruth Faden, Social Justice: The Moral
Foundations of Public Health and Health Policy, Oxford
University Press, New York, 2006.
Quong, Jonathan, Liberalism without Perfection, Oxford University
Press, New York, 2011.
Räikkä, Juha, „The Feasibility Condition in Political Theory”, în
Journal of Political Philosophy 6, 1 (1998), pp. 27-40.
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice, Belknap Press, Cambridge, 1971.
-----„Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory”, în The Journal of
Philosophy 77, 9 (1980), pp. 515-572.
-----„The Basic Liberties and Their Priority”, în The Tanner Lectures
on Human Values, (ed.) Sterling M. McMurrin, University of
Utah Press, Salt Lake City, 1982, pp. 3-87.
-----„Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical”, în Philosophy
Public Affairs 14,3 (1985), pp. 223-251.
232
■
Referinţe bibliografice
-----Political Liberalism, Columbia University Press, New York,
1996.
-----A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition, Belknap Press, Cambridge,
1999. Trad, rom. O teorie a dreptăţii, Editura Universităţii
„Alexandru loan Cuza”, Iaşi, 2012.
----- Collected Papers, (ed.) Samuel Freeman, Harvard University
Press, Cambridge, 1999.
-----The Law of Peoples with ”The Idea of Public Reason Revisited”,
Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1999.
-----Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Belknap Press, Cambridge,
2001.
-----Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy, (ed.) Samuel
Freeman, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2007.
Raz, Joseph, „Facing Diversity: The Case of Epistemic Abstinence”,
în Philosophy Public Affairs 19, 1 (1990), pp. 3-46.
Richardson, Henry S., „Rawlsian Social-Contract Theory and the
Severely Disabled”, în The Journal of Ethics 10, 4 (2006),
pp. 419-462.
Robeyns, Ingrid, „When Will Society Be Gender Just?”, în The Future
of Gender, (ed.) Jude Browne, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 2007, pp. 54-74.
-----„Ideal Theory in Theory and Practice”, în Social Justice: Ideal
Theory; Nonideal Circumstances, (ed.) Ingrid Robeyns şi
Adam Swift, Social Theory and Practice 34, 3 (2008), pp.
341-362.
----- „Are Transcendental Theories of Justice Redundant?”, în
Journal of Economic Methodology 19, 2 (2012), pp. 159-163.
Roemer, John E., Equality of Opportunity, Harvard University Press,
Cambridge, 1998.
Ronzoni, Miriam şi Zofia Stemplowska, (ed.), G.A. Cohen and
Socialism — Politics, Philosophy Economics 13, 2 (2014).
Ronzoni, Miriam şi Laura Valentini, „On the Meta-Ethical Status of
Constructivism: Reflections on G.A. Cohen s ‘Facts and
Principles’”, în Politics, Philosophy Economics 7, 4
(2008), pp. 403-422.
233
IDEAL-NONIDEAL
Rossi, Enzo, „Justice, Legitimacy and (Normative) Authority for
Political Realists”, in Critical Review of International Social
and Political Philosophy 15, 2 (2012), pp. 149-164.
-----„Facts, Principles, and (Real) Politics”, in Ethical Theory and
Moral Practice 19, 2 (2016), pp. 505-520.
Sangiovanni, Andrea, „Normative Political Theory: A Flight from
Reality?”, in Political Thought and International Relations:
Variations on a Realist Theme, (ed.) Duncan Bell, Oxford
University Press, Oxford, 2009, pp. 219-239.
Schapiro, Tamar, „Compliance, Complicity, and the Nature of
Nonideal Conditions”, in Journal of Philosophy 100, 7
(2003), pp. 329-355.
Schaub, Jörg, „The Incompleteness of Ideal Theory”, in Res Publica
20 (2014), pp. 413-439.
Scheffler, Samuel, „What is Egalitarianism?”, in Philosophy Public
Affairs 31 (2003), pp. 5-39.
Schemmel, Christian §i Stefan Gosepath, (ed.), Socio-Economic
Justice: Beyond The Welfare State? — Journal of Applied
Philosophy 32, 4 (2015).
Schmidtz, David, „Nonideal Theory: What It Is and What It Needs to
Be”, in Ethics 121 (2011), pp. 772-796.
Schramme, Thomas, „On the Relationship between Political
Philosophy and Empirical Sciences”, in Analyse Kritik 30
(2008), pp. 613-626.
Schwartzman, Lisa, Challenging Liberalism: Feminism as Political
Critique, Pennsylvania State University Press, University
Park, 2006.
----- „Action-Guidance, Oppression, and Nonideal Theory”, in
Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 2, 1 (2016), Article 4,
http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/fpq/vol2/iss 1 /4.
Segall, Shlomi, Health, Luck, and Justice, Princeton University Press,
Princeton, 2009.
Sen, Amartya, „Equality of What?” in The Tanner Lectures on Human
Values, (ed.) Sterling M. McMurrin, University of Utah
Press, Salt Lake City, 1980, pp. 197-220.
234
Referinţe bibliografice
----- The Standard of Living, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 1987.
-----Inequality Reexamined, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1992.
-----Development as Freedom, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 2000.
Trad, rom, Dezvoltarea ca libertate, Editura Economica,
Bucure§ti, 2004.
----- „Capabilities, Lists and Public Reasons: Continuing the
Conversation”, in Feminist Economics 10, 3 (2004), pp. 77-80.
-----„What Do We Want from a Theory of Justice?”, in Journal of
Philosophy 103 (2006), pp. 215-238.
-----The Idea of Justice, Belknap Press, Cambridge, 2009.
Shapiro, Ian, Democratic Justice, Yale University Press, New Haven,
2001.
Shelby, Tommie, „Race and Ethnicity, Race and Social Justice:
Rawlsian Considerations”, in Fordham Law Review 75, 5
(2004) - Rawls and the Law, pp. 1697-1714.
Sher, George, Approximate Justice. Studies in Non-Ideal Theory,
Rowman Littlefield, Lanham, 1997.
Sidgwick, Henry, The Methods of Ethics, University of Chicago Press,
Chicago, 1962 (ed. orig. 1874).
Simmons, A. John, „Ideal and Nonideal Theory”, in Philosophy
Public Affairs 38, 1 (2010), pp. 5-36.
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, „Framing Moral Intuitions”, in Moral
Psychology; Vol 2: The Cognitive Science of Morality:
Intuition and Diversity, (ed.) Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, MIT
Press, Cambridge, 2008, pp, 47-76.
Sleat, Matt, „Legitimacy in a Non-Ideal Key: A Critical Response to
Andrew Mason”, in Political Theory 40, 5 (2012), pp. 650-
656.
-----„Realism, Liberalism and Non-ideal Theory Or, Are there Two
Ways to Do Realistic Political Theory?”, in Political Studies
(2014), DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.12152.
Stark, Cynthia A., „How to Include the Severely Disabled in a
Contractarian Theory of Justice”, in Journal of Political
Philosophy 15, 2 (2007), pp. 127-145.
235
IDEAL-NONIDEAL
-----„Contractariansm and Cooperation”, în Politics, Philosophy
Economics 8, 1 (2009), pp. 73-99.
-----„Respecting Human Dignity: Contract Versus Capabilities”, în
Metaphilosophy 40, 3-4 (2009), pp. 366-381. Retipărit în
Cognitive Disability and Its Challenge to Moral Philosophy,
(ed.) Eva Feder Kittay şi Licia Carlson, Wiley-Blackwell,
Malden, 2010, pp. 111-126.
Stemplowska, Zofia, „What’s Ideal about Ideal Theory”, în Social
Justice: Ideal Theory, Nonideal Circumstances, (ed.) Ingrid
Robeyns şi Adam Swift, Social Theory and Practice 34, 3
(2008), pp. 319-340.
----- „Doing More than One’s Fair Share”, în Critical Review of
International Social and Political Philosophy 19, 5 (2016),
pp. 591-608.
Stemplowska, Zofia şi Adam Swift, „Rawls on Ideal and Nonideal
Theory”, în A Companion to Rawls, (ed.) Jon Mandle şi David
A. Reidy, Wiley-Blackwel, Chichester, 2014, pp. 112-127.
Swift, Adam, „Public Opinion and Political Philosophy: The Relation
between Social-Scientific and Philosophical Analyses of
Distributive Justice”, în Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
2,4 (1999), pp 337-363.
-----„Social Justice: Why Does It Matter What the People Think?”, m
Forms of Justice: Critical Perspectives on David Miller s
Political Philosophy, (ed.) Daniel Bell şi Avner de-Shalit,
Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, 2003, pp. 13-28.
—— „Comment on Contract and Domination by Carole Pateman and
Charles W. Mills”, în Journal of Political Ideologies 13, 3
(2008), pp. 236-239.
-----„The Value of Philosophy in Nonideal Circumstances”, în Social
Justice: Ideal Theory; Nonideal Circumstances, (ed.) Ingrid
Robeyns şi Adam Swift, Social Theory and Practice 34, 3
(2008), pp. 363-387.
Swift, Adam, Gordon Marshall, Carole Burgoyne şi David Routh,
„Social Justice: Why Does It Matter What the People
236
Referinţe bibliografice
Think?”, in Social Justice and Political Change. Public
Opinion in Capitalist and Post-Communist States, (ed.),
James R. Kluegel, David S. Mason Bemd Wegener, Aldine
De Gruyter, New York, 1995, pp. 15-48.
Swift, Adam §i Stuart White, „Political Theory, Social Science, and
Real Politics”, in Political Theory. Methods and Approaches,
(ed.) David Leopold §i Marc Stears, Oxford University Press,
Oxford, 2008, pp. 49-69.
Tan, Kok-Chor, Justice, Institutions and Luck: The Site, Ground, and
Scope of Equality, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.
Taylor, Robert S., „Rawlsian Affirmative Action”, in Ethics 119
(2009), pp. 476-506.
-----Reconstructing Rawls: The Kantian Foundations of Justice as
Fairness, Pennsylvania State University Press, University
Park, 2011.
Temkin, Larry S., Inequality, Oxford University Press, New York,
1993.
----- „Justice, Equality, Fairness, Desert, Rights, Free Will,
Responsibility, and Luck”, in Responsibility and Distributive
Justice, ed. Carl Knight $i Zofia Stemplowska, Oxford
University Press, Oxford, 2011, pp. 51-76.
Thomas, Alan, „Sen on Rawls’s ‘Transcendental Institutionalism’: An
Analysis and Critique”, in European Journal of Political
Theory 13, 3 (2014), pp. 241-263.
----- „Rawls and Political Realism: Realistic Utopianism or
Judgement in Bad Faith?”, in European Journal of Political
Theory (2015), DOI: 10.1177/1474885115578970.
Thomas, Alan ęi Thad Williamson, (ed.), Property-Owning
Democracy - The Good Society 21,1 (2012).
Tomasi, John, Liberalism Beyond Justice: Citizens, Society, and the
Boundaries of Political Theory, Princeton University Press,
Princeton, 2001.
Tomlin, Patrick, „Can I be a Luck Egalitarian and a Rawlsian?”, in
Ethical Perspectives 19, 3 (2012), pp. 371-397.
237
IDEAL-NONIDEAL
Uberti, Luca Jacopo, „Good and Bad Idealizations in Political
Theory”, in Theoria 80 (2014), pp. 205-231.
Valentini, Laura, „On the Apparent Paradox of Ideal Theoiy”, in
Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2009), pp. 332-355.
-----„Ideal vs. Non-ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map”, in Philosophy
Compass 7, 9 (2012), pp. 654-664.
-----„Justice, Disagreement and Democracy”, in British Journal of
Political Science 43, 1 (2013), pp. 177-199.
Van Schoelandt, Chad, „Markets, Community, and Pluralism”, in The
Philosophical Quarterly 64, 254 (2014), pp. 144-151.
Venkatapuram, Sridhar, Health Justice. An Argument from the
Capabilities Approach, Polity, Cambridge, 2011.
Vrousalis, Nicholas, The Political Philosophy ofGA. Cohen: Back to
Socialist Basics, Bloomsbury, Londra, 2015.
Waldron, Jeremy, „What Plato Would Allow”, in Nomos 37 (1995) ֊
Theory and Practice, (ed.) Judith Wagner Decew §i Ian
Shapiro, pp. 138-178.
-----Law and Disagreement, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999.
-----„Political Political Theory: An Inaugural Lecture”, in Journal of
Political Philosophy 21, 1 (2013), pp. 1-23.
Walzer, Michael, Spheres of Justice. A Defense of Pluralism and
Equality, Basic Books, New York, 1983.
Weithman, Paul, „John Rawls and the Task of Political Philosophy”,
in The Review of Politics 71 (2009), pp. 113-125.
Wiens, David, „Prescribing Institutions Without Ideal Theory”, in
Journal of Political Philosophy 20, 1 (2012), pp. 45-70.
-----„‘Going Evaluative’ to Save Justice ffom Feasibility — A Pyrrhic
Victory”, in The Philosophical Quarterly 64, 255 (2014), pp.
301-307.
-----, Against Ideal Guidance”, in Journal of Politics 77, 2 (2015),
pp. 433-446.
----- „Motivational Limitations on the Demands of Justice”, in
European Journal of Political Theory 15, 3 (2016), pp. 333-
352.
238
Referinţe bibliografice
Williams, Andrew, „Justice, Incentives and Constructivism”, în Ratio
21,4 (2008), pp. 476-493. Retipărit în Justice, Equality; and
Constructivism: Essays on GA. Cohen’s Rescuing Justice and
Equality, (ed.) Brian Feltham, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester,
2009, pp. 110-126.
Williams, Bernard, In the Beginning Was the Deed, Princeton
University Press, Princeton, 2005.
Williamson, Thad şi Martin O’Neill, „Property-Owning Democracy
and the Demands of Justice”, Center for Comparative and
International Studies, ETH Zürich and University of Zürich,
în Living Reviews in Democracy (2009), http://www.Hvmg
reviews.org/lrd-2009-5.
Williamson, Timothy, The Philosophy of Philosophy, Blackwell,
Malden, 2007.
Wong, Sophia Isako, „Duties of Justice to Citizens with Cognitive
Disabilities”, în Metaphilosophy 40, 3-4 (2009), pp. 382-401.
Retipărit în Cognitive Disability and Its Challenge to Moral
Philosophy, (ed.) Eva Feder Kittay şi Licia Carlson, Wiley-
Blackwell, Malden, 2010, pp. 127-146.
Young, Iris Marion, Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton
University Press, Princeton, 1991.
Ypi, Lea, „On the Confusion between Ideal and Non-ideal in Recent
Debates on Global Justice”, în Political Studies 58 (2010),
pp. 536-555.
----- „Facts, Principles and the Third Man”, în Socialist Studies /
Études socialistes 8, 1 (2012), pp. 196-215. Retipărit în
Distributive Justice and Access to Advantage: G. A. Cohen s
Egalitarianism, (ed.) Alexander Kaufman, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, 2014, pp. 95-115.
Zucker, Ross, Democratic Distributive Justice, Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, 2001.
239
I
Indice de autori
A
Anderson, Elizabeth, 50, 68, 112,
145, 156, 159, 161, 174, 192,
204.215
Archard, David, 42, 97, 215
Archer, Alfred, 14,215
Aristotel, 150, 215
Ameson, Richard J., 13, 117,
119-122, 137, 146-147, 151,
155, 166, 192,215
Arvan, Marcus, 63-67, 88, 161,
216
Audard, Catherine, 35, 97, 216
Đ
Baderin, Alice, 113, 216
Baier, Annette, 49, 164, 216
Baptista, António, 48, 216
Barber, Benjamin, 106-109, 111,
216
Barry, Brian, 17, 19, 53, 55, 97,
199.216
Basu, Kaushik, 58, 216
Bell, Duncan, 55, 196, 234, 236
Benhabib, Seyla, 44, 229
Bertram, Chris, 20-21, 216
Blau, Adrian, 73, 227
Boettcher, James, 45, 172, 188,
217
Bojer, Hilde, 97, 217
Boot, Martijn, 55,217
Bou-Habib, Paul, 97, 217
Brandt, Richard, 88, 217
Brennan, Geoffrey, 79, 217
Brennan, Jason, 13, 217
Brennan, Samantha, 96, 217
Brighouse, Harry, 58, 97, 141,
217-218, 228
Browne, Jude, 182, 233
Brownlee, Kimberly, 98,225
Buchanan, Allen, 42, 97, 182,
218
Burgoyne, Carole, 196, 236
C
Cappelen, Herman, 11, 228
Carey, Brian, 188, 190, 218
Carlson, Licia, 236, 239
Casal, Paula, 147, 151,218
Chahboun, Naima, 60, 69, 218
Chatteijee, Deen, 187, 219
Cheneval, Francis, 48, 218
Chu, Yun-han, 160, 220
Claassen, Rutger, 58, 218
241
IDEAL-NONIDEAL
Cobum, Elaine, 13, 218
Cohen, G A., 12-16, 18, 68, 87,
103, 111, 116-119, 121-122,
125, 128-149, 151, 155, 161,
166, 168, 192, 210-212, 215-
216, 218-219, 222, 225-227,
231,234, 238-239
Cohen, Joshua, 111, 125,219
Copp, David, 197,219
Corlett, J. Angelo, 13, 219
Culp, Julian, 117, 187,219
Cureton, Adam, 98, 219, 225
D
D’Agostino, Fred, 14, 223
Dahl, Robert A., 160,219
Daniels, Norman, 42-43, 182,
219
Davion, Victoria, 97, 217
de Maagt, Sem, 142, 220
de-Shalit, Avner, 196,236
Diamond, Larry, 160, 220
Dworkin, Ronald, 15, 53, 115,
153-156, 160, 192, 199, 204,
220
E
Elkin, Stephen L., 112, 220
Elkins, Jeremy, 125, 221
Elster, Jon, 102, 220
Erman, Eva, 11, 113, 185,220
Estlund, David, 10, 15, 87,
116, 125, 129, 141, 166, 221
Evans, J. D. G, 172, 231
F
Faden, Ruth, 42, 182, 232
Farrelly, Colin, 49, 79, 141, 170-
171, 174, 189,211,221
Feinberg, Joel, 88, 130, 221
Fleurbaey, Marc, 145, 221
Forcehimes, Andrew T., 142, 221
Foster, Sheila R., 45,222
Frankfurt, Harry G, 147-148,
222
Fraser, Nancy, 44, 156-158, 161,
192, 204, 222, 229
Frederick, Danny, 222
Freeman, Samuel, 35, 39, 45, 47,
51-52, 56-57, 97, 142, 167,
219, 222-223, 230, 233
Freyenhagen, Fabian, 73, 113,
223
G
Galston, William, 72, 79, 85,
106-109, 111, 142,211,223
Gaus, Gerald, 10, 14, 223
Gendler, Tamar Szabó, 11, 228
Geuss, Raymond, 29-30, 72-73,
223
Gheaus, Anca, 12, 141, 145, 182,
223
Gibson, Francisco García, 54,
223
Gilabert, Pablo, 13, 53, 139, 183-
184, 190, 223, 224
Gledhili, James, 51, 85, 224
Goodin, Robert E., 11,224
242
I
indice de autori
Gosepath, Stefan, 48, 234
Goya-Tocchetto, Daniela, 188,
194-195, 224
Graham, Paul, 35, 224
Gray, John, 106-109, 111, 224
Greene, Joshua D., 197, 224
H
Hall, Edward, 85, 142, 224
Hamlin, Alan, 54, 169, 203-204,
206-207, 224
Hampton, Jean, 124, 224
Hartley, Christie, 98, 225
Hassoun, Nicole, 187, 219
Hawthome, John, 11, 228
Hendrix, Burke A., 50, 225
Holt, Justin P., 13, 225
Holtug, Nils, 152, 225
Honig, Bonnie, 106-109, 111,
225
Honneth, Axel, 156-158, 161,
222, 225
Huntington, Samuel P., 160, 225
Huzum, Loredana, 27, 43, 182,
226
I
Ismael, Jennan, 81, 226
J
Jackson, Frank, 79, 217
Johannsen, Kyle, 138, 142, 226
Johnson, James, 39, 227
Jubb, Robert, 54, 67-69, 72-73,
85, 112-113, 142, 185-187,
189, 202, 222, 226-227
K
Kahneman, Daniel, 197, 227
Kamm, F. M., 57, 227
Kanbur, Ravi, 58, 216
Kaufman, Alexander, 13, 58,
147,215-216, 227, 239
Kittay, Eva Feder, 97, 227, 236,
239
Kluegel, James R., 196, 237
Knight, Carl, 88, 121, 229,237
Knight, Jack, 39, 227
Kofman, Daniel, 142, 227
Korsgaard, Christine M., 93, 227
Kurtulmuş, A. Faik, 142, 227
Kymlicka, Will, 14, 227
L
Larmore, Charles, 142, 227
Laszlo, Christoph, 48, 218
Laurence, Ben, 176-180, 187, 228
Lawford-Smith, Holly, 11, 88,
139, 172, 190, 224, 228
Leopold, David, 40, 141, 229, 237
Levy, Jacob T., 79, 203-207, 228
Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper, 15,228
List, Christian, 11, 228
Lister, Andrew, 98, 141, 228
M
Macleod, Colin M., 228
243
IDEAL-NONIDEAL
Mandie, Jon, 35, 48, 91, 98, 174,
229, 236
Marshall, Gordon, 196,236
Mason, Andrew, 75-76, 87, 129-
130, 132, 139-141, 143, 145,
147, 149, 172, 196, 228,235
Mason, David S., 186, 237
Matthews, Gareth, 96, 217
McCarthy, Thomas, 44, 229
McMurrin, Sterling M., 57, 92,
232, 234
Merrill, Roberto, 48, 216
Miller, David, 88-89, 141, 195-
196, 229, 237
Mills, Charles W., 40-41, 43-45,
49-50, 174, 188-189, 193,
209, 229,231,236
Möller, Niklas, 11, 113, 185, 220
Mulgan, Tim, 65, 88, 161, 230
Murphy, Liam B., 10, 42, 88,
116, 164, 230, 232
N
Nagel, Thomas, 152, 230
Newey, Gien, 29-30, 106-111,
114, 230
Nielsen, Kai, 142, 230
Noggle, Robert, 96, 217
Norris, Andrew, 125, 221
North, Richard, 168,230
Nozick, Robert, 15, 57, 137-138,
230
Nussbaum, Martha C., 42, 45,
58, 97, 182-185, 230-231
O
O’Neill, Martin, 48, 112, 231,239
O’Neill, Onora, 171, 188, 231
O’Neill, Patricia, 197, 232
Okin, Susan Möller, 45, 182, 231
Olsaretti, Serena, 97,217
Otsuka, Michael, 14, 129, 136,
149,218-219
P
Parfit, Derek, 13, 151-152,231
Pätemän, Carole, 41,44-45,50,231
Peterson, Grethe B., 97, 230
Petrinovich, Lewis, 197, 232
Pettit, Philip, 79, 217
Phillips, Anne, 164, 232
Phillips, Michael, 49, 164,232
Platon, 9, 24
Plattner, Marc F., 160, 220
Pogge, Thomas W., 35, 53, 78,
116, 142, 199, 232
Powers, Madison, 42, 182, 232
Q
Quong, Jonathan, 125, 232
R
Räikkä, Juha, 139, 232
Rawls, John, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 19,
23-24, 29-56, 59-62, 64-71,
74-106, 108-118, 122-128,
130-133, 136-139, 141-143,
146-152, 154-155, 159-165,
168, 170, 173-181, 184, 186,
244
Indice de autori
190-195, 198-205, 209-213,
233,248, 250
Raz, Joseph, 124, 233
Reidy, David A., 48, 91, 98, 174,
236
Richardson, Henry S., 98, 233
Robeyns, Ingrid, 22, 40, 54, 58,
70-71, 97, 100-103, 164-165,
168, 182-184, 187, 189, 211,
218, 223,228,232-233, 236
Roemer, John E., 53, 199, 233
Ronzoni, Miriam, 13, 143, 233
Rossi, Enzo, 30, 72-73, 113-114,
142, 227, 234
Routh, David, 196, 236
S
Sangiovanni, Andrea, 55, 234
Schapiro, Tamar, 88, 234
Schaub, Jörg, 69-70, 234
Scheffler, Samuel, 145, 234
Schemmel, Christian, 48, 234
Schmidtz, David, 50, 85-87, 144,
211,234
Schramme, Thomas, 195, 234
Schwartzman, Lisa, 45, 188, 234
Segall, Shlomi, 42, 182, 234
Sen, Amartya, 49-58, 79, 97,
104-106, 159, 187, 189, 210-
211, 216, 225, 227, 230-231,
234,237
Shapiro, Ian, 129, 160, 235, 238
Shelby, Tommie, 45, 235
Sher, George, 42, 88, 235
Sidgwick, Henry, 24, 235
Simmons, A. John, 47-50, 56,
62-67, 84, 105, 116, 163-164,
235
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, 197,
224, 235
Sleat, Matt, 72, 75, 235
Smith, Michael, 79, 217
Stark, Cynthia A., 98, 235
Stears, Marc, 40, 141, 229, 237
Stemplowska, Zofia, 13, 15, 54,
88-91,95, 121, 163-166, 169-
171, 174-175, 189, 203-207,
224, 229, 234, 236-237
Swift, Adam, 15, 40-41, 70, 87,
90-91, 95, 129, 163-166, 174-
175, 183-184, 189, 195-196,
223, 232-233, 236-237
T
Talisse, Robert B., 142, 221
Tan, Kok-Chor, 68, 237
Taylor, Robert S., 53, 125, 163,
237
Temkin, Larry S., 15, 117, 119,
121-122, 137, 146, 151, 166,
192, 237
Thomas, Alan, 48, 51, 85, 237
Tien, Hung-mao, 160, 220
Tornasi, John, 139, 237
Tomlin, Patrick, 13, 237
Turner, Susan, 96, 217
Tversky, Amos, 197, 227
245
IDEAL-NONIDEAL
U
Uberti, Luca Jacopo, 170, 238
V
Valentini, Laura, 11, 50, 72, 88-
89, 143, 160, 170-174, 228,
233, 238
Vallier, Kevin, 190, 224
Van Schoelandt, Chad, 14, 238
Venkatapuram, Sridhar, 42, 182,
238
Vrousalis, Nicholas, 14, 238
W
Wagner Decew, Judith, 129, 238
Waldron, Jeremy, 73-76, 129,
238
Walzer, Michael, 42, 156, 161,
192, 195,204, 238
Weber, Michael, 190, 224
Wegener, Bemd, 196, 237
Weithman, Paul, 39, 238
White, Stuart, 40, 98, 237
Wiens, David, 50, 141, 221, 238
Williams, Andrew, 13,151,232,239
Williams, Bernard, 85,114,224,239
Williamson, Thad, 48, 112, 231,
237, 239
Williamson, Timothy, 26, 239
Wolf, Clark, 97, 217
Wong, Sophia Isako, 98, 239
Y
Young, Iris Marion, 42, 156-157,
161, 192, 204, 239
Young, Shaun, 79, 223
Ypi, Lea, 24, 142, 239
Z
Zucker, Ross, 160, 239
246
I
indice de concepte
A
abstractizare, 170-172, 187-188,
203
ajutor internaţional, 63
anarhism, 169, 211
argumentare morală
comprehensivă, 122,155
asumpţia absenţei limitărilor natu-
rale şi a accidentelor specifice
vieţii umane, 96, 100-104
asumpţia capacităţilor necesare
cooperării sociale, 61, 82-85,
93-95,99-104, 165,173
asumpţia circumstanţelor
„normale” ale dreptăţii, 64,
154,161, 166
asumpţia condiţiilor (socio-eco-
nomice)/circumstanţelor/
contingenţelor istorice
favorabile’ 36, 59-63, 77, 89-
94, 100, 108, 115, 118,123,
154-155, 159-161, 164-167,
174-175, 190
asumpţia conformării stricte, 32-
33, 36, 61, 69, 77-89, 93-94,
100, 154, 159-160, 165-170,
173-175, 184-185, 190-191,
193,201,203,206,211
asumpţia societăţii închise, 82,
103, 166, 173-174
C
capabilism, 57-58, 159, 182
capacităţi/oportunităţi funda-
mentale, 56-58, 159, 182
caracterul tragic al teoriei
nonideale, 185-186
caritate, 10, 71, 150
circumstanţele dreptăţii, 64, 154,
161, 166
circumstanţele politicii, 74-75
coeziune socială, 111, 132
concepţia generală a dreptăţii,
91-92
concepţia democratică a
filosofiei politice, 109
concepţia evaluativistă despre
principiile dreptăţii, 130-136
concepţia normativistă/realistă
despre principiile dreptăţii,
122-128
247
IDEAL-NONIDEAL
concepţia platoniciană/Ieninistă a
filosofiei politice, 109
concepţia practicistă a filosofiei
politice, 123-125
concepţia specială a dreptăţii, 91-93
concepţii morale comprehensive,
124
conflict militar legitim/justificat,
32-33, 63,70-71
conformare parţială, 32-33, 36,
59, 62-63, 65-70, 79, 82, 84,
86-89, 100, 161, 163-165,
167-168, 177-178, 180, 187,
201,203, 205-206,212
conformare strictă, 32-33, 36, 61,
69, 77-89, 93-94, 100, 154,
159-160, 165-170, 173-175,
184-185, 190-191, 193,201,
203,206,211
constrângerea fezabilităţii, 76,
122, 136-145, 148, 150, 189-
191, 198-199, 201,213
constrângerile „tari”/„slabe” ale
fezabilităţii, 189-191, 198-
199
constructivism (în teoretizarea
dreptăţii), 34, 136, 143-144,148
cooperare socială, 59, 61, 64, 74,
77-78, 82-83, 85, 93-95, 99-
101, 103, 111, 165, 173-174,
176, 202,211-212
cultură politică autoritară/demo-
cratică, 59, 91
D
datoriile/obligaţiile dreptăţii, 42,
59, 65-67, 78-81, 86, 88-89,
92,126-127, 130, 132, 167
decizie democratică, 58, 107-111
demnitate umană, 115, 182
democraţie bazată pe proprietate
(property-owning
democracy), 12,48, 162, 169,
210-211
democraţie constituţională, 48,
91, 109
democraţie liberală, 74-75, 107,
109, 160
design institutional ideal, 10, 12,
38, 47, 127, 169-170, 200,
205, 209-210
dezacord rezonabil generalizat,
74-76
dezbatere democratică, 111
dezirabilitate, 56, 119, 136, 149-
150
discriminare, 41, 78, 100, 188
diviziunea teoriei nonideale, 33,
59-77, 164, 181,212
dominaţie, 64, 156, 188
dreptate compensatorie/rectifica-
tivă, 32-33, 62-63, 69-70,
180, 200, 206
dreptate cosmică, 103, 168
dreptate cosmopolită, 103
dreptate de gen, 40-41, 44-45,
78, 99-100, 102, 182, 202
dreptate democratică, 160
248
M
Indice de concepte
dreptate domestică, 65,71,102-103
dreptate globală, 71, 103,
dreptate internaţională, 52, 59-
60, 62, 65, 71, 103
dreptate locală, 102, 182,186, 202
dreptate minimală, 102, 183,
185-186, 201-202, 206
dreptate parţială/aproximativă/
imperfectă, 80, 163, 178,
181-183
dreptate perfectă (sau aproape
perfectă), 31-33, 36, 46-47,
54-57, 61, 66, 68-70, 77-78,
86,91-93, 100-103, 118-119,
121, 137, 139, 146, 148, 150-
151, 153-154, 156, 158-164,
168, 175-176, 178, 181-184,
191, 193, 201, 203, 205-206,
210
dreptate politică, 77, 95, 99, 101,
175-176,211
dreptate rasială, 40-41, 44-45,
78, 99
dreptate retributivă, 62, 69-71,
180, 200, 206
dreptatea ca echitate (justice as
fairness), 29, 31, 34, 77, 83,
94-101, 104, 110-111, 125,
146-148, 150, 167-168, 173-
176, 190, 193-195
dreptatea ca îndreptăţire (Justice
as entitlement)y 137
dreptatea în distribuţia îngrijirii
persoanelor dependente, 96,
100, 104
dreptatea în distribuţia serviciilor
de îngrijire medicală, 102,
182, 202
Dreptul Popoarelor, 60
drepturi individuale, 56-57, 74,
123, 152, 163,210
drepturi individuale negative, 57
drepturile copiilor, 42, 59, 63, 66,
83, 95-96, 99-100, 181, 202,
212
drepturile persoanelor cu
dizabilităţi severe, 42, 59, 63,
66, 83, 95-100, 181, 202, 212
E
echitate, 34, 54, 110-111, 163
eficienţă, 55, 119, 125, 127, 131-
132, 138, 147, 150
egalitarianism, 11
egalitarianism al sansei (luck
egalitarianism), 12-13
egalitate, 10
egalitate de gen, 56, 78
egalitate rasială, 56
egalitatea accesului la
avantaj e/egalitatea socialistă
a oportunităţilor, 103, 118,
146,167-168
egalitatea comparativă (compa-
rative equality), 121, 146
egalitatea complexă, 156
egalitatea democratică, 159
egalitatea în drepturi, 56
egalitatea în faţa legii, 56
249
IDEAL-NONIDEAL
egalitatea liberală/egalitatea
resurselor, 153-155
egalitatea oportunităţilor pentru
bunăstare, 119-120, 146
enunţuri contrafactuale
condiţionale, 172-173
eroism moral, 126
etică/filosofie morală, 9, 17, 23,
71, 73,93, 197
exploatare, 78, 138, 156, 188
F
fezabilitate, 76, 117, 119-120,
122, 129, 136-145, 148, 150,
189-191, 198-199, 201,213
filosofie experimentală, 197
0
ghidarea/îndrumarea/orientarea
acţiunii politice, 10, 52, 123,
128
H
hybris, 106, 108, 112
1
ideal al dreptăţii, 46, 49, 52, 56-
59, 90, 107, 117-120, 122,
136, 138, 140-141, 149, 153,
184
idealitate/nonidealitate, 19, 94,
144, 159, 165, 169, 171, 173-
176, 181, 184-186, 190-194,
198-200,212
idealizare/idealizări, 36, 83, 94-
95, 100-104, 161, 163, 165,
170-177, 187-188, 190-191,
193,203
idealuri de organizare (socială şi
politică), 10, 12, 47-48, 54,
117-118, 122, 127, 132, 144,
154, 169
imperialism cultural, 156-157
indiferenţă/sensibilitate la fapte,
12, 103, 133-138, 141-146,
148, 161, 167, 188-189, 191,
198-199, 201,203,213
instituţii politice/publice, 10, 29,
31,’ 33, 36,61-63, 65, 67, 69-
70, 72, 74-75, 78, 80, 102,
104-106, 109, 113, 131, 138-
140, 164, 169-170, 179
insuficienţă moderată a
resurselor, 64-65, 161
insuficienţă extremă a resurselor,
65, 161
intuiţiile populare despre drep-
tate şi nedreptate, 194-197
intuiţii morale, 23, 73, 105, 137-
138, 151, 194-197
intuiţionism, 13, 136-137, 144,
148
L
legitimitate (politică), 10, 75-77,
116, 124,212
liberalism politic, 11
libertarianism, 57, 137, 151-152
250
I
Indice de concepte
libertate, 10, 54, 57, 58, 119,
138, 151, 169
libertăţi fundamentale, 34, 56-58,
74,’163, 210
lipsă de putere, 156-157
logica distincţiei ideal-nonideal,
70, 165, 200, 204,212
M
marginalizare, 156-157
metafilosofie, 26
metoda intuiţionistă în
teoretizarea dreptăţii, 13,
136-137, 144, 148
moralism, 17, 20, 23, 73, 113-
115
multiculturalism, 11
N
neconformare (la principiile
dreptăţii), 61-63, 67, 79, 206
nedreptăţi de gen, 40-41, 44-45,
50, 78, 100, 138
nedreptăţi internaţionale, 52
nedreptăţi istorice, 62, 70, 187,
193
nedreptăţi rasiale, 40-41, 44-45,
78
nedreptăţi sociale, 32-33, 35-36,
38, 46-47, 49-53, 55, 59, 61-
63, 67-70, 78-79, 89, 102-
103, 105-106, 128, 145, 162,
164, 186-188, 191-193,200,
205-207, 209
nesupunere civică, 30, 32-33, 63,
205
neutralism liberal, 11
normativism, 106-107, 111-114,
128, 133, 146-148, 152, 176,
190, 194, 202,212-213
O
obiecţie de conştiinţă, 30, 33,
205
obiectivul fundamental al fllo-
sofiei politice, 123, 128
obligaţia de asistenţă, 60, 63
opresiune, 156, 188
ordine socială, 111, 172
P
paritate participativă, 157
politici publice, 10,46, 111-112,
115, 130, 132-133, 139, 145,
210
politologie, 19, 22-23, 31
poziţia originară, 13, 33-34, 83-
84, 123, 126-127, 136
poziţia „perfecţionistă” în defi-
nirea idealităţii, 185-186, 202
practicism, 124,128,143,177,212
principii ultime ale dreptăţii, 12,
130-131, 133-134, 136, 138,
143-144, 148, 150
principiul diferenţei, 12-13, 34,
78, 92, 105
principiul dreptăţii în achiziţie,
137
251
IDEAL-NONIDEAL
principiul dreptăţii în transfer,
137
principiul echităţii în distribuţia
bunurilor şi avantajelor
sociale, 110
principiul egalităţii echitabile a
oportunităţilor, 34, 92, 105
principiul egalităţii sau
suficienţei capacităţilor
umane fundamentale, 56
principiul egalităţii umane
fundamentale, 11, 115
principiul libertăţilor egale, 92,
105
principiul reciprocităţii, 110
principiul tratării tuturor
indivizilor ca liberi şi egali,
115
prioritarianism, 12-13, 121, 151-
152,211
prioritarianism sensibil la
responsabi litate
{responsibility catering
prioritarianism), 121
procedurile democratice de
decizie, 75, 107-108, 111
R
raţiune publică, 11
realism, 17, 20, 23, 71-73, 79-80,
84-85, 106, 111-117, 122-
123, 125, 128, 133, 138, 154,
156, 159, 166, 171-172, 176-
177, 185, 190-191, 194, 199,
201-202,211-212
recunoaştere, 157-158
redistribuţie, 157
reformare şi dezvoltare socială,
36, 56, 104, 107, 112, 123,
178, 185, 193, 205
reguli de organizare socială, 131,
136, 144-146, 148, 150
reprezentare politică, 157
revoluţie, 32, 63
rezistenţă militantă, 32-33, 63
rezonabilitate, 109, 124-125,
128, 143-144, 170
S
sărăcie, 55, 59, 63
siguranţă socială, 111
simţul dreptăţii, 94, 110
socialism, 12-13, 169, 211
societatea bine ordonată, 31-32,
36, 39, 46, 60, 80, 167
societatea bună, 9, 55, 132, 148
solidaritate, 55, 71, 119, 132,
150, 169
suficientism, 147, 150-151,211
stabilitate, 84, 109, 111, 139-140
state eşuate (failed States), 64
statele în afara legii {outîaw
States),
statul de drept, 60, 63
statul minimal, 169, 211
structura de bază a societăţii, 29,
32, 46, 104, 127, 131, 179
252
ri
Indice de concepte
9
şansă oarbă (brute /wc )-şansă
prin opţiune (option luck),
153-154
ştiinţe economice, 123, 194
ştiinţe sociale şi politice, 15, 22,
38-42,45, 123, 194, 206, 210
ştiinţele politicilor publice, 210
ştiinţele sistemelor de organizare
economică şi politică, 210
T
teoria administrării conformării
parţiale, 69, 212
teoria aplicării pedepselor/teoria
dreptăţii retributive, 32-33, 69
teoria condiţiilor extreme, 65-66
teoria conflictului legitim, 32-33
teoria conformării parţiale, 32,
65-66, 163-165, 177-178, 187
teoria conformării stricte, 32,
163-165, 177-178, 184, 187
teoria design-ului instituţional
ideal, 169
teoria dreptăţii compensatorii/
rectificative, 63, 69
teoria dreptăţii distributive, 70
teoria dreptăţii internaţionale, 59-
60, 62, 65
teoria ideală a valorilor- teoria
ideală a instituţiilor, 169
teoria idealurilor, 169
teoria infracţionalităţii, 63
teoria neconformării
deliberate/nejustificate, 63
teoria neconformării
involuntare/justificate, 63, 66
teoria nesupunerii civice şi a
rezistenţei militante, 33
teoria obiectivului ultim al
reformei sociale-teoria
tranziţiei spre obiectivul
ultim al reformei sociale,
176-179,187, 191
teoria principiilor ajustării la
contingenţele istorice/teoria
condiţiilor defavorabile, 60,
66-67,212
teorii democratice ale dreptăţii,
160
teorii epistemice ale dreptăţii, 128
teorii ideale comprehensive-
teorii ideale parţiale, 102,
168, 184
teoriile dreptăţii de gen, 99-100,
102, 182
teoriile dreptăţii în distribuţia
serviciilor de îngrijire
medicală, 102, 182
teoriile ideale evaluativiste ale
dreptăţii, 117, 121, 128, 143,
145-146, 159, 166, 191, 194,
199, 202
teoriile ideale normativiste/
realiste ale dreptăţii, 36, 104,
152-160, 190-191, 194, 202
253
IDEAL-NONIDEAL
teoriile „locale” ale dreptăţii,
102, 182, 186,202
teoriile „minimale” ale dreptăţii,
102, 182-183, 186, 202
teza indiferenţei la fapte (a
întemeierii principiilor ultime
ale dreptăţii), 12, 133-138,
141-146,213
teza primatului dreptăţii, 11,127,
146-148, 152, 176
teza priorităţii teoriei ideale, 46-
59, 86, 104, 162,210-211
toleranţă, 74, 123
U
utilitarism, 135, 211
utilitate socială, 55, 119, 132,
150
utopie realistă, 122, 176-177,
180
V
vălul ignoranţei, 34, 126
violenţă sistematică, 156-157
254
Résumé
Le volume suit l’éclaircissement et le support argu-
mentatif de la distinction théorie idéale-théorie non idéale, telle
qu’elle est invoquée et utilisée surtout dans (quelques-uns) des
ouvrages de philosophie politique centrés sur le thème la
justice. Tout au long de cette démarche consacrée à l’accom-
plissement de cet objectif, le volume propose aussi quelques
analyses concernant l’autre question majeure issue de la
distinction idéal-non idéal dans la théorie politique: la question
de la fondation de la théorie idéale en tant que méthode de
spécification du concept de justice ou/et en tant qu’instrument
d’orientation de l’action, des institutions et des politiques
publiques.
En dehors d’un avant-propos (qui prépare le terrain et le
cadre exploratif du volume) et des conclusions (qui synthétisent
son parcours argumentatif et rappellent quelques explications et
observations fondamentales), le volume est structuré en trois
chapitres. Le premier chapitre met en discussion la distinction
théorie idéale-théorie non idéale selon la vision de John Rawls.
Son intention fondamentale est celle de clarifier, d’évaluer et de
synthétiser les principales affirmations et les thèses spécifiques
de la conception rawlsienne. Le deuxième chapitre fait l’objet
d’une investigation des principales contributions post-rawl-
siennes visant la démarche d’éclaircissement de la distinction
idéale- non idéale dans la théorisation de la justice. Le troisième
chapitre rejette la thèse selon laquelle la distinction théorie
257
IDEAL-NONIDEAL
idéale-théorie non idéale sera fausse, non justifiée ou, en tout
cas, dépourvue des traits catégoriques.
Conformément à sa démarche argumentative et expli-
cative, l’ouvrage propose la définition suivante de la distinction
idéale- non idéale dans la théorisation de la justice : la théorie
idéale est la théorie dont le but est d’offrir une réponse la plus
adéquate possible à la question « qu’est-ce que la justice
sociale? » Autrement dit, la théorie idéale est la théorie qui
définit ou spécifie le concept de la justice sociale. En échange,
la théorie non-idéale est le domaine de recherche académique
intéressé et obligé à répondre à toutes les autres questions
cardinales liées à la justice et à l’injustice: « la justice sociale
est-elle un idéal faisable ici et à présent? » « quels sont les
meilleurs politiques afin de corriger ou d’atténuer les injustices
sociales quotidiennes? », « quel stratagème est-il le plus adéquat
afin d’accomplir le design institutionnel qui puisse satisfaire le
meilleur les principes de la justice? », « de quelle manière sont
affectés les devoirs de la justice lorsque les autres échouent à
s’y conformer? », « quelles sont les exigences de la justice
rétributive? » ou « quels sont les principes de la justice
rectificative? ».
Mots-clés: théorie idéale, théorie nonidéale, justice, philosophie
politique, théorie politique
Traduit du Roumain par Anca Iuliana Çipoteanu
258
f Bayerische
I Staatsbibliothek
1 München
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Huzum, Eugen ca. 20./21. Jh |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1130261174 |
| author_facet | Huzum, Eugen ca. 20./21. Jh |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Huzum, Eugen ca. 20./21. Jh |
| author_variant | e h eh |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV044325084 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)992511473 (DE-599)BVBBV044325084 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03025nam a2200493 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV044325084</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20171129 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">170524s2016 xx |||| 00||| rum d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9786062401719</subfield><subfield code="9">978-606-24-0171-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)992511473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV044325084</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">rum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huzum, Eugen</subfield><subfield code="d">ca. 20./21. Jh.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1130261174</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ideal - nonideal</subfield><subfield code="b">filosofia unei distincţii în teoria dreptăţii</subfield><subfield code="c">Eugen Huzum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Iaşi</subfield><subfield code="b">Institutul European</subfield><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">258 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Colecţia Academica</subfield><subfield code="v">281</subfield><subfield code="a">Seria Filosofie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zusammenfassung auf Englisch und Französisch</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rawls, John</subfield><subfield code="d">1921-2002</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)118598678</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Politische Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4076226-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Liberalismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4035582-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gerechtigkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020310-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Politische Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4076226-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Liberalismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4035582-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Gerechtigkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020310-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Rawls, John</subfield><subfield code="d">1921-2002</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)118598678</subfield><subfield code="D">p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Colecţia Academica</subfield><subfield code="v">281 : Seria Filosofie</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV035808626</subfield><subfield code="9">281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029728464&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029728464&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029728464&sequence=000003&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Register // Personenregister</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029728464&sequence=000004&line_number=0004&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Register // Sachregister</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029728464&sequence=000005&line_number=0005&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">100</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0905</subfield><subfield code="g">498</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">001.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0905</subfield><subfield code="g">498</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029728464</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV044325084 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-12-24T05:57:18Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9786062401719 |
| language | Romanian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-029728464 |
| oclc_num | 992511473 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 258 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publishDateSearch | 2016 |
| publishDateSort | 2016 |
| publisher | Institutul European |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Colecţia Academica |
| series2 | Colecţia Academica Seria Filosofie |
| spellingShingle | Huzum, Eugen ca. 20./21. Jh Ideal - nonideal filosofia unei distincţii în teoria dreptăţii Colecţia Academica Rawls, John 1921-2002 (DE-588)118598678 gnd Politische Philosophie (DE-588)4076226-9 gnd Liberalismus (DE-588)4035582-2 gnd Gerechtigkeit (DE-588)4020310-4 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)118598678 (DE-588)4076226-9 (DE-588)4035582-2 (DE-588)4020310-4 |
| title | Ideal - nonideal filosofia unei distincţii în teoria dreptăţii |
| title_auth | Ideal - nonideal filosofia unei distincţii în teoria dreptăţii |
| title_exact_search | Ideal - nonideal filosofia unei distincţii în teoria dreptăţii |
| title_full | Ideal - nonideal filosofia unei distincţii în teoria dreptăţii Eugen Huzum |
| title_fullStr | Ideal - nonideal filosofia unei distincţii în teoria dreptăţii Eugen Huzum |
| title_full_unstemmed | Ideal - nonideal filosofia unei distincţii în teoria dreptăţii Eugen Huzum |
| title_short | Ideal - nonideal |
| title_sort | ideal nonideal filosofia unei distinctii in teoria dreptatii |
| title_sub | filosofia unei distincţii în teoria dreptăţii |
| topic | Rawls, John 1921-2002 (DE-588)118598678 gnd Politische Philosophie (DE-588)4076226-9 gnd Liberalismus (DE-588)4035582-2 gnd Gerechtigkeit (DE-588)4020310-4 gnd |
| topic_facet | Rawls, John 1921-2002 Politische Philosophie Liberalismus Gerechtigkeit |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029728464&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029728464&sequence=000002&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029728464&sequence=000003&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029728464&sequence=000004&line_number=0004&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=029728464&sequence=000005&line_number=0005&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV035808626 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT huzumeugen idealnonidealfilosofiauneidistinctiiinteoriadreptatii |